CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07277374T-ECGUpdated Dec 11, 2025

Comparison of a Torso-Based Derived 6-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Device With Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Healthy Volunteers

An observational study in Healthy Volunteer, sponsored by Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare electrocardiographic interval measurements obtained from a torso-placed six-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device (torso-derived ECG; T-ECG) with those obtained from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in healthy adult volunteers. The torso-derived device synthesizes limb-lead signals using electrodes positioned on the thorax, potentially allowing for faster and more practical ECG acquisition in emergency department settings, operating rooms, and prehospital environments.

A total of 24 participants undergo both standard 12-lead ECG recording and torso-derived 6-lead ECG recording during the same study session. Heart rate (HR), PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and corrected QT (QTc) values are analyzed using Bland-Altman agreement analysis and correlation testing. The study also evaluates whether anthropometric characteristics-including body mass index (BMI)-influence the compatibility and agreement between the two measurement systems.

Read the detailed description

This observational, single-center clinical study evaluates the agreement between a torso-based derived six-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) system and a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in healthy adult volunteers. The study is conducted at Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital following ethics committee approval (Approval No: 2023/193). Volunteers aged 18 to 65 years without known cardiac disease are enrolled.

Each participant undergoes one standard 12-lead ECG recording followed by a torso-based six-lead ECG recording under identical resting conditions. Electrocardiographic measurements include heart rate (HR), RR interval, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and corrected QT (QTc). Anthropometric characteristics-body weight, height, and body mass index (BMI)-are collected to assess whether body composition influences measurement consistency between the two systems.

Primary analysis includes Bland-Altman agreement statistics and correlation testing between ECG modalities. No drug administration, invasive procedure, randomization, or therapeutic intervention is applied. The study involves minimal risk and is limited to non-invasive surface ECG acquisition.

The expected clinical significance is that, if the torso-based ECG demonstrates measurement compatibility with the standard 12-lead ECG, simplified electrode placement may enable faster ECG acquisition in emergency departments, prehospital evaluations, and clinical scenarios in which limb lead placement is impractical.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteer

Keywords

  • Electrocardiography
  • 6-lead ECG
  • 12-lead ECG
  • Torso ECG
  • ECG comparison
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of healthy adult volunteers without known cardiovascular disease. All participants undergo both standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and torso-derived 6-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording during a single study session. Participants are screened prior to inclusion to ensure the absence of baseline arrhythmia, ischemia, conduction delay, or structural heart disease.

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 65 years

No known cardiovascular disease

No arrhythmia, conduction disorder, or ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes at baseline

Willingness to participate and ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Known cardiac disease, including coronary artery disease (CAD), arrhythmia, heart failure, or valvular heart disease

Pacemaker rhythm or baseline abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings

Thoracic deformity or prior thoracic surgery that prevents appropriate electrode placement

Unwillingness to participate or inability to provide informed consent

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy Volunteer ECG Group

    Participants underwent standard 12-lead ECG and torso-based 6-lead ECG in a single session for comparative interval analysis.

    Device: Torso-Based 6-Lead ECG Recording

Interventions

  • DeviceTorso-Based 6-Lead ECG Recording

    Non-invasive ECG measurement with torso electrode placement for comparison with standard 12-lead ECG.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PR Interval Agreement Between Torso-Derived and Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Mean difference in PR interval between torso-derived six-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and standard 12-lead ECG recordings obtained during the same resting session. Single-session baseline ECG recording.

    Time frame: Single-session baseline ECG recording.

  2. QRS Duration Agreement Between Torso-Derived and Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Mean difference in QRS duration between torso-derived six-lead ECG and standard 12-lead ECG recordings obtained during the same resting session

    Time frame: Single-session baseline ECG recording.

  3. QT Interval Agreement Between Torso-Derived and Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Mean difference in QT interval between torso-derived six-lead ECG and standard 12-lead ECG recordings obtained during the same resting session.

    Time frame: Single-session baseline ECG recording

  4. Heart Rate (HR) Agreement Between Torso-Derived and Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Mean difference in heart rate (HR) between torso-derived six-lead ECG and standard 12-lead ECG recordings obtained during the same resting session.

    Time frame: Single-session baseline ECG recording.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Agreement Between Torso-Derived 6-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements

    Description: Comparison of PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and heart rate (HR) measurements obtained from torso-derived 6-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings to assess measurement concordance. Time Frame: Single-session recording (baseline only)

    Time frame: Single-session recording (baseline only)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital - Emergency Medicine Department
    Istanbul, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the dataset includes only ECG recordings collected from healthy volunteers, and no identifiable patient-level information is stored or retained. Summary results may be shared in publication form, but raw individual-level data will not be publicly available.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07277374
Lead sponsor
Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Sinem Dogruyol (Associate Professor, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 11, 2025
Start date
Dec 6, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 6, 2024
Completion
Jun 6, 2024
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion