CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07371156PACEUpdated Sep 9, 2026

PACE Versus PE for CPTSD (PACE Trial)

An interventional study of PACE and PE in Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by Sofie Folke. Not yet recruiting at 10 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Sofie Folke · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
228
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this pragmatic trial is to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of Patient-centred Modular Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (PACE) compared with the standard post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment, Prolonged Exposure (PE), for adults with an ICD-11 diagnosis of Complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD).

Read the detailed description

This trial is designed as an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, parallel group, randomised clinical superiority trial of PACE versus standard PTSD treatment, PE, for ICD-11 CPTSD. The total sample size will be 228 participants. The trial will take place at the Danish Veteran Centre and two clinics in the Mental Health Services in Denmark. The participants will be adult military veterans and psychiatric outpatients with ICD-11 CPTSD. After giving their consent, participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either PACE or PE.

The experimental intervention will be 26 hours PACE (delivered as 26 1-hour sessions of weekly individual psychotherapy). The control intervention will be 25.5 hours PE therapy (17 sessions of weekly individual psychotherapy delivered for 90-minutes).

Outcome assessors, data managers, statisticians, and conclusion drawers will be blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome will be clinician-rated ICD-11 CPTSD symptom severity assessed with the International Trauma Interview (ITI) at 9 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include serious adverse events, suicide attempts, symptoms of depression, stress, and anxiety, alcohol use problems, mental well-being, and functional impairment assessed at 9 months after randomisation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sofie Folke as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: ≥18 years.
  • Referred to PTSD treatment (which requires absence of severe psychiatric comorbidity dominating the clinical presentation, hindering trauma-focused psychotherapy, assessed by the referring clinician at point of referral (e.g. major depressive disorder, ADHD, autism spectrum disorders, personality disorders, psychotic disorders, alcohol- or substance use, and aggressive behaviours)).
  • Diagnosis of CPTSD according to ICD-11, assessed by the interviewing investigator using the ITI interview.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current self-harm or severe suicidality defined as at least one self-harm episode or one suicide-attempt the last three months, as assessed by the interviewing investigator.
  • Any other condition that markedly compromises the participant's ability to adhere to the treatment programme or follow-up, such IQ \< 70 based on clinical judgement.
  • Currently involved in legal proceedings concerning work accident compensation related to PTSD, or trial regarding child custody.
  • Does not understand Danish or needs an interpreter.

Please note that participants need to be invited in order to take part in the trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
228 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PACE

    Patient-centred Modular Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

    Other: PACE

  • Active comparator
    PE

    Prolonged Exposure therapy

    Other: PE

Interventions

  • OtherPACE

    26 hours PACE (delivered as 26 1-hour sessions of weekly individual psychotherapy).

  • OtherPE

    25.5 hours PE therapy (17 sessions of weekly individual psychotherapy delivered for 90-minutes).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ITI

    CPTSD symptom severity assessed with the International Trauma Interview (ITI), (scale ranging from 0-48, higher scores indicate higher severity)

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. SAE

    Proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event (SAE) during the intervention period, assessed via patient medical records by a blinded outcome adjudication committee. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalisation or prolonging of existing hospitalisation, and resulted in persistent or significant disability or jeopardised the participant.

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  2. Suicides and suicide attempts

    Proportion of participants with a suicide- or a suicide attempt during the intervention period, assessed via patient medical records by a blinded outcome adjudication committee.

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  3. DASS-21, depression

    Symptoms of depression, assessed using the depression subscale from the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 items (DASS-21), (scale ranging from 0-42, higher scores indicate higher severity of depression symptoms).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  4. DASS-21, anxiety

    Symptoms of anxiety, assessed using the anxiety subscale from the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 items (DASS-21), (scale ranging from 0-42, higher scores indicate higher severity of anxiety symptoms).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  5. AUDIT

    Alcohol use problems, assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), (scale from 0-40, higher scores indicate greater risk).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  6. WHO-5

    Mental well-being, assessed using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), (percentage score from 0-100, higher scores indicate better well-being).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  7. SDS

    Level of functioning, assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), (scale ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired)).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

Other outcomes

  1. ITQ

    Symptoms of ICD-11 complex PTSD, assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), (a total symptom severity score will be calculated by summing PTDS items (P1-P6) and Disturbances in Self-Organization (items C1-C6) symptoms, yielding a score ranging from 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater CPTSD symptom severity)

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  2. TIQ

    Trauma-related identity, assessed with the Trauma Identity Questionnaire, (scale ranging from 0 to 105 with higher scores representing presence of negative identity characteristics associated with traumatic experiences).

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  3. ETMQ

    Sensory and cognitive-emotional qualities of traumatic memories, assessed with the Experiences of Traumatic Memories Questionnaire (ETMQ), (scores range from 0-32 with higher scores reflecting more intense sensation-based trauma memories).

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  4. CSS

    Level of perceived social support, assessed with the Crisis Support Scale (CSS), (scale ranging from 6-42, higher scores indicate greater perceived social support).

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  5. EQ-5D-5L

    Health-related quality of life, assessed using the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L). Index score (score between -1 and 1, higher scores indicate better health).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  6. DSS

    Dissociative symptoms, assessed using the Dissociative Symptoms Scale (DSS), Scale ranging from 0 to 80, higher scores indicate greater dissociative symptom severity).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  7. MIOS

    Moral injury-related distress, assessed using the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS), (scale ranging from 0 to 56, higher scores indicate greater moral injury-related distress).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  8. ISI

    Insomnia severity, assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), (scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 28 (severe insomnia)).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  9. DASS-21, stress

    Symptoms of stress, assessed using the stress subscale from the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 items (DASS-21), (scale ranging from 0-42, higher scores indicate higher severity of stress symptoms).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

  10. DUDIT

    Drug use problems, assessed using the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT), (scale from 0-44, higher scores indicate greater risk of drug-related disorders).

    Time frame: End of intervention, 9 months after randomisation (and assessed as an exploratory outcome at 18 months after randomisation)

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • The Outpatient Clinic for PTSD, Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
    • Mikkel Arendt · Contact
  • The Outpatient Clinic for PTSD at Ballerup, Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Capital Region of Denmark
    Ballerup Municipality, 2750, Denmark
    • Clas Winding · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Høvelte: Livgardens Kaserne, Høveltevej 117
    Birkerød, 3460, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Svanemøllen: Svanemøllens Kaserne, Ryvangs Allé 1-3
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Fredericia: Ryes Kaserne, Treldevej 110
    Fredericia, 7000, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Holstebro: Jydske Dragonregiment, Dragonkasernen 1
    Holstebro, 7500, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Karup: Flyvestation Karup, Herningvej 30
    Karup, 7470, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Aalborg: Aalborg Kaserner, Gl. Høvej 34
    Nørresundby, 9400, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Ringsted: Ringsted Kaserne, Garnisonen 1
    Ringsted, 4100, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
  • Danish Veterans Centre - Slagelse: Antvorskov Kaserne, Charlottedal Allé 4
    Slagelse, 4200, Denmark
    • Sofie Folke · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After the results have been published, we aim to make a depersonalised dataset publicly available on e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov and/or the European Union (EU) Zenodo database (https://zenodo.org/). The final choice will reflect which platform(s) that are compliant with current legislation at that time.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07371156
Lead sponsor
Sofie Folke
Collaborators
Danish Veterans Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
Responsible party
Sofie Folke (PhD, Psychologist, Senior Researcher, Danish Veterans Centre) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Sofie Folke
Contact
VETC-KTP-PACE@mil.dk
+45 7281 9700
Sofie Folke
Contact
VETC-KTP-PACE@mil.dk
Sofie Folke
principal investigator · Military Psychology Department, Danish Veterans Centre, part of Defence Command Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion