CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07278024Updated Dec 11, 2025

Postbiotic Intervention on Vaginal Microbiota

An interventional study of postbiotics in Infertile Women Undergoing IVF or ICSI, sponsored by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study investigates the effects of postbiotic intervention on vaginal microbiota in infertile patients. Using a pre-post test design, we will enroll 15 women aged 30-45 years with at least two IVF failures. Participants will receive postbiotic intervention for 8 weeks. Vaginal secretion samples will be collected before and after treatment for 16S rRNA sequencing analysis to assess microbial composition, dominant species distribution, α-diversity index, and Lactobacillus content. Primary outcomes include changes in vaginal microbiota composition and diversity, alterations in Lactobacillus abundance, and pregnancy rates in subsequent IVF-FET cycles.

Read the detailed description

Background The demand for infertility treatment is increasing, with approximately 10-15% of couples of reproductive age experiencing varying degrees of fertility issues. Vaginal microbiota dysbiosis may be a significant factor contributing to infertility, and a healthy vaginal microbiota environment plays a crucial role in embryo implantation. This study aims to investigate the effects of postbiotic intervention on the vaginal microbiota of infertile patients by analyzing the vaginal microbiota before and after bacteriocin treatment to evaluate its effectiveness in improving the vaginal microbial environment.

Objective This study aims to investigate changes in vaginal microbiota before and after the use of postbiotic intervention.

Methods This study employs a pre-post test design, planning to enroll 15 women aged 30-45 years diagnosed with infertility with at least two IVF treatment failure. All subjects must be free from severe gynecological diseases, not using antibiotics or probiotics, and without acute vaginal infection symptoms. The study period is 8 weeks. Before intervention, baseline data collection will include complete medical history and infertility treatment records. During the first visit, vaginal secretion samples will be collected for vaginal microbiota assessment through 16S rRNA sequencing analysis, simultaneously measuring Lactobacillus content and microbial diversity. Subjects will then use postbiotic intervention continuously for 8 weeks. After treatment, a second sampling will be conducted to re-analyze the vaginal microbiota. The primary outcome measures include changes in microbial composition before and after use, including dominant species distribution, α-diversity index, and changes in Lactobacillus content. All specimens will be collected, transported, and preserved following standard operating procedures to ensure testing quality. Research data will be analyzed using paired sample statistical methods to assess pre-post treatment differences, with significance level set at p\<0.05.

Outcome

  1. Compare differences in vaginal microbiota before and after using postbiotic intervention.
  2. Compare differences in taxonomic abundance before and after using postbiotic intervention.
  3. Check pregnancy rate of IVF-FET cycle after postbiotic intervention use
02

Conditions studied

  • Infertile Women Undergoing IVF or ICSI

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vaginal microbiome
  • postbiotics
  • antimicrobial peptides
  • infertility
  • assisted reproductive technology
  • in vitro fertilization
03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) age 30-45 years;
  • (2) body mass index 18-30 kg/m²;
  • (3) history of ≥2 prior IVF treatment failures despite transfer of good-quality embryos;
  • (4) planned FET cycle;
  • (5) willingness to comply with the eight-week postbiotic intervention protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) active acute vaginal infection with symptomatic presentation;
  • (2) antibiotic or probiotic use within the preceding three months;
  • (3) congenital uterine anomalies including septate, bicornuate, or unicornuate uterus;
  • (4) severe intrauterine adhesions (Asherman syndrome grade III-IV);
  • (5) history of gynecologic malignancy;
  • (6) known allergy or hypersensitivity to Lactobacillus-derived products;
  • (7) current ongoing pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    postbiotics

    Other: postbiotics

Interventions

  • Otherpostbiotics

    Participants will self-administer postbiotic intervention via intravaginal suppositories containing purified bacteriocin peptides . The intervention consists of one suppository administered intravaginally at bedtime, once daily for 8 consecutive weeks (56 days total). Each suppository contains a standardized concentration of bacteriocins extracted from Lactobacillus strains.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vaginal microbiome composition (genus level)

    Changes in vaginal bacterial community structure assessed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of vaginal secretion samples collected at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Taxonomic abundance (%)

    Quantitative measurement of the relative proportions of bacterial taxa at different taxonomic levels (phylum, genus, and species) in vaginal samples before and after bacteriocin treatment. Results will report the percentage abundance of major bacterial groups.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

Other outcomes

  1. Pregnancy rate (%)

    Visualization of fetal cardiac activity on transvaginal ultrasound at 6-7 weeks' gestation

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
    Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumar A, Green KM, Rawat M. A Comprehensive Overview of Postbiotics with a Special Focus on Discovery Techniques and Clinical Applications. Foods. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):2937. doi: 10.3390/foods13182937. PubMed 39335866 ↗
  • Vinderola G, Sanders ME, Salminen S. The Concept of Postbiotics. Foods. 2022 Apr 8;11(8):1077. doi: 10.3390/foods11081077. PubMed 35454664 ↗
  • Salminen S, Collado MC, Endo A, Hill C, Lebeer S, Quigley EMM, Sanders ME, Shamir R, Swann JR, Szajewska H, Vinderola G. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;18(9):649-667. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00440-6. Epub 2021 May 4. PubMed 33948025 ↗
  • Moreno I, Garcia-Grau I, Perez-Villaroya D, Gonzalez-Monfort M, Bahceci M, Barrionuevo MJ, Taguchi S, Puente E, Dimattina M, Lim MW, Meneghini G, Aubuchon M, Leondires M, Izquierdo A, Perez-Olgiati M, Chavez A, Seethram K, Bau D, Gomez C, Valbuena D, Vilella F, Simon C. Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients. Microbiome. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01184-w. PubMed 34980280 ↗
  • Zhao H, Wang C, Narsing Rao MP, Rafiq M, Luo G, Li S, Kang Y-Q. Effects of vaginal microbiota on in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with different infertility causes. Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):e0125524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01255-24. Epub 2025 Jan 27. PubMed 39868783 ↗
  • Karaer A, Dogan B, Gunal S, Tuncay G, Arda Duz S, Unver T, Tecellioglu N. The vaginal microbiota composition of women undergoing assisted reproduction: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2101-2109. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16782. Epub 2021 Jun 20. PubMed 34053157 ↗
  • Tian Q, Jin S, Zhang G, Liu Y, Liu J, Tang X, Li Y, Liu J, Liu Y, Wang Z. Assessing vaginal microbiome through Vaginal Microecology Evaluation System as a predictor for in vitro fertilization outcomes: a retrospective study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 9;15:1380187. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1380187. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39045277 ↗
  • Su W, Gong C, Zhong H, Yang H, Chen Y, Wu X, Jin J, Xi H, Zhao J. Vaginal and endometrial microbiome dysbiosis associated with adverse embryo transfer outcomes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Aug 28;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01274-y. PubMed 39198832 ↗
  • Vainamo S, Saqib S, Kalliala I, Kervinen K, Luiro K, Niinimaki M, Halttunen-Nieminen M, Virtanen S, Nieminen P, Salonen A, Holster T. Longitudinal analysis of vaginal microbiota during IVF fresh embryo transfer and in early pregnancy. Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Dec 12;11(6):e0165023. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01650-23. Epub 2023 Oct 26. PubMed 37882794 ↗
  • Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):223-38. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-15. PubMed 26864580 ↗
  • Gao X, Louwers YV, Laven JSE, Schoenmakers S. Clinical Relevance of Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiome Investigation in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):622. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010622. PubMed 38203793 ↗
  • Koedooder R, Singer M, Schoenmakers S, Savelkoul PHM, Morre SA, de Jonge JD, Poort L, Cuypers WJSS, Beckers NGM, Broekmans FJM, Cohlen BJ, den Hartog JE, Fleischer K, Lambalk CB, Smeenk JMJS, Budding AE, Laven JSE. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1042-1054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez065. PubMed 31119299 ↗
  • Moreno I, Codoner FM, Vilella F, Valbuena D, Martinez-Blanch JF, Jimenez-Almazan J, Alonso R, Alama P, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Ramon D, Simon C. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):684-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. Epub 2016 Oct 4. PubMed 27717732 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07278024
Lead sponsor
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Responsible party
Li-Te Lin (Attending doctor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 11, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025
Completion
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion