ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07380256Updated Apr 17, 2026

Visual Influences on Vestibular Adaptation

An interventional study of StableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA) in Vestibular Hypofunction, Binocular Vision Abnormalities and Reduced Vision, sponsored by Emory University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to learn whether a balance-training exercise called incremental vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation (IVA) is safe and effective for adults with vision impairments, with or without additional vestibular (inner-ear balance) problems.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does IVA cause only mild, temporary symptoms and no serious adverse events?
  • Does IVA improve eye-movement reflexes, balance, and walking, and do these improvements differ between people with vision problems alone and those with both vision and vestibular impairments?

Researchers will compare adults with vision impairment only to adults who have both vision and vestibular impairments to see whether the groups respond differently to IVA.

Participants will:

  • Complete symptom ratings before and after IVA
  • Undergo tests of vestibular reflexes (e.g., VOR gain)
  • Complete balance and walking assessments
Read the detailed description

Impairment of vestibular pathways can lead to deficits in balance, gait, and gaze stability. Gaze-stability exercises are a central component of vestibular rehabilitation and have been shown to improve vision during head movement as well as functional mobility in individuals with peripheral or central vestibular dysfunction. Improvements in gaze stability may occur through vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation or through compensatory saccadic eye movements. However, many adults with vestibular hypofunction also present with uncorrected visual acuity deficits or binocular vision abnormalities, such as low vision, convergence insufficiency, or ocular misalignment. These visual conditions are common but understudied in the context of vestibular rehabilitation, and it is not known whether they limit the capacity for VOR adaptation.

Incremental vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation (IVA) is a non-invasive, 15-minute training method that strengthens the VOR by exposing users to a controlled visual error signal. IVA uses a moving laser target whose velocity is programmed as a function of the participant's head movement, producing immediate increases in VOR gain. The method can be customized to provide unilateral, bilateral, or asymmetric adaptation, allowing targeted training for individuals with unilateral or bilateral vestibular deficits. IVA has been studied extensively in adults with vestibular hypofunction, but its effectiveness in individuals with impaired visual acuity or binocular vision abnormalities has not been evaluated.

This study will examine whether reduced static visual acuity or binocular vision abnormalities affect the magnitude of VOR adaptation in adults with and without vestibular hypofunction. Two experiments will be conducted using a cross-over design. Experiment 1 will enroll adults with abnormal uncorrected static visual acuity, with and withoutvestibular hypofunction, to compare VOR adaptation with and without vision correction. Experiment 2 will enroll adults with binocular vision abnormalities, with and without vestibular hypofunction, to evaluate VOR adaptation in their best corrected visual state. All participants will complete IVA training during two study visits separated by a washout period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vestibular Hypofunction
  • Binocular Vision Abnormalities
  • Reduced Vision

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vestibulo-ocular reflex
  • incremental vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation
  • abnormal uncorrected static visual acuity
  • Gait Disorientation Test
  • video head impulse test
  • vertical and torsional alignment nulling
  • dynamic visual acuity test
  • modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance
03

In context

Vision, Low

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Vision, Low; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Vision, Low.

Browse Vision, Low studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,405 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 237 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For All Participants (All Groups)

  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • Able to provide

Group-Specific Inclusion Criteria:

  • Group 1: Abnormal Uncorrected Static Visual Acuity (No Vestibular Hypofunction) Normal peripheral vestibular function
  • Group 2: Abnormal Uncorrected Static Visual Acuity + peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction
  • Group 3: Binocular Vision Abnormalities (No Vestibular Hypofunction) Normal peripheral vestibular function
  • Group 4: Binocular Vision Abnormalities + peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction

Individuals who have abnormal static visual acuity, a binocular vision abnormality (ocular misalignment, convergence insufficiency), and vestibular loss will be assigned to Group 4.

The following definitions will be used when determining group placement:

  • Abnormal Static Visual Acuity: Uncorrected visual acuity (head is still) ≥0.30 logMAR in both eyes.
  • Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: 60 ms VOR gain \<0.80 unilaterally for the lateral semicircular canal.
  • Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: 60 ms VOR gain \<0.80 bilaterally for the lateral semicircular canals.
  • Normal Vestibular Function: 60 ms VOR gain of 0.80 to 1.20 bilaterally for the lateral semicircular canals.
  • Convergence Insufficiency: ≥6 cm near point of convergence.
  • Ocular Misalignment: ≥4 prism diopters of manifest deviation of the eyes (tropia) on cover/uncover testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of fluctuating vestibular disorders (e.g., benign paroxysmal positional vertigo)
  • Neurologic conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis), dementia,
  • Alcohol or drug abuse,
  • A major psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia),
  • Pain that limits cervical spine range of motion by >50% or that results in an -altered gait pattern.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: Abnormal Uncorrected Static Visual Acuity (No Vestibular Hypofunction)

    Adults with abnormal uncorrected distance visual acuity and normal vestibular function. This group will be part of Experiment 1. This experiment studies people whose main visual problem is reduced uncorrected distance visual acuity (i.e., blurry vision without glasses/contacts). Experiment 1 tests the effect of blurry vision on VOR adaptation

    Device: StableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA)

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Abnormal Uncorrected Static Visual Acuity + Vestibular Hypofunction

    Adults with abnormal uncorrected distance visual acuity and unilateral vestibular hypofunction. This group will be part of Experiment 1. This experiment studies people whose main visual problem is reduced uncorrected distance visual acuity (i.e., blurry vision without glasses/contacts). Experiment 1 tests the effect of blurry vision on VOR adaptation

    Device: StableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA)

  • Experimental
    Group 3: Binocular Vision Abnormalities (No Vestibular Hypofunction)

    Adults with binocular vision abnormalities (e.g., convergence insufficiency, ocular misalignment) and normal vestibular function. This group will be part of Experiment 2. This experiment studies people whose main visual problem is how the two eyes work together (e.g., convergence insufficiency, ocular misalignment). Experiment 2 tests the effect of binocular vision dysfunction on VOR adaptation

    Device: StableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA)

  • Experimental
    Group 4: Binocular Vision Abnormalities + Vestibular Hypofunction

    Adults with binocular vision abnormalities and unilateral vestibular hypofunction. This group will be part of Experiment 2. This experiment studies people whose main visual problem is how the two eyes work together (e.g., convergence insufficiency, ocular misalignment). Experiment 2 tests the effect of binocular vision dysfunction on VOR adaptation

    Device: StableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA)

Interventions

  • DeviceStableEyes: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation (IVA)

    IVA is delivered using the StableEyes device, which includes a lightweight head-mounted unit with inertial sensors and a micromirror that controls the position of a low-power laser target projected onto a wall. The device adjusts the target's movement based on the participant's head velocity to create a controlled visual error signal that induces vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation. During each session, participants sit about one meter from a blank wall and perform rapid, self-generated head impulses while visually tracking the moving laser target. The target appears at neutral, moves at a fraction of head velocity during each impulse, and briefly disappears before reappearing at center. Each session lasts 15 minutes and includes roughly 150 head impulses in the horizontal or vertical plane. The procedure has been well-tolerated in prior studies with no reported adverse events.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex (VOR) Gain

    VOR gain will be measured using the video head impulse test (vHIT). Gain is calculated as eye velocity divided by head velocity during high-acceleration, moderate velocity, small amplitude head rotations in the plane of the semicircular canals. This outcome quantifies the strength of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, with higher gain values indicating stronger VOR responses, with normal gain = 0.8 to 1.2. The change in VOR gain from before to after training will be used to assess VOR adaptation. IVA: Incremental Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation

    Time frame: Baseline (visit 1) (before and after after IVA intervention), Visit 2 (2-10 days from baseline) (before and after IVA intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB)

    Participants stand under four sensory conditions (eyes open/closed on firm/foam surfaces). Outcomes include time maintained (0-120 seconds) and postural sway metrics from inertial measurement units. Higher times indicate better balance.

    Time frame: Baseline (visit 1) (before and after after IVA intervention), Visit 2 (2-10 days from baseline) (before and after IVA intervention)

  2. Change in Gait Disorientation Test (GDT)

    Participants walk 20 feet with eyes open and eyes closed. The GDT score is the difference in time between the two conditions. Larger differences indicate greater gait disorientation.

    Time frame: Baseline (visit 1) (before and after after IVA intervention), Visit 2 (2-10 days from baseline) (before and after IVA intervention)

  3. Symptom Severity During IVA (Verbal Analog Scales)

    Symptom tolerance during incremental VOR adaptation (IVA) will be assessed using verbal analog scales. Participants will rate the severity of blurry vision, eye strain, dizziness, and headache on 0-10 scales, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 10 indicates the worst imaginable symptoms. Ratings will be collected immediately before and after each IVA session to quantify changes in self-reported symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (visit 1) (before and after after IVA intervention), Visit 2 (2-10 days from baseline) (before and after IVA intervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Emory Ophthalmology Clinics
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Jason Peragallo, MD · Contact
    • Hannah Morris · Contacthannah.m.morris@emory.edu
    • David Sandlin, MD · Principal investigator
  • Dizziness and Balance Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
    Recruiting
    • Colin Grove, PT, DPT, PhD · Contactcolin.r.grove@emory.edu · 404-712-8685
    • David Sandlin, MD · Principal investigator
    • Colin Grove, PT, DPT, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A complete de-identified dataset will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: 12 months after the primary outcome is published; indefinitely

Access criteria: Mechanism: Through the Open Science Framework or Emroy Dataverse

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07380256
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Responsible party
Colin R. Grove (Assistant Professor, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2026
Start date
Feb 4, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Study contacts

Colin R Grove, PT,DPT,PhD
Contact
colin.riess.grove@emory.edu
(404) 712-8685
Hannah M Morris
Contact
hannah.m.morris@emory.edu
Colin Grove, PT, DPT, PhD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion