CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07399548PT-BASKETUpdated Feb 10, 2026

Effects of 8-Week Plyometric Training on Basketball Performance and Isokinetic Strength

An interventional study of 8-Week Progressive Plyometric Training Program in Athletic Performance, Physical Fitness and Muscle Strength, sponsored by Kastamonu University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.

Sponsored by Kastamonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 22 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of an 8-week plyometric training program on the physical performance of male basketball players. The research focuses on measuring improvements in linear sprinting speed, change-of-direction (agility) abilities, and vertical jump height. Additionally, the study examines changes in the participants' muscle strength through isokinetic testing. Twenty-four trained basketball players were divided into two groups: the control group followed their regular basketball training, while the experimental group added specific plyometric exercises, such as jumps and bounds, twice per week. By comparing the results before and after the 8-week intervention period, the study seeks to determine if this training method effectively enhances the athletic skills required in competitive basketball.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the multidimensional effects of a structured plyometric training (PT) intervention on competitive male basketball players. While vertical jump performance is a common focus in PT research, this study specifically evaluates the transfer of adaptations to sport-specific locomotor tasks and isokinetic muscle strength profiles.Participants (N = 24) were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG). Both groups maintained their standard basketball training, including shooting, 3-on-3 games, and defensive drills. The EG performed an additional 8-week progressive plyometric program twice weekly, consisting of exercises such as box jumps, depth jumps, and bounding, with a total volume ranging from 80 to 140 ground contacts per session. Training volume was meticulously logged, and an adherence rate of at least 85% was required for inclusion in the final analysis.Performance was evaluated through a comprehensive testing battery conducted pre- and post-intervention under standardized conditions. The primary outcomes focused on linear sprint speed (25-meter sprint) and change-of-direction (CoD) ability (V-cut test), which are critical for the high-intensity demands of basketball. Secondary outcomes included vertical jump height measured via countermovement jump (CMJ) with and without arm swing, and isokinetic knee and hip strength assessed at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second.The study hypothesized that the addition of PT would lead to superior gains in sprint and CoD performance compared to basketball training alone. Furthermore, it aimed to explore whether these performance improvements are accompanied by significant changes in isokinetic torque production. Data were analyzed using a 2 (Time) x 2 (Group) repeated-measures ANOVA to identify significant interactions. Normality was verified using Skewness and Kurtosis z-scores, with Winsorization applied to outliers to maintain data robustness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Athletic Performance
  • Physical Fitness
  • Muscle Strength
  • Plyometric Exercise Adaptations
  • Neuromuscular Performance in Athletes

Keywords

  • Plyometric Training
  • Basketball Performance
  • Change of Direction
  • Linear Sprint Velocity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kastamonu University is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Active and licensed male basketball players.
  • Age between 18 and 22 years.
  • Minimum of 3 years of competitive basketball experience.
  • Currently participating in regular team training at least 5 days per week.
  • Free from any lower-limb musculoskeletal injuries for at least 6 months prior to the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any acute or chronic injury that limits maximal performance during the study period.
  • Concurrent participation in any other external strength or power training programs.
  • Failure to attend more than 10 percent of the intervention sessions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Plyometric Training

    Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) followed a structured, progressive 8-week plyometric training (PT) program integrated into their regular basketball routine. The intervention was administered twice weekly (Tuesdays and Thursdays) with at least 48 hours of recovery between sessions. The program included vertical, horizontal, and lateral movements such as countermovement jumps (CMJ), box jumps, depth jumps, lateral bounds, and squat jumps. The volume progressed from 80 ground contacts per session in the first two weeks to 140 ground contacts per session in the final two weeks. Exercises were performed at maximal effort to maximize the utilization of the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC). All sessions were supervised by a certified strength and conditioning specialist to ensure proper technique and safety. This program was performed in addition to their standard technical and tactical basketball drills, which were identical to those performed by the control group.

    Other: 8-Week Progressive Plyometric Training Program

  • No intervention
    Standard Basketball Training

    Participants in the Control Group (CG) followed their standard basketball training routine for a duration of 8 weeks. This arm serves as the baseline to compare the specific effects of the plyometric intervention administered to the experimental group. The sessions consisted of standard technical and tactical basketball drills, including shooting practice, defensive positioning, offensive sets, and scrimmages (e.g., 3-on-3 or 5-on-5 games). Participants maintained their regular schedule of five training sessions per week, with each session lasting approximately 90 to 120 minutes. Participants in this group did not participate in any structured plyometric, strength, or power-based conditioning programs during the study period. All participants were instructed to maintain their normal nutritional habits and daily physical activities to ensure that no external variables influenced the performance outcomes.

Interventions

  • Other8-Week Progressive Plyometric Training Program

    The intervention consists of a structured 8-week progressive plyometric training (PT) program designed specifically for competitive basketball players. It is performed twice weekly as a supplement to standard technical and tactical basketball drills. 1. Progressive Volume: The training dosage is strictly controlled based on ground contacts per session, progressing from 80 contacts during Weeks 1 to 2, up to 140 contacts during Weeks 7 to 8. 2. Movement Protocols: The protocol includes multi-planar movements such as vertical (box jumps, countermovement jumps), horizontal (broad jumps), and lateral (lateral bounds) exercises to simulate basketball-specific demands. 3. Execution \& Recovery: Exercises are performed at maximal effort, focusing on minimizing ground contact time to optimize the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC). Sessions occur on a standard basketball court for surface adaptation. A recovery period of 48 to 72 hours is provided between sessions to prevent overtraining.

    Also known as: Plyometric Training, Stretch-Shortening Cycle Training, Lower-Body Power Training, Explosive Strength Training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 25-meter Linear Sprint Time

    Time taken to complete a 25-meter straight-line sprint from a standing start. This measure evaluates linear speed and explosive acceleration. The test is conducted on a basketball court using electronic timing gates, with the best time of three trials recorded to ensure data accuracy.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8).

  2. V-cut Agility Test Time

    Time taken to complete the V-cut agility test, which requires participants to perform four 25-degree directional changes over a 20-meter distance. This measure evaluates change-of-direction speed and maneuverability. The best time of three trials is recorded in seconds using electronic timing gates.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Countermovement Jump (CMJ) Height

    Assessment of explosive lower-body power. Measured using an Optojump photoelectric system (Microgate, Italy) while participants perform a maximal vertical jump with hands on hips.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8).

  2. Isokinetic Peak Torque of Knee Extensors and Flexors

    Maximal concentric muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors is measured at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second. Assessments are performed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Isomed 2000, D\&R Ferstl GmbH, Germany). The peak torque value from five maximal repetitions at each speed is recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kastamonu University, Faculty of Sports Sciences
    Kastamonu, 37150, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramirez-Campillo R, Perez-Castilla A, Thapa RK, Afonso J, Clemente FM, Colado JC, de Villarreal ES, Chaabene H. Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Measures of Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance of Water Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00502-2. PubMed 36036301 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The de-identified individual participant dataset, including performance outcomes (25m sprint, V-cut agility, vertical jump, and isokinetic strength values), will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request. Interested parties must provide a methodologically sound research proposal and sign a data access agreement. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator at Kastamonu University

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07399548
Lead sponsor
Kastamonu University
Responsible party
Mustafa Şakir Akgül (Department Head of Sports Management, Kastamonu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Dec 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2026
Completion
Jan 31, 2026
Last update
Feb 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion