CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07322029Updated Jan 7, 2026

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

An interventional study of Intrathecal morphine group and TAPB in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
252
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery has become the standard approach for the treatment of benign and malignant gynecologic diseases, offering the advantages of reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery. However, postoperative pain remains a major barrier to optimal recovery, with up to 40% of patients experiencing moderate to severe pain within the first 24 hours after laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery typically induces both somatic pain from abdominal wall incisions and visceral pain caused by peritoneal traction and pneumoperitoneum, making effective analgesia challenging. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is commonly used to control somatic incisional pain but provides limited relief of visceral pain, often resulting in increased opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects such as dizziness and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) offers potent and long-lasting visceral analgesia with minimal systemic opioid requirements and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple surgical settings. The complementary analgesic mechanisms of TAPB and intrathecal morphine suggest that their combination may enhance postoperative recovery by improving pain control while reducing opioid use.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB improves the quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery compared with TAPB alone. This study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence to guide the development of an optimized multimodal analgesia strategy for patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.

Read the detailed description

All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral transversus abdominis plane block. The intervention group will additionally receive intrathecal morphine, whereas the control group will receive intrathecal saline. After entering the operating room, routine monitoring will include electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide. Prior to anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group will undergo lumbar intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3/4 or L4/5 or L5/S1 interspace. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, intrathecal morphine will be administered at a dose of 2 ug/kg. The control group will receive an equivalent volume of intrathecal normal saline under identical conditions.

General anesthesia will be induced with intravenous dexmedetomidine (0.5 ug/kg), Propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), remifentanil (TCI 4 ng/mL), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), followed by endotracheal intubation. Bilateral TAPB will be performed in all patients under ultrasound guidance. A total of 60 mL of diluted bupivacaine liposome (20 mL: 266 mg diluted to 60 mL with normal saline) will be administered, with 15 mL injected at each of the bilateral subcostal and lateral approaches (total 60 mL). Anesthesia maintenance will include 1.0-1.3 MAC desflurane, remifentanil, sufentanil, rocuronium, and vasoactive medications as required. Intraoperative opioid consumption will be recorded.

Postoperative analgesia will be provided using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), consisting of 100 mg morphine diluted to a total volume of 100 mL. The PCA settings will include no background dose, a 1-mL bolus dose, and a 6-minute lockout interval. In cases of adverse events such as hypotension, fluid resuscitation and vasoactive support will be provided, and PCA parameters may be reduced or discontinued by an independent nurse if necessary.

The primary outcome of this study is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and other opioid-related adverse events. This trial aims to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB provides superior analgesia and improves recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

Keywords

  • laparoscopic gynecological surgery
  • QoR-15
  • Intrathecal morphine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,644 studies on the registry; 602 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients aged ≥18 years.
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia.
  • Allergy to morphine or local anesthetics.
  • Long-term opioid use (>20 morphine milligram equivalents per day).
  • Baseline NRS pain score >3.
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to cooperate.
  • Emergency or non-elective surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
252 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intrathecal morphine group

    Before anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group received an intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace. The intrathecal morphine dose was 2 μg/kg.

    Procedure: Intrathecal morphine group · Procedure: TAPB

  • Active comparator
    Normal saline group

    Before anesthesia induction, patients in the control group received an intrathecal injection of an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace.

    Procedure: Intrathecal saline injection · Procedure: TAPB

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntrathecal morphine group

    With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and intrathecal morphine was injected following confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow.

  • ProcedureTAPB

    With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

  • ProcedureIntrathecal saline injection

    With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline was injected after confirming cerebrospinal fluid flow.

  • ProcedureTAPB

    With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. QoR-15 score at 24 hours after surgery

    The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing postoperative recovery across five domains (pain, physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, and psychological support). Total scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. QoR-15 score at 48 and 72 hours postoperatively

    The QoR-15 total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.

    Time frame: 48 and 72 hours after surgery

  2. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at rest and cough at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

  3. Rest and cough NRS scores in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity

    Time frame: 30 minutes after surgery

  4. Cumulative morphine equivalent consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

  5. Time to first postoperative flatus

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery

  6. Time to first ambulation after surgery

    Time from surgery to the first postoperative ambulation.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery

  7. Urinary catheter indwelling time

    Time from surgery to urinary catheter removal.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery

  8. Time to first analgesic request

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  9. Total amount of additional analgesic medication at 24, 48, 72 hours postoperatively

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

  10. Patient satisfaction assessed by a 0-100 numeric scale

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest level of satisfaction and 100 indicates the highest level of satisfaction.

    Time frame: At 72 hours after surgery

  11. Length of hospital stay (days)

    Length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days from surgery to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From surgery to hospital discharge

  12. Incidence of postoperative shoulder pain assessed by the NRS

    Postoperative shoulder pain will be assessed by patient report, defined as the presence of shoulder pain with a NRS score ≥1 during the postoperative period.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  13. Incidence of adverse events at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

    Postoperative adverse events include hypotension, dizziness, pruritus, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, assessed by clinical observation and medical records.

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

  14. Incidence of chronic pain at 3 months and 6 months after surgery

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
    Guangdong, Guangzhou, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07322029
Lead sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Responsible party
RenChun Lai (Clinical Professor, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
Start date
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Renchun Lai, MD
Contact
lairch@sysucc.org.cn
+8613660012343

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion