CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07299695MERCURION-IPFUpdated Mar 16, 2026

Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and Usual treatment in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by Argyrios Tzouvelekis. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-16.

Sponsored by Argyrios Tzouvelekis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
196
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are sudden and severe worsening episodes that can be life-threatening. Currently, no treatment has been proven to clearly improve outcomes during these events. Inflammation and immune system imbalance are thought to play an important role in causing AE-IPF. Early clinical experience suggests that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) can be beneficial for patients suffering from AE-IPF. This clinical trial aims to determine whether adding IVIG to usual treatment can improve outcomes for patients hospitalized with AE-IPF.

Read the detailed description

Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are sudden, life-threatening deteriorations associated with high mortality. Despite their severe impact on a substantial subset of patients with IPF, no treatment has yet demonstrated clear, reproducible benefit, and standardized therapeutic strategies remain lacking.

This prospective, multicenter, randomized study aims to address this critical unmet need by evaluating the efficacy of IVIG in patients with AE-IPF.

Aberrant inflammation and dysregulated immune responses are believed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of AE-IPF. Patients with IPF often display impaired cellular and humoral immunity, further supporting the investigation of immunomodulatory therapies. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has established anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, is used in other rapidly progressive interstitial lung diseases and in various immune-mediated conditions. Preliminary retrospective data from investigators' center suggest that IVIG may improve gas exchange and survival in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of fibrotic interstitial lung disease, including IPF.

Investigators hypothesize that the addition of IVIG to usual treatment may improve clinically relevant outcomes during AE-IPF. In this study, IVIG will be administered as an adjunct to usual care. Usual care will include pulse corticosteroids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, prophylactic anticoagulation, and oxygen therapy. Although the effectiveness of corticosteroids in AE-IPF remains uncertain and is supported only by low-quality evidence, their use is endorsed by current treatment guidelines and remains widespread in clinical practice. In addition, corticosteroids are being evaluated in ongoing trials (e.g., EXAFIP2, NCT05674994). Considering the complex, multi-pathway biology of AE-IPF and the documented synergistic effects of IVIG and corticosteroids in other immune-mediated conditions (such as Kawasaki disease, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevens-Johnson syndrome), corticosteroids will be administered to both study arms to avoid withholding a potentially beneficial therapy.

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether IVIG, when added to usual care, improves outcomes compared to usual care alone in patients hospitalized with AE-IPF. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause in-hospital mortality or the need for endotracheal intubation. This composite measure was selected because AE-IPF is a rapidly progressive and life-threatening event, and these outcomes represent the most objective, clinically meaningful indicators of deterioration. The use of this endpoint enables a comprehensive assessment of treatment efficacy by capturing both fatal and near-fatal clinical events.

Investigators anticipate that the findings of this study will generate important evidence regarding the potential role of IVIG in the management of AE-IPF and may contribute to future treatment recommendations for this highly lethal condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Intravenous Immunoglobulin
  • Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
03

In context

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

551 studies on the registry are indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 196 is above the median of 54 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Browse Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Argyrios Tzouvelekis as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Patients with IPF diagnosis that fulfils ATS/ERS Consensus Criteria.
  3. Patients hospitalised with a definite or suspected AE-IPF diagnosis, as defined by the international working group criteria and as ascertained by the responsible Primary Investigator.

    The criteria of IPF-AE are as follows:

    • Previous or concurrent diagnosis of IPF
    • Acute worsening or development of dyspnoea typically \< 1 month duration
    • Computed tomography with new bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or consolidation superimposed on a background pattern consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern
    • Deterioration not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload Patients who fail to meet all 4 criteria due to missing computed tomography should be considered as having "suspected Acute Exacerbation".

    A) If the diagnosis of IPF is not previously established, this criterion can be met by the presence of radiologic and/or histopathologic changes consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the current evaluation.

    B) If no previous computed tomography is available, the qualifier "new" can be dropped from the third AE-IPF criterion.

  4. Patient able to understand and sign a written informed consent form. In case of incapacity of the patient, the written informed consent form will be signed by the patients' legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute worsening due to uncontrolled heart failure or pulmonary embolism.
  2. Patients with known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids, IVIG or any component of the study treatment.
  3. Patients with known IgA deficiency (IgA level \<7 mg/dL)- to preclude IVIG reactions.
  4. Patients without a definite diagnosis of IPF or AE-IPF based on clinical, radiological, laboratory evaluation, and multidisciplinary discussion.
  5. Patients with active malignancy or currently receiving cancer treatment, except for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or low-risk prostate cancer (T1 or T2a stage with PSA \<10 ng/dL). These criteria are aligned with current guidelines.
  6. Patients that have received treatment for >14 days within the preceding month with >20mg daily prednisone (or equivalent) or any treatment during the last month with immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate etc.) according to already published therapeutic protocols or > 1 mg/kg/d from more than 7 days in the last 15 days.
  7. Patients participating to another interventional clinical trial.
  8. Patients with documented pregnancy or lactation.
  9. Patients under tutorship or curatorship.
  10. Patients deprived of liberty or under court protection.
  11. Patients who refuse to participate or decline to provide written informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
196 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual treatment

    Usual treatment will consist of broad-spectrum antibiotics, pulse methylprednisolone, prophylactic anticoagulation, and oxygen therapy with high-flow nasal cannula and will be provided to all participants, in both treatment arms.

    Drug: Usual treatment

  • Experimental
    Intravenous immunoglobulin plus Usual treatment

    Intravenous immunoglobulin will be administered along with usual treatment, as described.

    Drug: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)

Interventions

  • DrugIntravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)

    Total dose of 1 g/kg, divided over three consecutive days. The infusion will start at a rate of 0.5 mg/kg/hour for the first 15 minutes and, if no adverse reaction occurs, the rate will then be gradually increased step-wise as tolerated. Premedication with acetaminophen and levocetirizine. Usual treatment will be co-administered, as described.

  • DrugUsual treatment

    1. Corticosteroids: A pulse regimen of IV methylprednisolone at 250 mg daily (days 1 to 3), with no additional corticosteroids thereafter. 2. Antibiotics: Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics starting from the first 24 hours of hospitalization - respiratory quinolone and/or an antipseudomonal penicillin. Duration or escalation of antibiotics may be adjusted based on available antibiograms or treating physician's clinical judgment. 3. Anticoagulation: Prophylactic-dose anticoagulation - low molecular weight heparin or fondaparinux - throughout hospitalization. Patients with an established indication for therapeutic anticoagulation will be maintained on their therapeutic regimen. 4. Antifibrotic therapy: Antifibrotics (nintedanib, pirfenidone, or nerandomilast) will be continued during hospitalization if already prescribed and not contraindicated. No new antifibrotic treatment will be initiated during the study period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause in-hospital mortality or intubation

    This outcome corresponds to the all-cause mortality or intubation rate throughout hospitalisation.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the outcome mesure - the date of death from any cause or the date of endotracheal intubation, whichever comes first - assessed up to 4 weeks during hospitalisation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause 30-day mortality

    This outcome corresponds to all-cause mortality rate at Day 30

    Time frame: 30 days from hospital admission

  2. All-cause 90-day mortality

    This outcome corresponds to all-cause mortality rate at Day 90

    Time frame: 90 days from hospital admission

  3. Hospital readmissions

    This outcome corresponds to all-cause hospital readmission rates by Day 180

    Time frame: 180 days from hospital admission

  4. New acute exacerbation IPF

    This outcome corresponds to occurence of new acute exacerbation of IPF by Day 180

    Time frame: 180 days from hospital admission

  5. Change in PaO₂/FiO₂ Ratio

    This outcome corresponds to the change in the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio from hospital admission to discharge and will be assessed only among survivors

    Time frame: PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio will be assessed at the day of randomisation prior to therapeutic interventions (except oxygen therapy) and then at the day of hospital discharge - up to 4 weeks post randomisation.

  6. Adverse events

    This outcomes corresponds to the presence of adverse events attributable to the trial intervention

    Time frame: Throughout study completion - an average of 1 year (from randomisation until day 365 of follow up, if feasible)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in FVC

    This outcome corresponds to the absolute and change in percent Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) before acute exacerbation (if available) and at Day 90.

    Time frame: 90 days from hospital admission

  2. Change in DLCO

    This outcome corresponds to the absolute change in percent diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) before acute exacerbation (if available) and at Day 90.

    Time frame: 90 days from hospital admission

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Patras
    Pátrai, 26504, Greece
    • Argyrios Tzouvelekis, MD, MSc, PhD, Professor of Respiratory Medicine · Contact · atzouvelekis@upatras.gr · +302613603524
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sotiropoulou V, Sampsonas F, Vasarmidi E, Antoniou K, Gogali A, Kostikas K, Drakopanagiotakis F, Steiropoulos P, Margaritopoulos G, Porpodis K, Daniil Z, Tomos I, Papanikolaou I, Tzilas V, Loukides S, Tzouvelekis A. Design of the MERCURION-IPF trial - intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Front Immunol. 2026 May 5;17:1777564. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1777564. eCollection 2026. PubMed 42164489 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07299695
Lead sponsor
Argyrios Tzouvelekis
Responsible party
Argyrios Tzouvelekis (Professor of Internal and Respiratory Medicine, Head Department of Respiratory Medicine University of Patras, Greece - Associate Professor Adjunct, PCCSM, Yale School of Medicine, USA, University General Hospital of Patras) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2025
Start date
Jan 25, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 16, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion