CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07314099BFB-IMPACTUpdated Jan 2, 2026

Impact Evaluation of Breizh Fabribus Intervention for Personalized Assistive Technology Creation or Adaptation

An observational study in Amputation, Functional Limitation and Autonomy of Older People, sponsored by Fondation Ildys. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-02.

Sponsored by Fondation Ildys · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
70
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In France, more than 14 million individuals report severe functional limitations, and nearly 5 million struggle with essential daily activities. Traditional barriers to assistive technology-high costs, lengthy funding delays, lack of information, and poorly fitting off-the-shelf solutions-frequently lead to underuse, dissatisfaction, and environmental waste The BFB-IMPACT study evaluates the real-world effectiveness of Breizh Fabribus, a mobile workshop equipped with 3D printing and laser-cutting that produces and customizes assistive devices on site for people with disabilities in Finistère, France region. This retrospective, single-center investigation includes all service recipients from January 2024 to December 2025 and measures changes in users' ability to perform targeted activities at three months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include user satisfaction and device utilization. Data collection occurs from October 2025 to May 2026, with analysis anticipated in June 2026 and results published in the second half of 2026.

Read the detailed description

The BFB-IMPACT protocol is a retrospective, mixed-methods study designed to assess Breizh Fabribus's impact on daily functioning and satisfaction among people with disabilities. All individuals who received at least one assistive device from Breizh Fabribus between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2025, are identified via routine service records. Eligible participants and their caregivers are contacted by phone or mail and provided with study information and a consent form. Upon consent, baseline data-including demographics, medical history, and the nature of the activity difficulty-are extracted from initial request forms.

At the time of device delivery, each participant completes the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) to capture immediate feedback on device fit, usability, and co-creation experience. Three months later, participants receive a standardized follow-up questionnaire addressing: frequency of device use; changes in exposure to the originally problematic activity, rated on a five-point ordinal scale; satisfaction with device performance; and open-ended comments on barriers or facilitators. Data collection is conducted via secure online surveys or postal forms, with up to two reminders for nonresponders. An optional twelve-month follow-up is offered within the scheduled data-collection window (October 2025-May 2026) to explore longer-term durability of benefits.

The primary endpoint compares baseline and three-month follow-up scores on the activity exposure scale using paired statistical tests. Secondary analyses include trends in satisfaction scores, logistic regression to identify predictors of device adoption, and inductive content analysis of open-text feedback.

Data collection concludes in May 2026. Analysis is planned for June 2026, followed by manuscript preparation and dissemination to stakeholders in the second half of 2026. Continuous monitoring by the study coordinator ensures protocol adherence, timely follow-up, and resolution of any deviations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Functional Limitation
  • Autonomy of Older People
  • Handicaps Physical
  • Autonomy

Keywords

  • mobile workshop
  • 3D printing
  • laser cutting
  • personalized devices
  • user satisfaction
  • functionnal autonomy
  • disability
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fondation Ildys is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants are Finistère's habitants, and have received help and creation from BFB.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any person who has received assistance from BFB for the creation or adaptation of assistive technology

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • objection to the use of their data
  • Sollicitation but no delivery of technical assistance by BFB
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in frequency of exposure to the index activity limitation at three months post-intervention

    Change in the frequency with which participants encounter their initial activity limitation, measured via a standardized 5-point ordinal scale at baseline and at three months post-intervention. On this scale, 1 represents "never exposed to the activity limitation" and 5 indicates "exposed every day." Lower scores correspond to less frequent difficulty, while higher scores reflect more frequent difficulty with the targeted activity. This outcome assesses the impact of the personalized assistive device provided by Breizh Fabribus.

    Time frame: Three months following delivery of the personalized assistive device.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with the Assistive Device

    Participant satisfaction measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8: range 8-32, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at delivery and by the ESAT Satisfaction Scale (range: 0-10, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at three months.

    Time frame: At device delivery and three months post-intervention.

  2. Frequency of Device Use

    Self-reported frequency of use in the targeted activity, measured using a 5-point Device Use Frequency Scale (1 = never, 5 = every day; higher values indicate more frequent use).

    Time frame: Three months post-intervention

  3. Barriers to Device Utilization

    Open-ended responses analyzed for reported barriers to use. Qualitative analysis.

    Time frame: Three months post-intervention.

  4. Influence of Sociodemographic Factors

    Analysis of association between demographic characteristics and outcome measures based on CSQ-8, ESAT, and Device Use Frequency Scale.

    Time frame: Three months post-intervention.

  5. Reasons for Requesting the Assistive Device

    Qualitative coding of motivations as reported by participants at intake.

    Time frame: At baseline (device request/intake).

Other outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with the Assistive Device (12 Months)

    Participant satisfaction assessed using the ESAT Satisfaction Scale (range: 0-10, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at twelve months post-intervention.

    Time frame: Twelve months post-intervention.

  2. Frequency of Device Use (12 Months)

    Self-reported frequency of use in the targeted activity, measured using the 5-point Device Use Frequency Scale (1 = never, 5 = every day; higher scores indicate more frequent use) at twelve months.

    Time frame: Twelve months post-intervention.

  3. Barriers to Device Utilization (12 Months)

    Open-ended responses analyzed for reported barriers to use of the assistive device, assessed at twelve months post-intervention, qualitative data only.

    Time frame: Twelve months post-intervention.

  4. Change in Exposure to Activity Limitation (12 Months)

    Change in the frequency with which participants encounter the initial activity limitation, measured via a standardized 5-point ordinal scale (1 = never, 5 = every day) at baseline and twelve months post-intervention.

    Time frame: Twelve months post-intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Fondation ILDYS
    Brest, Finistère 29200, France
    • VALLEE · Contact · 0298293939
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07314099
Lead sponsor
Fondation Ildys
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 2, 2026
Start date
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 2, 2026

Study contacts

Matthieu PICHELIN
Contact
rcpromotion@ildys.org
02 98 02 11 36

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion