CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07418398Updated Jul 22, 2026

Exoskeletal-assisted Walking Combined With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Effect on Imaging and Serum Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Bone Strength.

An interventional study of Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW) and Sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) in Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Immobilization following spinal cord injury (SCI) results in muscle and bone loss below the level of injury, which ultimately predisposes to fracture at several sites throughout the legs and can lead to several medical complications that can devastate quality of life. There is a scarcity of research that has successfully implemented rehabilitation and/or exercise training interventions to preserve the musculoskeletal system during the acute phase SCI, or possibly reverse the muscle and bone loss that has already occurred in chronic SCI. This study will compare the effect of exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) training combined with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) (EAW + active tSCS), to that of EAW + sham tSCS, on measures of muscle and bone health in a cohort of chronically injured motor incomplete SCI. A successful outcome would expand treatment options to improve musculoskeletal health over the lifetime.

Read the detailed description

Background: Immobilization results in bone loss that predisposes to osteoporosis and fracture, which may be complicated by non-union, infection, and deep venous thrombosis. Reduced muscular contraction after SCI and the elevated release of cortisol contribute to a catabolic state, resulting in a loss of lean tissue mass (LTM) below the level of lesion. Six months after motor-complete SCI, the average muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) significantly decreases at the quadriceps, hamstrings, and hip adductors (14-16%), and 12% and 24% at the soleus and gastrocnemius, respectively. Following SCI, the quadricep muscles generate less total force and force per unit area when evoked by surface electrode electrical stimulation. This loss of muscle CSA and strength in the lower extremities limits the ability to stand, ambulate, and preserve bone - even if neural regenerative strategies could be implemented in the future. In addition to the marked skeletal muscle atrophy, persons with non-ambulatory motor-complete SCI also experience a precipitous loss of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) by as much as 1% per week below the level of lesion. In individuals with motor-incomplete lesions who have not reached their ambulatory potential, there is still considerable bone loss due to immobilization that can reach the fracture threshold years after injury. This rapid bone loss during the first two years after SCI results in volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the DF and PT decreasing by \~ 50% and 26% at the trabecular and cortical compartments, respectively. During the chronic phase of SCI bone loss continues more slowly throughout the individuals lifetime. This loss in muscle and bone places individuals with SCI at high risk for fragility fracture. More than 50% of individuals with SCI experience a fragility fracture over the course of their lifetimes. Objectives: Aim 1: To compare the effects of 108 sessions of EAW + sham tSCS versus EAW + active tSCS on the muscle-bone unit in wheelchair-dependent chronic SCI participants.Aim 2 (exploratory): To determine the acute time-course responses for serum/plasma biomarkers of bone resorption and formation, muscle contractile activity, and the mRNA profiles of circulating exosomes collected prior to (time 0), and again 30, 60, 120, 180, minutes and 24, and 48 hours following an acute session of both the EAW + active tSCS and EAW + sham tSCS training interventions. Setting: Participant enrollment, the clinical trial intervention (EAW + sham tSCS versus EAW + active tSCS), EMG data collection, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the cross-sectional area of the mid-thigh, and the time-course responses for serum/plasma biomarkers of bone resorption and formation and muscle contractile activity will be performed at the Kessler Foundation and the James J. Peters VA Medical Center.Design: After meeting eligibility criteria, wheelchair users with chronic SCI will be block randomized into the EAW + active tSCS group or the EAW + sham tSCS group (n=12 in each group). Both groups will receive 60 minutes of EAW overground training per session for a total of 108 sessions (3 X week for 36 weeks). In addition to the EAW training, the EAW + active tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral tSCS targeted to activate the locomotor central pattern generator. Participants: Twenty-four participants (12 participants/group) with SCI will be recruited over a 4-year period and randomly assigned to an EAW + sham tSCS or EAW + active tSCS group. At the end of the first year, approximately 3 participants will have completed the protocol. Outcome measures: At baseline, the investigators will perform imaging to measure bone density and strength, surface EMG to assess muscle contractility, and a time-course response for serum muscle and bone biomarkers following an acute bout of EAW. The investigators will capture these same data again after \~54 training sessions (mid-point), and after 108 training sessions (month 9 timepoint). In addition, MRI of both legs for muscle CSA will be performed at the baseline and month 9 time point.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Bone Mineral Density
  • Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking
  • Muscle Cross Sectional Area
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is close to the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-walkers with an SCI greater than 3 years post injury
  • As measured by a member of the study staff, participants who have a lower extremity motor score greater or equal to 16 on the INSCSCI exam with an impairment grade of C or D
  • Neurologic level of injury as determined by study staff between C5-T10 (completed at participant's screening)
  • Capable of gripping Lofstrand crutches and/or a walker without assistance
  • Wheelchair reliant 100% of the time
  • Height is between 62 inches and 74 inches
  • Weight less than 220lbs
  • Anthropometric compatibility with the EAW device:

