CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07398547Updated Apr 28, 2026

The Effect of Training Frequency on Explosive Strength in Adolescent Tennis Players During a Six-Week Functional Training Program

An interventional study of High-Frequency Functional Training Group (HFFT) and Low-Frequency Functional Training Group (LFFT) in Exercise Therapy, sponsored by Biruni University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-28.

Sponsored by Biruni University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adolescence is a period characterized by rapid growth and development, characterized by intense structural, functional, and neuromuscular changes in the musculoskeletal system. The rapid height growth and proportional changes that occur during this period can negatively impact athletic performance by disrupting muscle strength and flexibility. Deficiencies in lower extremity muscle strength, in particular, can lead to decreased performance and increased injury risk in sports requiring high agility, balance, and explosive power, such as tennis.

Functional training programs are holistic exercise approaches that aim to improve neuromuscular control, balance, coordination, and muscle strength by simultaneously training multiple muscle groups. This type of training is particularly important in adolescent athletes because it supports the development of strength, endurance, and explosive power. Training frequency, in turn, plays a decisive role in muscle adaptation and performance enhancement by influencing the balance between loading and recovery.

Literature contains limited studies directly examining the effects of functional training frequency on explosive power performance in young athletes. Most existing research has focused on adult or professional athletes, and experimental studies comparing the effects of different training frequencies in adolescent tennis players are insufficient.

In this context, the aim of our study was to examine the effects of a six-week functional training program implemented at different training frequencies on lower extremity explosive strength parameters in adolescent tennis athletes.

Read the detailed description

Adolescence is a dynamic period accompanied by rapid growth and development, characterized by intense structural, functional, and neuromuscular changes in the musculoskeletal system. During this period, weakness in the lower extremity muscles can lead to decreased performance and increased injury risk in sports requiring agility, balance, and explosive power, such as tennis.

Functional training programs are comprehensive exercise approaches that improve neuromuscular coordination, balance, and stabilization by simultaneously activating multiple muscle groups. These types of training are particularly important for young athletes because they support sport-specific movement patterns, increase muscle strength, and optimize the energy transfer chain. Training frequency is a key variable in determining muscle adaptation, recovery time, and load balance. Therefore, studies examining the effects of different training frequencies on explosive power development in young tennis athletes are of great scientific and practical value.

Healthy adolescent tennis players who volunteer to participate will be included in the study. After recording demographic and sport-specific information, participants' explosive strength performance will be assessed using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ), Squat Jump (SJ), Single Leg Jump (SLJ), and Reactive Strength Index (RSI) tests. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: the first group will participate in a 60-minute functional training program once a week, and the second group will participate in a 60-minute functional training program three times a week. The programs will last six weeks, and all sessions will be conducted by the same physiotherapist. Assessments will be conducted before and after the six-week training program. The study employed a two-group, pretest-posttest design. This study aims to demonstrate the effects of different training frequencies on explosive strength development in adolescent tennis athletes, contributing to the scientific basis of training plans for young athletes and to optimize performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exercise Therapy

Keywords

  • adolescent tennis players
  • explosive strength
  • performance development
  • functional training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Biruni University is the lead sponsor of 172 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adolescent tennis players aged 12-18 years.
  • Have at least two years of regular tennis training history.
  • Regularly practice tennis at least three days a week.
  • Have not had an acute injury or surgery affecting the lower extremities in the last six months.
  • Have the physical ability to fully complete explosive strength tests (CMJ, SJ, SLJ, RSI).
  • Individuals who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study and provided written consent from their parents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with ongoing pain, instability, or deformity in the knee, hip, ankle, or spine area.
  • Those who have undergone a musculoskeletal physical therapy or rehabilitation program within the last 6 months.
  • Those with a systemic disease that may affect neurological, vestibular, or balance.
  • Those who experience pain or fatigue to the extent that they cannot complete postural analysis or performance tests.
  • Those who do not have a regular sports history or have not trained regularly in the last 3 months.
  • Participants who exhibited a lack of cooperation during the assessment process that could compromise measurement consistency.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Low-Frequency Functional Training Group (LFFT)

    Participants in this group performed the functional training program once per week for six consecutive weeks. Each session lasted approximately 60 minutes and included dynamic warm-up, multi-joint functional exercises, and cool-down activities supervised by the same physiotherapist.

    Other: Low-Frequency Functional Training Group (LFFT)

  • Experimental
    High-Frequency Functional Training Group (HFFT)

    Participants in this group performed the same functional training program three times per week for six consecutive weeks. Each 60-minute session followed the same structure as the low-frequency program and was conducted under identical supervision and environmental conditions.

    Other: High-Frequency Functional Training Group (HFFT)

Interventions

  • OtherHigh-Frequency Functional Training Group (HFFT)

    Participants in this group performed the same functional training program three times per week for six consecutive weeks. Each 60-minute session followed the same structure as the low-frequency program and was conducted under identical supervision and environmental conditions.

    Also known as: exercise

  • OtherLow-Frequency Functional Training Group (LFFT)

    Participants in this group performed the same functional training program once per week for six consecutive weeks. Each 60-minute session followed the same structure as the low-frequency program and was conducted under identical supervision and environmental conditions.

    Also known as: exercise

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Countermovement Jump Test (CMJ)

    The participant performs a rapid squat from an upright position with hands on hips, followed by a maximum vertical jump. This assesses lower extremity explosive strength and elastic energy utilization.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Squat Jump (SJ) Test

    The participant is fixed in a position of approximately 90° flexion of the knee and hip joints, then performs a maximum vertical jump without using the arms. It measures pure concentric muscle strength.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Reactive Strength Index (RSI) Test

    It's typically performed using a drop jump protocol. The participant jumps onto the platform from a specific height and bounces back up as quickly as possible after contact with the ground. RSI is calculated based on jump height and ground contact time; it measures reactive strength and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effectiveness.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Standing Long Jump (SLJ) Test

    The participant stands with their feet parallel and jumps as far forward as possible using their arms. Lower extremity explosive strength is assessed by measuring the jump distance.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Assessment of normal joint motion

    The Normal Joint Motion Assessment (NJM) Test is an objective method used to measure joint range of motion. In the study, participants' hip and knee joint flexion and extension angles will be assessed using the NJM test using a universal goniometer. Measurements will be made using active range of motion, and each measurement will be repeated three times and averaged.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sportplus Tennis Academy
    Istanbul, Maltepe 34844, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Axman S, Stausholm MB, Volk NR, Ferrauti A, Magnusson SP, Couppe C. Physical Performance Tests in 8008 Competitive Youth Tennis Players-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Normative Values. Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Sep;25(9):e70023. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.70023. PubMed 40884448 ↗
  • Colomar J, Baiget E, Corbi F. Influence of Strength, Power, and Muscular Stiffness on Stroke Velocity in Junior Tennis Players. Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 6;11:196. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00196. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32210838 ↗
  • Myer GD, Faigenbaum AD, Ford KR, Best TM, Bergeron MF, Hewett TE. When to initiate integrative neuromuscular training to reduce sports-related injuries and enhance health in youth? Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011 May-Jun;10(3):155-66. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31821b1442. PubMed 21623307 ↗
  • Fernandez-Fernandez J, Ulbricht A, Ferrauti A. Fitness testing of tennis players: how valuable is it? Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i22-31. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093152. PubMed 24668375 ↗
  • Markovic G, Mikulic P. Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med. 2010 Oct 1;40(10):859-95. doi: 10.2165/11318370-000000000-00000. PubMed 20836583 ↗
  • Castro-Pinero J, Ortega FB, Artero EG, Girela-Rejon MJ, Mora J, Sjostrom M, Ruiz JR. Assessing muscular strength in youth: usefulness of standing long jump as a general index of muscular fitness. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1810-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddb03d. PubMed 20555277 ↗
  • Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):513-8. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900518. PubMed 1962720 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07398547
Lead sponsor
Biruni University
Responsible party
alyildirim (PhD, Biruni University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Feb 10, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2026
Completion
Apr 5, 2026
Last update
Apr 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion