CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07347561Updated Sep 11, 2026

A Comparison of Myoelectric and Bionic Hands

An observational study in Amputation, Upper Limb Amputation and Prosthesis, sponsored by Gulhane School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Gulhane School of Medicine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to compare myoelectric and bionic hands in terms of upper extremity function, body image and satisfaction.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

- Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands?

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands?

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Upper Limb Amputation
  • Prosthesis

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • bionic hand
  • myoelectric hand
  • prosthesis
  • trans-humeral
  • trnas-radial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gulhane School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study included individuals aged 8-65 who had undergone upper limb amputation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 to 65 years
  • Individuals with unilateral upper limb amputation
  • Regular use of a prosthetic device for at least 6 months
  • Use of a semi-electronic elbow joint prosthetic component
  • Ability to understand and complete study assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of bilateral or multiple limb amputations
  • Proximal upper limb amputation at the shoulder level or above
  • Coexisting neurological or orthopedic disorders that may affect upper limb function or study outcomes
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Bionic Prosthetic Hand Group

    Participants use advanced myoelectric prosthetic hands with multi-articulating structures and enhanced control features designed to improve functional performance.These devices are designed to enhance hand function, dexterity, and user interaction beyond conventional myoelectric control.

  • Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand Group

    Participants in this group are individuals with upper limb amputation who use a myoelectric prosthetic hand controlled by surface electromyographic signals from residual limb muscles. These devices provide electrically powered hand movement and basic grasp functions without advanced bionic or sensor-integrated features.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper Limb Functionol Index-15

    The Upper Limb Functional Index-15 (ULFI-15) is a 15-item patient-reported outcome measure used to assess functional limitations related to the upper extremity. It evaluates difficulties in daily activities, movement, and functional performance of the upper limb. Higher scores indicate greater functional limitation.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Amputee Body Image Scale

    The Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess body image perception and body-related concerns in individuals with limb amputation. It measures the psychological impact of amputation on body image, with higher scores reflecting greater body image disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey

    The Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate functional status, satisfaction, and quality of life in individuals using orthotic or prosthetic devices. It assesses the user's perceived functional ability and satisfaction with their prosthetic device and related services.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Health Sciences Gülhane Faculty of Health Sciences
    Ankara, Keçiören 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ; CP; FAAOP. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247-62. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0192. PubMed 26230500 ↗
  • Kannenberg, A., Lundstrom, R., Hibler, K. D., & Johnson, S. S. (2023). Differences in two multiarticulating myoelectric hands for facilitating activities of daily living in individuals with transradial amputation: a cross-sectional study. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 35(1), 38-43.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07347561
Lead sponsor
Gulhane School of Medicine
Responsible party
Güllü Aydın Yağcıoğlu (Asst. Prof, Gulhane School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 16, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2026
Completion
Mar 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion