CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07327372Updated Mar 4, 2026

PENG Block With Dexmedetomidine in Older Adults

An interventional study of Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution and Dexmedetomidine in Hip Osteoarthritis and Arthropathy of Hip, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain after hip surgery is a common problem in older adults and may delay early mobilization, increase the need for opioid pain medications, and contribute to complications such as delirium, nausea, or prolonged hospital stay. Regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used to improve pain control while reducing the use of systemic opioids.

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a modern ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique designed to provide effective pain relief after hip surgery while preserving muscle strength. It allows patients to begin mobilization earlier and may reduce the risk of postoperative complications, which is particularly important in older adults.

Ropivacaine is a commonly used local anesthetic for nerve blocks. Dexmedetomidine is a medication that, when added in small doses to local anesthetics, may prolong pain relief and improve the quality of nerve blocks without significantly increasing side effects. However, the benefits and safety of adding dexmedetomidine to the PENG block in older adults have not been sufficiently studied.

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two PENG block techniques in older adults undergoing hip surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive a PENG block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The second group will receive a PENG block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine combined with 25 micrograms of dexmedetomidine.

The study hypothesis is that the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in the PENG block will provide longer-lasting and more effective postoperative pain relief compared with ropivacaine alone, without increasing adverse effects. Outcomes assessed in the study will include postoperative pain intensity, need for additional pain medications, time to first mobilization, and the occurrence of side effects such as low blood pressure, slow heart rate, excessive sedation, or delirium.

The results of this study may help optimize regional anesthesia techniques for hip surgery in older adults and contribute to safer, more effective postoperative pain management strategies.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain following hip surgery is a significant clinical problem in older adults and is associated with delayed mobilization, increased opioid consumption, higher risk of delirium, and prolonged hospitalization. Effective pain control that preserves motor function is particularly important in this population to support early rehabilitation and reduce postoperative complications.

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique that targets the sensory innervation of the anterior hip capsule while sparing motor nerves. This technique has been shown to provide effective analgesia after hip surgery and may facilitate early postoperative mobilization. However, the duration of analgesia achieved with local anesthetics alone may be limited.

Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic commonly used for peripheral nerve blocks. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that has been used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics to prolong analgesia and improve block quality. When administered in low perineural doses, dexmedetomidine may enhance analgesic duration without causing clinically significant systemic side effects. Nevertheless, data regarding its use as an adjuvant to the PENG block in older adults are limited.

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing two PENG block regimens in older adults undergoing hip surgery. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The control group will receive a PENG block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The intervention group will receive a PENG block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine combined with 25 micrograms of dexmedetomidine. The PENG block will be performed under ultrasound guidance by experienced anesthesiologists according to a standardized protocol.

All participants will receive standardized general or regional anesthesia for surgery and postoperative multimodal analgesia according to institutional protocols. Postoperative pain management will be identical in both groups, except for the study intervention, to minimize confounding factors.

The primary objective of the study is to assess whether the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine prolongs and improves postoperative analgesia provided by the PENG block compared with ropivacaine alone. Secondary objectives include evaluation of postoperative pain intensity, total opioid consumption, time to first mobilization, and patient comfort.

Safety outcomes will also be assessed, with particular attention to adverse effects relevant to older adults, including hypotension, bradycardia, excessive sedation, nausea, vomiting, and postoperative delirium. Hemodynamic parameters and sedation levels will be monitored routinely in the postoperative period.

The results of this study are expected to provide clinically relevant information on the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to the PENG block in older adults. These findings may contribute to the optimization of regional anesthesia strategies and improved postoperative pain management in this vulnerable population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Osteoarthritis
  • Arthropathy of Hip

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

628 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 121 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 90 across 450 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older
  • Scheduled for elective or emergency hip surgery (e.g., hip fracture fixation or hip arthroplasty)
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Ability to communicate pain intensity using the NRS scale
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient or legal representative
  • Planned use of PENG block as part of multimodal perioperative analgesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • Allergy, intolerance, or contraindication to any study medication: ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit or neuropathy of the affected limb
  • Coagulopathy (INR >1.5, platelets \<100,000/µL) or current therapeutic anticoagulation that contraindicates regional anesthesia
  • Infection at or near the injection site
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment
  • History of chronic opioid use (daily opioids >30 days before surgery)
  • Cognitive impairment or delirium precluding reliable pain assessment
  • BMI > 40 kg/m² (if you want to exclude for technical difficulty)
  • Patients receiving another regional nerve block for hip surgery
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PENG Block With Ropivacaine

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block using ropivacaine 0.2%, total volume 20 mL, administered as a single perineural injection prior to surgery. The block will be performed according to a standardized protocol by an experienced anesthesiologist.

    Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

  • Experimental
    PENG Block With Ropivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block using ropivacaine 0.2% (20 mL) combined with dexmedetomidine 25 micrograms, administered as a single perineural injection prior to surgery. The block will be performed according to a standardized protocol by an experienced anesthesiologist.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugRopivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

    Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic used for regional anesthesia. In this study, it is administered perineurally as part of an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for postoperative pain management in older adults undergoing hip surgery.

    Also known as: Ropivacaine hydrochloride

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics to enhance and prolong analgesia. In this study, dexmedetomidine is administered perineurally in combination with ropivacaine as part of an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.

    Also known as: Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Rescue Analgesia

    Time (in hours) from the end of the PENG block (completion of local anesthetic injection) to the first administration of rescue analgesia (opioid or non-opioid) given for pain intensity ≥4 on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Data will be collected from anesthesia records and postoperative medication charts.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity at Rest (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  2. Pain Intensity at Rest (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  3. Pain Intensity at Rest (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  4. Pain Intensity at Rest (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  5. Pain Intensity at Rest (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  6. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity during standardised hip movement (e.g., flexion or assisted mobilization) assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  7. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity during standardised hip movement (e.g., flexion or assisted mobilization) assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  8. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity during standardised hip movement (e.g., flexion or assisted mobilization) assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  9. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity during standardised hip movement (e.g., flexion or assisted mobilization) assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  10. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS 0-10)

    Pain intensity during standardised hip movement (e.g., flexion or assisted mobilization) assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Mean NRS scores at each time point will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  11. Total Opioid Consumption

    Cumulative dose of all opioid analgesics administered in the postoperative period, converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Values at 24 and 48 hours will be recorded and compared between groups.

    Time frame: 0-48 hours after surgery

  12. Block-Related Adverse Events, Including Neurological Complications

    Incidence of complications potentially related to the PENG block or perineural adjuvants, including signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, prolonged motor or sensory deficit, nerve injury (evaluated in the postoperative clinic or outpatient nerve injury clinic if required), infection at the injection site, hematoma, or persistent weakness.

    Time frame: From block placement until hospital discharge, up to 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences
    Poznan, 62-701, Poland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07327372
Lead sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Feb 6, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

Malgorzata Reysner, MD PhD
Contact
mreysner@ump.edu.pl
+48 61 873 83 03
Malgorzata Reysner, MD PhD
study chair · Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion