CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07318493TriclosanUpdated Jan 21, 2026

Antiseptic-Coated Sutures and Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy

An interventional study of Standard (non-antiseptic coated) suture will be used. and Triclosan/antiseptic -coated suture in Pancreatoduodenectomy and Whipple Procedure, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
436
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of antiseptic-coated sutures is better than the use of the standard sutures in preventing postoperative fistulas within 90 days after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized-controlled trial comparing the rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. This is a superiority study designed to determine whether the use of antiseptic-coated sutures (intervention arm) is superior to standard sutures (control arm) in regard to clinically significant POPF within 90 days following pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients will be randomized to receive either a pancreatoduodenectomy surgery utilizing antiseptic coated sutures or with non-coated standard sutures. The study hypothesize that the use of antiseptic-coated sutures will be associated with a reduction in the rate of POPF. Both sutures are currently available at our center and utilized in the procedure of interest.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatoduodenectomy
  • Whipple Procedure

Keywords

  • pancreatoduodenectomy
  • whipple procedure
  • sutures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 819 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be undergoing a scheduled pancreatoduodenectomy.
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients \< 18 years old
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with history of previous pancreatic surgery
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
436 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Standard (non-antiseptic coated) suture will be used.

    You will undergo your primary surgery per standard practice at the discretion of your surgeon. Standard Sutures will be used during your operation.

    Device: Standard (non-antiseptic coated) suture will be used.

  • Other
    Triclosan/antiseptic -coated suture

    You will undergo your primary surgery per standard practice at the discretion of your surgeon. Triclosan/antiseptic -coated suture will be used. Ethicon PDSTM Plus Antibacterial Suture will be used at the layer of the pancreatojejunostomy and for the duration of the case.

    Device: Triclosan/antiseptic -coated suture

Interventions

  • DeviceStandard (non-antiseptic coated) suture will be used.

    This is an operation to treat tumors and other conditions in the pancreas, small intestine, and bile ducts. It involves removing the head of the pancreas, the first part of the small intestine, the gallbladder, and the bile duct. Part of the procedure involves sutures. A suture(s) is a stitch or row of stitches holding together the edges of a wound or surgical incision

  • DeviceTriclosan/antiseptic -coated suture

    Triclosan/antiseptic -coated suture will be used. Ethicon PDSTM Plus Antibacterial Suture will be used at the layer of the pancreatojejunostomy and for the duration of the case.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula

    comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula- Biochemical leak

    Time frame: up to 90 days post-operative

  2. Comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula

    Comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula-Grade B

    Time frame: up to 90 days post-operative

  3. Comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula

    Comparison of the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula-Grade C

    Time frame: up to 90-day post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Rate of clinically significant POPF

    Improvement in Rate of clinically significant POPF (Grade B and C defined by ISGLS definition)

    Time frame: up to 90-days post-operative

  2. Improvement in SSI rates between groups using CDC classification

    Improvement in SSI rates between groups using CDC classification (superficial, deep, organ space)

    Time frame: up to 90-days post-operative

  3. Hospital Length of Stay

    Duration of hospital admission, measured in days, during index presentation for pancreatoduodenectomy. This will subsequently be compared among our two cohorts (standard suture vs antiseptic suture)

    Time frame: up to 90-day post operative

  4. Length of ICU stay

    Duration of Intensive care unit admission, measured in days, during index presentation for pancreatoduodenectomy, or during convalescence from surgery. This will subsequently be compared among our two cohorts (standard suture vs antiseptic suture)

    Time frame: up to 90-day post operative

  5. Surgical Site Infection

    An infection that occurs in the part of the body where the surgery took place and includes superficial, deep, and organ space infections

    Time frame: up to 90-day post operative

  6. Surgical site occurrence

    Non-healing incisional wound, fascial disruption, skin or soft tissue ischemia, skin or soft tissue necrosis, wound serous or purulent drainage, stitch abscess, seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, and enterocutaneous fistula

    Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative

  7. Surgical Site Occurrence requiring Procedural Intervention

    Interventions to address wound healing issues or complications including wound opening or debridement, suture excision, percutaneous drainage. This includes to address superficial, deep, and organ space healing concerns

    Time frame: up to 90 days post-operative

  8. Post operative pancreatic fistula interventions

    Postoperative interventions related to clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic leak (defined by 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula) including percutaneous, endoscopic and surgical interventions.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic Akron
    Akron, Ohio 44307, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital
    Fairview, Ohio 44111, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shubert CR, Wagie AE, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Que FG, Reid Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Smoot RL, Kendrick ML. Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Sep;221(3):689-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 26296680 ↗
  • Shubert CR, Kendrick ML, Habermann EB, Glasgow AE, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Cleary SP, Smoot RL, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Truty MJ, Que FG. Implementation of prospective, surgeon-driven, risk-based pathway for pancreatoduodenectomy results in improved clinical outcomes and first year cost savings of $1 million. Surgery. 2018 Mar;163(3):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Dec 21. PubMed 29275974 ↗
  • Ocuin LM, Loftus A, Elshami M, Hue JJ, Musonza T, Ammori JB, Winter JM, Hardacre JM. Extended antibiotic therapy is associated with a lower rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk patients: A single-institution analysis. Surgery. 2024 Feb;175(2):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.049. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PubMed 37940433 ↗
  • Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS, Townsend CM Jr, Freeman JL. Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surgery. 2008 Aug;144(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.041. PubMed 18656618 ↗
  • Krautz C, Nimptsch U, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grutzmann R. Effect of Hospital Volume on In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):411-417. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002248. PubMed 28379871 ↗
  • Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28. PubMed 28040257 ↗
  • Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr 28;11(16):2456-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456. PubMed 15832417 ↗
  • Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;133(10):1094-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1094. PubMed 9790207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07318493
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Collaborators
Ethicon, Inc.
Responsible party
Toms Augustin (Medical Director (Main Campus) - Safety, Quality and Patient Experience, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2026
Start date
Jan 13, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Study contacts

Christine Moegling, BS
Contact
Drabekc@ccf.org
216 399-4706
Toms Augustin, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion