An interventional study of 810-nm Diode Laser and Bioactive Glass (NovaMin) in Dentinal Hypersensitivity, sponsored by King Khalid University. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-09.
Sponsored by King Khalid University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Dentinal hypersensitivity is a common clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentin in response to thermal, tactile, or evaporative stimuli. It can significantly affect oral health-related quality of life and routine dental care. Various treatment approaches have been proposed, including laser therapy and bioactive materials, with differing mechanisms of action and clinical outcomes.
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of an 810-nm diode laser, a bioactive glass-based desensitizing agent, and a placebo in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. Eligible participants with clinically diagnosed dentinal hypersensitivity will be randomly assigned to one of three parallel treatment groups. Pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analog scale following standardized air stimulus testing at baseline and at predefined follow-up intervals.
The study will evaluate both immediate and long-term changes in hypersensitivity over a 12-month follow-up period. The findings are intended to provide clinical evidence on the comparative performance of diode laser therapy and bioactive glass in the management of dentinal hypersensitivity.
Dentinal hypersensitivity is a frequently encountered clinical condition characterized by a short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentin in response to thermal, tactile, osmotic, or evaporative stimuli. The condition is commonly associated with gingival recession, enamel loss, or dentin exposure due to abrasion, erosion, or periodontal therapy. Despite its high prevalence, the management of dentinal hypersensitivity remains challenging, and no single treatment approach has been universally accepted as the gold standard.
Conventional management strategies are primarily based on either neural desensitization or occlusion of dentinal tubules. Bioactive glass-based desensitizing agents, such as those containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate, act by releasing calcium and phosphate ions that form a hydroxycarbonate apatite-like layer, leading to physical occlusion of dentinal tubules. In contrast, diode laser therapy has been proposed to reduce dentinal hypersensitivity through mechanisms that may include alteration of nerve conduction, coagulation of dentinal proteins, and partial sealing of dentinal tubules. However, the comparative clinical effectiveness and durability of these treatment modalities remain unclear, particularly over long-term follow-up periods.
This randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to compare the effects of an 810-nm diode laser, a bioactive glass-based desensitizing agent, and a placebo intervention in the management of dentinal hypersensitivity. Eligible participants diagnosed with dentinal hypersensitivity based on clinical examination and positive response to standardized air stimulus testing will be randomly allocated into three parallel treatment groups. Randomization will be performed using an appropriate allocation method to ensure balanced group distribution.
Participants in the diode laser group will receive non-contact laser irradiation applied to exposed dentin surfaces using an 810-nm diode laser at a standardized power setting and exposure duration. Participants in the bioactive glass group will receive topical application of a bioactive glass-containing desensitizing agent according to manufacturer-recommended instructions. The placebo group will receive an inactive intervention designed to mimic the appearance and application procedure of the active treatments without containing therapeutic components.
Pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analog scale following standardized air stimulus testing. Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up visits at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be the change in dentinal hypersensitivity pain scores from baseline. Secondary outcomes will include the sustainability of pain reduction and participant-reported comfort over time.
All clinical procedures and assessments will be performed by trained personnel following standardized protocols to minimize variability. Ethical approval will be obtained from the appropriate institutional review board or ethics committee prior to study initiation, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of this study are intended to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the comparative performance of diode laser therapy and bioactive glass-based desensitizing agents for the management of dentinal hypersensitivity.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants receive 810-nm diode laser therapy applied to hypersensitive dentin.
Device: 810-nm Diode Laser
Participants receive a bioactive glass-based desensitizing agent applied to hypersensitive dentin
Drug: Bioactive Glass (NovaMin)
Participants receive a placebo intervention without active desensitizing properties.
Other: Placebo
Non-contact diode laser irradiation applied to exposed dentin
Topical application of bioactive glass-containing desensitizing agent
Inactive material resembling test interventions.
Change in Dentinal Hypersensitivity Pain Score
Change in pain intensity associated with dentinal hypersensitivity measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) following standardized air stimulus testing on the affected tooth.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months
Sustained Reduction in Dentinal Hypersensitivity
Assessment of long-term changes in dentinal hypersensitivity pain scores measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) following standardized air stimulus testing.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Participant-Reported Comfort Level
Participant-reported perception of comfort and sensitivity related to the treated tooth, recorded using a structured questionnaire.
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. The dataset contains sensitive clinical and personal information, and participant consent does not include provisions for public data sharing. De-identified aggregate data will be reported through publications and trial registry results in accordance with ethical approvals and institutional policies.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
King Khalid University