CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07273786Updated Dec 10, 2025

The Effects of Group Social Work Intervention on Children's Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Regulation Skills and Empathy Tendencies

An interventional study of group social work practice based on emotion-focused therapy in Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Regulation and Empathy Skills, sponsored by Selcuk University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 9 Years to 11 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-10.

Sponsored by Selcuk University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The general objective of this study is to determine the effects of an emotion-focused therapy-based group social work intervention on the emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency levels of children aged 9-11 years in need of protection and living in a children's home complex, and to explore the participants' experiences of the group intervention. The independent variable of the study is the emotion-focused therapy-based group social work intervention. The dependent variables are the children's emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency levels.

Within the framework of the stated general objective, the quantitative questions addressed in the study are as follows:

  1. Is there a significant difference between the emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency scores between the experimental and control groups before the intervention?
  2. Is there a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency of the participants in the experimental group after the intervention?
  3. After the intervention, is there a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores on emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency of the participants in the control group?
  4. After the intervention, is there a significant difference between the post-test scores on emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency of the participants in the experimental group and the post-test scores on emotion regulation skills, emotional intelligence, and empathic tendency of the participants in the control group?
Read the detailed description

-Participants in the study completed the Children's Emotion Regulation Scale (CRS), the BarOn Emotional Intelligence Test Child and Adolescent Form and the KA-Si Empathic Tendency Scale Child Form before the study began. Following the 12-session group process, the same scales were completed for both the experimental and control groups, and differences between the experimental and control groups were examined.

Some participants had difficulty reading and understanding the scale items during the pretest and posttest evaluation processes. Both tests were administered one-on-one with the participants, and those who did not understand were read one by one. The quantitative data collected were then entered into SPSS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emotional Intelligence
  • Emotion Regulation
  • Empathy Skills

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • emotion-focused therapy
  • group social work
  • child in need of protection
  • emotional intelligence
  • emotion regulation
  • empathic tendency
03

In context

Emotional Regulation

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Emotional Regulation; 121 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 74 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Emotional Regulation.

Browse Emotional Regulation studies →

Lead sponsor

Selcuk University is the lead sponsor of 248 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

    • Be between 9 and 11 years old

      • Be able to read and write
      • Have no known traumatic event/abuse history
      • Have been accepted to the organization for at least 3 months (have adapted to the organization)
      • Have no severe/advanced psychiatric disability/diagnosis
      • Have been declared suitable by the group leader
      • Be willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Being outside the 9-11 age range

      • Being admitted to the institution less than 3 months ago or not yet having adapted to the institution
      • Being a foreign national
      • Not knowing Turkish
      • Having a history of abuse
      • Being hospitalized
      • Being a child who left the institution without permission
      • Being in the final stages of transfer and return to family
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    emotion-focused group social work

    The group where 12 sessions of emotion-focused group social work were conducted

    Behavioral: group social work practice based on emotion-focused therapy

  • No intervention
    no emotion-focused group social work

    no intervention group

Interventions

  • Behavioralgroup social work practice based on emotion-focused therapy

    Emotion-focused therapy, a therapy approach that prioritizes emotions over others, advocates for increasing emotional intelligence, which refers to using emotions as a developmental tool without being dominated by them (Greenberg, 2004b). Emotion-focused therapy, which places emotions at the center, is a practice that has recently become widespread in our country. It is stated that this approach helps individuals identify/be aware of their emotions, express them, make sense of them, appropriately modify/transform them, and use them in a healthy way; as a result, individuals are more successful in taking control of their lives (Greenberg 2010). From this perspective, it is believed that working with children in need of protection using this approach will be beneficial for the children themselves. The results of this study suggest that it may contribute to introducing an emotion-focused perspective into rehabilitative work with children under protection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BarOn Emotional Intelligence Scale Child and Adolescent Form

    This is a 60-item scale, with a minimum score of 60 and a maximum of 240. Higher scores indicate better outcomes, as they indicate improved emotional intelligence skills.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks after registration

  2. Emotion Regulation Scale for Children

    The scale consists of 29 items and four subscales: anger (9 items), fear (8 items), sadness (7 items), and excitement (5 items). The lowest score is 29; the highest is 116. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks after registration

  3. KA-SI Empathic Tendency Scale - Child Form

    The scale consists of 13 items. The minimum score is 13, and the maximum score is 52. As the scale scores increase, empathic tendency increases, and as they decrease, empathic tendency decreases.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks after registration

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Çocuk Evleri Sitesi Müdürlüğü
    Ankara, Pursaklar, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tottenham N, Hare TA, Quinn BT, McCarry TW, Nurse M, Gilhooly T, Millner A, Galvan A, Davidson MC, Eigsti IM, Thomas KM, Freed PJ, Booma ES, Gunnar MR, Altemus M, Aronson J, Casey BJ. Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):46-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00852.x. PubMed 20121862 ↗
  • Tarren-Sweeney M. The mental health of children in out-of-home care. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;21(4):345-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830321fa. PubMed 18520738 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Dec 5, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — I haven't decided yet

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07273786
Lead sponsor
Selcuk University
Collaborators
aile ve sosyal hizmetler bakanlığı
Responsible party
merve özkul (PhD student, Selcuk University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 5, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2025
Completion
Feb 25, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 10, 2025

Study contacts

Serap D DAŞBAŞ, Prof. Dr.
study director · Selçuk Üniversity

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion