An interventional study of laparoscopic appendectomy in Appendix Diseases and Surgery, sponsored by Mohammad Daboos. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-04.
Sponsored by Mohammad Daboos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Observational retrospective study included 765 children with Operative management by laparoscopic appendectomy, conservative management for appendicular mass and drainage of abscess by IR should be tried first. Interval appendectomy is reserved only for patients with recurrent symptoms. the study collect the Diagnostic data ,intraoperative and post operative data to submit the strategies of laparoscopic management in limited resources setting.
Background and study aims: In children with complicated appendicitis significant morbidity exists with prolonged hospitalization and increased costs. The management strategy for complicated pediatric appendicitis differs depending on facility resources together with surgeon's experience. Various studies investigated the usefulness of laparoscopic than open surgery even in complicated appendicitis. However, the treatment strategy remains controversial, especially in appendicular mass as well as appendicular abscess.
Methods: This observational study included 765 children with complicated appendicitis. over 10 years period. Patients' demographics, clinical criteria for different presentations of complicated appendicitis, diagnostic work up, plans of treatment based on laparoscopic management were reviewed and analyzed regarding different variables and postoperative outcomes.
Mohammad Daboos is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Complicated appendicitis: refer to acute appendicitis with perforation or gangrene, appendicular mass with or without abdominal abscess formation submitted for laparoscopic management with appendectomy and intraperitoneal suction of pus over the last 10 years
Procedure: laparoscopic appendectomy
Based on clinical findings, imaging studies and laboratory findings, after resuscitation, the decision of urgent surgery was according to the presentation Free peritoneal perforation (FPA) Perforated appendicitis with free peritoneal fluid were managed by urgent laparoscopic exploration Appendicular mass (AM) In patients presented by early mass formation lap exploration was carried out but trial of conservative management was planned for cases presented late with expected difficulty in lap dissection depending on surgical team and parental consultation, this accomplished by (nothing per mouth, I V fluid, I V antibiotic, temperature chart with U/S and biomarker follow up) Appendicular abscess (AAbs) Percutaneous drainage by availability IR team was the first choice however lap exploration and /or lap assisted extraperitoneal drainage was the second choice if IR failed or not available.
Primary outcomes
postoperative outcomes any alarming symptoms of intestinal obstruction developed (vomiting, fever, or severe abdominal pain, intraperitoneal collections
Time frame: 4 years
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mohammad Daboos