    • Thigh length between 14 and 19 in (36 and 48 cm)
    • Shank length between 17 and 22 in (43 and 55 cm)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • As determined by the study physician from the screening health exam, a history of fragility or traumatic fractures, unhealed fractures, and signs of swelling, bruising, and discoloration of the legs
  • Current bone disease diagnosis (e.g., osteomyelitis, hyperparathyroidism)
  • As determined by the study physician from the screening DXA study, a T-score at the total hip \< -3.5 or aBMD of the knee (proximal tibia and/or distal femur) \< 0.60 g/cm2 from the DXA screen
  • Positive pregnancy test at any of the study intervention or assessment visits, or if female participants plan to become pregnant over the course of the study, they will be excluded or withdrawn (if already enrolled) from participation
  • Currently in a gym/rehabilitation program performing ambulatory interventions such as EAW, as determined by the study staff
  • Currently prescribed any medications that can affect muscle and/or bone metabolism, as determined by the study staff

Exclusion Criteria from MRI Safety Screening:

  • Medically unsafe to receive an MRI scan
  • Claustrophobia
  • Baclofen pump
  • Body metal, including any of the following:

    • metal fragments or pieces in eyes or any other part of body
    • pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices
    • aneurysm clips (metal clips on wall of a large artery)
    • metallic prostheses (metal pins and heart valves)
    • internal hearing aids (cochlear implants)
    • permanent eyeliner
    • shrapnel fragments
    • piercing that cannot be removed
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW) + active Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

    The EAW + active tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral tSCS while simultaneously performing EAW.

    Device: Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW) · Device: Active Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

  • Sham comparator
    Exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) + sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

    The EAW + sham tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral sham tSCS while simultaneously performing EAW. Participants in both groups will receive 60 minutes of EAW + sham tSCS overground training per session for a total of 108 sessions (3 X week for 36 weeks).

    Device: Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW) · Device: Sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

Interventions

  • DeviceExoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW)

    Participants will perform EAW will for 60 minutes per session for a total of 108 sessions (3 X week for 36 weeks).

  • DeviceSham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

    The lumbosacral tSCS electrical signal is set too low to have any biological effect while simultaneously performing EAW.

  • DeviceActive Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)

    Participants in the active tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral tSCS while simultaneously performing EAW.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle cross sectional area of the mid-thigh

    EAW + active tSCS will increase muscle cross sectional area of the mid-thigh more than EAW + sham tSCS.

    Time frame: Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline) and again at the 9 month study time point (post intervention).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bone Strength at the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia

    EAW + active tSCS will increase bone strength at the distal femur and proximal tibia more than EAW + sham tSCS.

    Time frame: Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), at the 4.5 month study time point (mid-point), with a final measurement completed at the 9 month study time point (post intervention).

  2. Muscle and Bone Serum and Plasma Biomarker Time-Course Response

    An intravenous line will be placed to draw serial serum and plasma samples prior to (time 0), and again 30, 60, 120, 180, minutes and 24, and 48 hours following an acute session of either an EAW + sham tSCS or an EAW + active tSCS training intervention depending on that participant's group assignment.

    Time frame: Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), at the 4.5 month study time point (mid-point), with a final measurement completed at the 9 month study time point (post intervention).

  3. Seated and Supine Electromyography (EMG) assessments of Muscle Activation

    Surface EMG data will be collected from muscles in each leg to assess surface EMG amplitudes of these muscles during attempts at volitional knee extension and flexion and ankle plantar- and dorsi-flexion using surface sensors. Furthermore, the resting EMG protocol will be performed to determine the individualized mapping to determine the minimum tSCS intensity required to evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP).

    Time frame: Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), at the 4.5 month study time point (mid-point), with a final measurement completed at the 9 month study time point (post intervention).

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Kessler Foundation
    West Orange, New Jersey 07052, United States
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
    The Bronx, New York 10468-3904, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Totosy de Zepetnek JO, Craven BC, Giangregorio LM. An evaluation of the muscle-bone unit theory among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012 Feb;50(2):147-52. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.99. Epub 2011 Sep 6. PubMed 21894164 ↗
  • Samejima S, Caskey CD, Inanici F, Shrivastav SR, Brighton LN, Pradarelli J, Martinez V, Steele KM, Saigal R, Moritz CT. Multisite Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation for Walking and Autonomic Recovery in Motor-Incomplete Tetraplegia: A Single-Subject Design. Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;102(1):pzab228. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab228. PubMed 35076067 ↗
  • Gerasimenko Y, Gorodnichev R, Moshonkina T, Sayenko D, Gad P, Reggie Edgerton V. Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 20. PubMed 26205686 ↗
  • Gerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20. PubMed 26077679 ↗
  • Karelis AD, Carvalho LP, Castillo MJ, Gagnon DH, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2017 Jan 19;49(1):84-87. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2173. PubMed 27973679 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07418398
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Chris Cirnigliaro, MS
Contact
christopher.cirnigliaro@va.gov
(973) 731-3900 ext. 2755
Christopher Cardozo, MD
Contact
Christopher.Cardozo@va.gov
(718) 584-9000 ext. 1828
Chris Cirnigliaro, MS
principal investigator · James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion