CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07381218Updated Apr 21, 2026

Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Facial Skin Laxity

An interventional study of Focused UltrasoundDot Hand-piece (FUS-D) and Focused Ultrasound Micro-focused Hand-piece (FUS-M) in Facial Skin Laxity and Skin Aging, sponsored by The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-21.

Sponsored by The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if focused ultrasound can improve facial skin laxity in adults. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  1. Does focused ultrasound treatment lead to clinically meaningful improvement in facial skin laxity compared with baseline assessments?
  2. What treatment-related adverse events occur following focused ultrasound treatment, and how frequently and severely do they occur? Researchers will also compare outcomes between the two sides of the face treated with different focused ultrasound hand-pieces within the same participants to explore potential differences in clinical response and safety using a randomized split-face design.

Participants will:

Receive a single session of focused ultrasound treatment applied to both sides of the face.

Undergo standardized clinical assessments, imaging evaluations, and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and during follow-up visits.

Be monitored for treatment-related adverse events throughout the study period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Facial Skin Laxity
  • Skin Aging

Keywords

  • Focused ultrasound
  • High-intensity focused ultrasound
  • Facial skin laxity
  • Skin aging
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Split-face study
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Male or female participants
  • Presence of mild to moderate facial skin laxity
  • Willingness to undergo focused ultrasound treatment of the face
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent
  • Willingness to comply with study visits and follow-up assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe systemic diseases, including but not limited to significant cardiac, hepatic, renal, or neurological disorders
  • Active skin infection, inflammation, or open wounds in the treatment area
  • History of facial cosmetic procedures (including laser treatment, injectable fillers, or energy-based devices) within the past 6 months
  • Presence of implanted electronic devices or metallic implants in the facial area
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to focused ultrasound treatment
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make the participant unsuitable for study participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Focused Ultrasound with Dot Hand-piece

    Device: Focused UltrasoundDot Hand-piece (FUS-D)

  • Experimental
    Focused Ultrasound With Micro-focused Hand-piece

    Device: Focused Ultrasound Micro-focused Hand-piece (FUS-M)

Interventions

  • DeviceFocused UltrasoundDot Hand-piece (FUS-D)

    Focused ultrasound treatment delivered using the dot hand-piece (FUS-D), applied to the contra lateral side of the face during a single treatment session. Treatment parameters follow the predefined study protocol.

  • DeviceFocused Ultrasound Micro-focused Hand-piece (FUS-M)

    Focused ultrasound treatment delivered using the micro-focused hand-piece (FUS-M), applied to one side of the face during a single treatment session. Treatment parameters follow the predefined study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in facial skin laxity from baseline assessed by VISIA skin analysis system

    Facial skin laxity will be quantitatively assessed using the VISIA skin analysis system. Skin laxity-related parameters will be measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 1,3, and 6 months post-treatment. Higher values indicate greater skin laxity. The change from baseline at each follow-up time point will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  2. Incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events

    Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded and evaluated throughout the study, including the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events following focused ultrasound treatment.

    Time frame: From treatment through 6 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Facial skin laxity assessed by VISIA skin analysis system for bilateral facial sides

    Differences in facial skin laxity between the two facial sides treated with different focused ultrasound hand-pieces will be evaluated using the VISIA skin analysis system. Skin laxity-related parameters will be measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Higher values indicate greater skin laxity. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  2. Merz Aesthetic Scale (MAS) score assessed by independent blinded evaluators

    Facial laxity will be assessed using the Merz Aesthetic Scale (MAS) based on standardized digital facial photographs. The MAS is a validated 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater facial laxity. MAS scores will be assessed by independent blinded evaluators at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  3. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score assessed by independent blinded evaluators

    Overall aesthetic improvement will be assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) based on standardized digital facial photographs. GAIS is a 5-point ordinal scale (Grade 1=Exceptional improvement; Grade 2=Moderate improvement; Grade 3=Slight improvement; Grade 4=No change; Grade 5=Worsening of the condition). Lower scores indicate better aesthetic improvement. GAIS scores will be measured by both participants and independent blinded evaluators immediately post-treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.

    Time frame: From treatment through 6 months post-treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Pain intensity score assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for bilateral facial sides

    Pain intensity associated with focused ultrasound treatment will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  2. Overall Participant satisfaction assessed by a 5-point Likert scale

    Participant satisfaction with treatment outcomes will be assessed at 6 months post-treatment using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will rate their agreement with statements regarding overall treatment outcomes on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 6 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laser Aesthetic Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data will be shared upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the ethics committee and the study team, and after signing a data use agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07381218
Lead sponsor
The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Responsible party
Huang Lvping (Chief Physician, The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Jul 3, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2026
Completion
Mar 14, 2026
Last update
Apr 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion