ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07292246ATHENA IUpdated Dec 18, 2025

A Prospective CohorT Study of HandX - Assisted ENdoscopic MAstectomy: Feasibility and Safety (ATHENA I Study)

An interventional study of Endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy and HandX endoscopic instrument in Breast Cancer, BRCA 1 Gene Mutation and BRCA 2 Gene Mutation, sponsored by Vasileios Kalles. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Primary conditionCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingRegistry: Breast NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Breast Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, a narrower term within Breast Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Vasileios Kalles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to learn whether a handheld robotic device, called the HandX, can help surgeons safely perform a minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy. This type of mastectomy uses a small incision at the side of the breast to remove breast tissue while keeping the skin and nipple in place. The goal is to lower scarring, improve comfort, and support good cosmetic results after surgery.

Participants in this study will already be planning to have a therapeutic or preventive mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction. All surgeries are done at Mediterraneo Hospital in Greece.

During the operation, surgeons use the HandX device to assist with the endoscopic dissection. Researchers will collect information about how long the surgery takes, whether the planned approach can be completed without switching to open surgery, and whether any surgical complications occur. They will also check healing, infection, and implant-related problems for up to 365 days after surgery. Participants will complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire before surgery and at several times after surgery to share their views on comfort, well-being, and cosmetic outcomes.

About 15 participants will take part. The results will help researchers understand whether this approach is practical and safe, and whether it should be studied further in a larger trial.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm interventional study designed to evaluate the feasibility and surgical safety of HandX-assisted endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. The HandX system is a handheld articulating robotic instrument that provides wrist-like motion, motion scaling, and ergonomic control. Unlike console-based robotic platforms, HandX integrates into standard minimally invasive workflows without the need for a large footprint, dedicated console, or complex docking procedures. Early clinical experience in other surgical specialties suggests that the technology may improve access and ergonomics during dissection while maintaining procedural efficiency. This study investigates its use specifically in endoscopic breast surgery, where instrument articulation and visualization are key technical challenges.

All participants will undergo the mastectomy through a single lateral mammary fold incision. Following tumescent injection and creation of a working space, a single-port device is placed, and CO₂ insufflation is used to establish the operative cavity. The HandX device is then employed for endoscopic dissection of the breast gland from the skin envelope and the nipple-areola complex. Specimen retrieval is performed through the same incision. Reconstruction is completed using implant-based techniques (prepectoral, dual-plane, PU-coated, or subpectoral), according to preoperative planning and standard practice. Axillary procedures (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection) may be performed through the same incision when indicated.

The study focuses on technical feasibility-specifically, the ability to complete the endoscopic mastectomy using the HandX platform without unplanned conversion to an open approach. Technical success is defined in the protocol and includes completion of all key steps of the planned minimally invasive procedure. Adjunct use of standard laparoscopic instruments or minor incision extensions for specimen handling does not constitute conversion, provided that the minimally invasive workflow is preserved.

Safety outcomes include intraoperative complications, 30-day and 90-day postoperative adverse events, surgical site infections assessed according to CDC/NHSN definitions, implant-related complications, and implant loss through one year. Postoperative care follows standardized pathways for implant-based reconstruction, including consistent antibiotic and VTE prophylaxis policies and predefined criteria for drain management. Participants are reviewed at scheduled visits through postoperative day 28, with additional follow-up through day 90 for infection surveillance, and through one year for implant-related outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes are assessed using the BREAST-Q® Reconstruction Module (Version 2.0), administered preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 6, and 12. These measures provide data on satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial and sexual well-being, physical well-being of the chest, and satisfaction with aspects of care. Only implant-reconstruction-relevant scales are used.

All data are collected in electronic case report forms, stored securely, and managed in compliance with GDPR and institutional policies. Monitoring is internal due to the single-center pilot nature of the study.

The study plans to accrue up to 20 mastectomy cases, corresponding to approximately 15 participants, as bilateral procedures are counted per breast. The sample size of 20 cases is consistent with recommendations for feasibility studies intended to inform future multicenter comparative trials. Analyses are descriptive. Technical success, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes will be summarized with confidence intervals. Progression criteria and stopping rules are predefined in the protocol, including thresholds for major complications, device-related serious events, and oncologic or surgical concerns that may warrant pause or termination of the study.

Findings from this pilot study will inform the development of larger controlled trials evaluating the comparative effectiveness, aesthetic outcomes, recovery profiles, and cost implications of HandX-assisted endoscopic mastectomy relative to other surgical approaches.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • BRCA 1 Gene Mutation
  • BRCA 2 Gene Mutation
  • Hereditary Breast Carcinoma
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • DCIS
  • Germline Mutation Abnormality
  • Early Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • mastectomy
  • endoscopic
  • robotic
  • handx
  • nipple-sparing mastectomy
03

In context

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating Reclassified

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 66 across 208 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating.

Browse Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Vasileios Kalles as lead sponsor.

Compared within Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Breast Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Indication for therapeutic or prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy for:

    1. early invasive breast cancer (Clinical Stage I-II at diagnosis) undergoing primary surgery
    2. early invasive breast cancer (Clinical Stage I-II at diagnosis) undergoing surgery post systemic () therapy with clinical evidence of partial or complete response
    3. ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or
    4. BRCA or other breast cancer - related genetic mutation carriers, or
    5. high risk for development of breast cancer.
  • Breast volume: cup sizes A to C as defined by underwear size, expected implant volume \<550cc and glandular ptosis not exceeding Grade I Regnault's classification.
  • / WHO Performance Status \<2
  • Subject with signed and dated form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chest wall or skin invasion
  • Extended lymph node involvement at diagnosis (cN2)
  • Inflammatory breast cancer
  • Tumor distance from nipple - areola complex \<1cm on imaging studies
  • Active smoking/nicotine use within 4 weeks pre-op (combustible tobacco, vaping, nicotine pouches, NRT)
  • >35
  • High risk patients with severe and poorly controlled co-morbid conditions (including but not limited to diabetes, heart disease, renal failure or liver dysfunction)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Psychiatric, addictive, or any disorders which compromise the ability to give for participation in this study
  • Subject without signed and dated informed consent form
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HandX-assisted endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy

    Patient cohort undergoing endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with use of HandX.

    Procedure: Endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy · Device: HandX endoscopic instrument

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy

    A minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy performed through a single lateral mammary fold incision using endoscopic visualization and CO₂ insufflation. Breast tissue is dissected from the skin envelope and nipple-areola complex, and immediate implant-based reconstruction is performed according to standard practice. The HandX device is used for articulating endoscopic dissection.

  • DeviceHandX endoscopic instrument

    A handheld articulating endoscopic instrument used to assist with endoscopic dissection during nipple-sparing mastectomy. The HandX device provides wrist-like articulation, motion scaling, and ergonomic control during minimally invasive surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical success

    Completion of the planned procedure via the minimally invasive approach without unplanned conversion.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)

  2. Surgical Safety

    Major (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) complications

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 0-30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative Time

    Total Operative Time

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)

  2. Blood Loss

    Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)

  3. Length of Stay

    Length of hospital stay in days

    Time frame: From hospitalization to discharge (average 1-3 days)

  4. Complications

    30-day complication rate (Clavien-Dindo)

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  5. Skin flap necrosis

    The presence of skin flap necrosis will be noted during all the visits after the surgery (POD 7, 14, 28).

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  6. Nipple Areola Complex ischemia

    Nipple-Areola-Complex (NAC) Ischemia noted during all the visits after the surgery (POD 7, 14, 28)

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  7. Surgical Site Infection

    Number of participants with SSI (CDC/NHSN). Superficial incisional primary (SIP) within 30 days; deep incisional primary (DIP) and organ/space (O/S) within 90 days after the index BRST procedure.

    Time frame: Within 90 days after surgery

  8. Implant loss

    Need to remove the implant for any reason

    Time frame: Within 1 year after surgery

  9. Short - term Oncologic Adequacy

    Negative surgical margins on final pathology-retroareolar (nipple) margin negative and no tumor on ink on any sampled skin-flap or deep margin

    Time frame: Within 40 days after surgery

  10. PROMs - Aesthetic Outcome

    BREAST-Q© questionnaire Version 2.0 measure the quality of life and satisfaction among patients undergoing breast surgery - Reconstruction module pre and postoperative, higher scores reflect a better outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperatively up to 4 weeks, 1 month postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 12 months postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mediterraneo Hospital
    Glyfada, Attica 16675, Greece
    Recruiting
    • Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS · Contactvassilis_kalles@yahoo.gr · 00306973746477
    • Ioannis Papapanagiotou, MD, MSc, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Apostolos Mitrousias, MD, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Sandra Maria Tsoti, MD, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available. PubMed 28692558 ↗
  • Jain Y, Lanjewar R, Shinde RK. Revolutionising Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Innovations in Breast Surgery and Reconstruction. Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52695. eCollection 2024 Jan. PubMed 38384645 ↗
  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PubMed 27810700 ↗
  • Khan MF, Kearns E, Cahill RA. Clinical Experience of a Smart Articulating Digital Device for Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Dec 1;66(12):e1265-e1268. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002987. Epub 2023 Sep 25. PubMed 37787571 ↗
  • Mao R, Gao L, Gang W, Wen L. Literature Review of Handheld Articulating Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Jan;34(1):47-54. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0366. Epub 2023 Oct 23. PubMed 37870762 ↗
  • Cao L, Shenk R, Miller ME, Towe C. Minimally Invasive Mastectomy Could Achieve Non-inferior Oncological Outcome in Appropriately Selected Patients: Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Am Surg. 2022 Dec;88(12):2893-2898. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011152. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PubMed 33861667 ↗
  • Mok CW, Lai HW. Evolution of minimal access breast surgery. Gland Surg. 2019 Dec;8(6):784-793. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.11.16. PubMed 32042687 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — "Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. This study is a small single-center feasibility trial, and the dataset contains clinical and surgical details that cannot be fully de-identified under GDPR. Summary results will be made available in the ClinicalTrials.gov record after study completion.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2028, 37 months after the start.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, half reached primary completion within 69 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 148. This study's planned 37 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 47 studies reached it within 69 months; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 134.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2025
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
StartActual
Sep 9, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 2029
Last update
Dec 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07292246
Lead sponsor
Vasileios Kalles
Responsible party
Vasileios Kalles (Vasileios Kalles MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS, Consultant Breast & General Surgeon, Director of Mediterraneo Breast Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
Start date
Sep 9, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Study contacts

Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS
Contact
vassilis_kalles@yahoo.gr
00306973746477
Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS
principal investigator · Mediterraneo Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion