ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07325487Updated Jul 20, 2026

Interposed Nucleus aDBS for Ataxia

An interventional study of Deep Brain Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA) and Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6, sponsored by University of Florida. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-20.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, open-label study designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of cerebellar adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in adults with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). A total of 5 participants will be enrolled.

Participants will undergo surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads targeting the motor interposed nucleus of the cerebellum. The leads will be connected to one or two implantable pulse generators capable of delivering stimulation to deep brain structures and recording neural activity.

Participants will complete up to 18 in-person study visits over a 24-month follow-up period. During these visits, neural signals will be recorded under varying behavioral tasks and stimulation conditions.

Early study visits will be used to identify optimal stimulation parameters and neural biomarkers associated with disease state. These biomarkers will subsequently be used to implement adaptive DBS, in which stimulation amplitude is automatically adjusted in response to recorded neural activity.

Study outcomes will include assessments of safety and feasibility of cerebellar aDBS, as well as preliminary evaluation of its effects on clinical measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA)
  • Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6

Keywords

  • SCA6
  • Spinocerebellar Ataxia
  • adaptive deep brain stimulation
  • aDBS
  • Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6
  • DBS
  • deep brain stimulation
03

In context

Spinocerebellar Ataxias

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinocerebellar Ataxias; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5 is below the median of 31 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Spinocerebellar Ataxias.

Browse Spinocerebellar Ataxias studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,287 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 143 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of SCA6 by a movement disorders specialist following established criteria recommended by the Movement Disorders Society
  • A positive genetic test for SCA6
  • A total score ≥ 8 on the Scale of the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) rating scale
  • Ability to walk with or without support (score \<8 on the 'gait' subsection of the SARA rating scale)
  • Age ≥ 21 years and \<89 years
  • Ability to give for the study
  • Ability to understand the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol
  • History of previously implanted neurostimulators, pacemakers, defibrillators, or metallic head implants
  • Severe cognitive impairment or dementia, defined as a score \<21 on the (MOCA)
  • Evidence of ataxia due to other etiologies, including but not limited to:

    • Genetic/inherited disorders other than SCA6
    • Acquired causes: traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, infections or post-infectious cerebellitis, ataxias (e.g., anti-GAD, gluten ataxia)
    • Toxic/metabolic causes: alcoholic cerebellar degeneration, vitamin deficiencies
    • Structural, vascular, or neoplastic causes: cerebellar stroke, tumors, congenital malformations
    • Suspected multiple system atrophy-cerebellar type (MSA-C)
  • Presence of active and untreated psychiatric illness, severe depression (Beck Depression Inventory ≥ 21), or personality disorder at the discretion of the study team
  • Coagulopathy, uncontrolled epilepsy, or other medical conditions that are considered to place the patient at elevated risk for surgical complications
  • Presence of a concomitant medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the study participation or gait/balance, for example, severe arthritis
  • Requirement of diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy, or transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Active suicidal ideation, defined as fined as a "Yes" response to questions #2-5 within the past one month on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, C-SSRS
  • epilepsy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS)

    Participants will undergo surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads targeting the motor interposed nucleus of the cerebellum. Approximately one month after implantation, participants will begin conventional DBS (cDBS) programming to identify optimal stimulation parameters, including amplitude, contact configuration, frequency, and pulse width, and to assess stimulation-related adverse effects and device function. Approximately nine months after implantation, stimulation settings will be transitioned to adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation amplitude is automatically adjusted based on recorded neural activity. Adaptive DBS will be used to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of cerebellar aDBS. Clinical outcomes, symptoms, and potential side effects will be assessed throughout the study using participant self-reports, validated clinical rating scales, and wearable devices to collect movement and sleep data.

    Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceDeep Brain Stimulation

    This device will be surgically implanted into the interposed nucleus of the cerebellum.

    Also known as: Medtronic Percept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The identification of a physiological signal to use as the aDBS feedback signal

    Local field potentials (LFP) will be recorded in the clinic as well as chronically at home. These recordings will be analyzed to identify electrophysiological markers of disease states and therapeutic effects.

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

  2. The incidence of unexpected adverse events and serious adverse events with aDBS compared to baseline

    Adverse events are monitored the entire time subject is enrolled in study. Unexpected and serious adverse events from baseline through study completion, about 2 years, is a primary endpoint.

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Upright Balance Assessment measured by force plate parameters

    The Upright Balance Assessment is designed to evaluate walking and balance.

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

  2. The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

    The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is an 8-item performance based scale used to determine the severity of ataxia. Scoring ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating greater ataxia severity.

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

  3. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia)

    The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) is a 70-item scale divided into three domains of patient experiences assessing physical function, activities of daily living (ADL), and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 280, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life.

    Time frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2031, 60 months after the start.

Of 28 interventional studies with no phase under Spinocerebellar Ataxias, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2026
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
StartActual
Jun 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2031
CompletionEst.
Jun 2031
Last update
Jul 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07325487
Collaborators
Raynor Cerebellum Project
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Jun 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2026

Study contacts

Julia C Gonzalez, BA
Contact
Julia.Gonzalez@neurology.ufl.edu
(352) 265-0111 ext. 32495
Emily Rafferty, PhD
Contact
Emily.Rafferty@neurology.ufl.edu
Coralie de Hemptinne, PhD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion