ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07383337Updated Oct 28, 2026

Comparing the Olfactory Perception of a Fragrance-Loaded SpECs Over Time

An interventional study of Fragrance in Perception, Self, sponsored by Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain. Completed at 1 site in Bahrain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Oct 28, 2026Now CompletedFirst site in Bahrain+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The human olfactory system plays a crucial role in sensory perception, influencing emotional states, memory, and interpersonal interactions(1). Fragrance durability and intensity are critical factors in the evaluation of perfumes and other scented products. The ability of fragrance formulations to maintain consistent scent intensity over time is a major contributor to a product's overall efficacy and consumer satisfaction,

Primary Aim To compare the perceived strength of a topical fragrance delivered via SpECs across a period of 8 hours using subjective ratings by participants and an independent examiner.

Objectives

  1. To investigate whether the encapsulated fragrance intensity, as perceived by participants, decreases less over time compared with fragrance alone, after application to the skin.
  2. To investigate whether the encapsulated fragrance intensity, as perceived by an independent examiner, decreases less over time compared with fragrance alone, after application to the skin.
Read the detailed description

The human olfactory system plays a crucial role in sensory perception, influencing emotional states, memory, and interpersonal interactions(1). Fragrance durability and intensity are critical factors in the evaluation of perfumes and other scented products. The ability of fragrance formulations to maintain consistent scent intensity over time is a major contributor to a product's overall efficacy and consumer satisfaction.

SporoSpECsin exine capsules (SpECs), are extracted from either pollen or plant spores in the form of empty porous microcapsules penetrated by nano-diameter sized channels. These channels enable a variety of active ingredients to be loaded into the SpECs chambers; hence, giving universality to the system to encapsulate such as a variety of antibody fragments, oils and proteins and peptides. The preparation that is to be used in this study has been provided to us as a gift by Sporomex Ltd, UK that is presently being used as a cosmetic preparation commercially, and has been investigated as a taste masking agent(2) and for oral pharmaceutical delivery(3).

It is unknown if fragrance loading of these SpECs will enhance the longevity of the fragrance on the skin. This study aims to evaluate the olfactory perception of a SpECs-based fragrance delivery system over an 8-hour period. The study will compare subjective ratings of the fragrance's intensity by participants and an independent examiner. This randomized, double-blind crossover trial will provide insights into the effectiveness of SpECs as a fragrance delivery medium, while also considering the influence of skin chemistry and time on olfactory perception. By eliminating patient variability, crossover studies can be more efficient than equivalently sized parallel group trials, where each participant receives only one treatment. Hence, treatment effects can be measured with greater accuracy using the same number of participants.

Type of Study Pilot randomized, double-blind crossover trial Participants

  • Sample size: 10 female participants.
  • Inclusion criteria:

    • Females aged between 18 and 45 years.
    • No history of olfactory impairment, allergies to pollen or fragrances, or skin conditions.
  • Exclusion criteria:

    • Current use of medications that affect olfactory function (e.g., antihistamines).
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
    • Any active upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks of the clinical trial
    • Any known skin allergy. Intervention
  • Fragrance delivery system: SpECs loaded with fragrance (50mg/ml perfume) versus fragrance without SpECs
  • Application: A smear layer of the fragrance-loaded SpECs will be applied to the wrist of each participant.

Randomization and Blinding

  • Participants will be randomized into two groups:

    1. Group A: Fragrance loaded with a concentration of SpECs grains.
    2. Group B: Fragrance loaded without SpECs grains.
  • Double-blinding: Neither the participants nor the independent examiner will know which preparation of the fragrance will be applied to the skin.
02

Conditions studied

  • Perception, Self

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • fragrance
  • SpECs
  • Olfactory
03

In context

Anosmia

180 studies on the registry are indexed under Anosmia; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 60 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Anosmia.

Browse Anosmia studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females aged between 18 and 45 years.
  • No history of olfactory impairment, allergies to pollen or fragrances, or skin conditions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of medications that affect olfactory function (e.g., antihistamines).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Any active upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks of the clinical trial
  • Any known skin allergy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Fragrance loaded with a concentration of SpECs grains.

    Fragrance delivery system: SpECs loaded with fragrance (50mg/ml perfume)

    Other: Fragrance

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Fragrance loaded without SpECs grains

    fragrance without SpECs

    Other: Fragrance

Interventions

  • OtherFragrance

    this intervention involves the controlled use of specific fragrance with and withouth SpECs grains

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained olfactory perception over time.

    The study will determine whether fragrance-loaded SpECs provides a sustained olfactory perception over time.

    Time frame: 6 hour period- 4 timepoints

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of SpECs concentration on fragrance

    Insights into the impact of SpECs concentration on fragrance strength and duration will be obtained.

    Time frame: 6 hour period- 4 timepoints

  2. alignment between participant's and independent examiner's ratings

    The alignment between participant's subjective ratings and the independent examiner's ratings will help validate the reliability of self-assessments in olfactory studies.

    Time frame: 6 hour period- 4 timepoints

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical University of Bahrain
    Al Muharraq, Busaiteen 0000, Bahrain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Herz RS. The Role of Odor-Evoked Memory in Psychological and Physiological Health. Brain Sci. 2016 Jul 19;6(3):22. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030022. PubMed 27447673 ↗
  • Diego-Taboada A , Maillet L , Banoub JH , Lorch M , Rigby AS , Boa AN , Atkin SL , Mackenzie G . Protein free microcapsules obtained from plant spores as a model for drug delivery: ibuprofen encapsulation, release and taste masking. J Mater Chem B. 2013 Feb 7;1(5):707-713. doi: 10.1039/c2tb00228k. Epub 2012 Nov 27. PubMed 32260776 ↗
  • Wakil A, Mackenzie G, Diego-Taboada A, Bell JG, Atkin SL. Enhanced bioavailability of eicosapentaenoic acid from fish oil after encapsulation within plant spore exines as microcapsules. Lipids. 2010 Jul;45(7):645-9. doi: 10.1007/s11745-010-3427-y. Epub 2010 May 22. PubMed 20495964 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2026 to primary completion in Feb 2026, 0 months.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anosmia, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 37. This study's 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 50 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 37.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 28, 2026: primary completion Mar 2026 → Feb 2026 and completion Mar 2026 → Feb 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 26, 2026
First posted
Feb 3, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionActual
Feb 10, 2026was Mar 2026
CompletionActual
Feb 10, 2026was Mar 2026
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 28, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Bahrain
Show site
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical University of Bahrain · Al Muharraq, Bahrain
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Feb 15, 2026→Feb 1, 2026 (actual)
Oct 28, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026→Feb 10, 2026 (actual)
Oct 28, 2026
Study completion
Mar 1, 2026→Feb 10, 2026 (actual)
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Completed
    1 site added — first site in Bahrain
    Show site
    • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical University of Bahrain · Al Muharraq, Bahrain
    Start date Feb 15, 2026→Feb 1, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Mar 1, 2026→Feb 10, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Mar 1, 2026→Feb 10, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07383337
Lead sponsor
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 10, 2026
Completion
Feb 10, 2026
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Mariam Murad
principal investigator · Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion