An interventional study of Tesla-Chair and Physiotherapy in Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-05.
Sponsored by Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
100 patients with mild to moderate urinary incontinence will be randomly divided into two groups. One half will receive functional magnetic stimulation with the Tesla Chair for three months, while the other half will be treated with pelvic floor physiotherapy for the same period. After three and six months, a comparison will be made to determine which patient groups experience an improvement in urinary incontinence and how their muscle strength improves.
Urinary incontinence is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life, contributing to anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal. The severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is directly correlated with increased physical and psychological burden. Although lifestyle modifications can offer moderate symptom relief, the current gold-standard first-line treatment is pelvic floor physiotherapy, with surgical intervention reserved for refractory cases.
Functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) has demonstrated positive effects in patients with urinary incontinence, including improvements in urodynamic parameters. However, limited research has directly compared the efficacy of FMS as a first-line therapy with standard pelvic floor physiotherapy. Addressing this gap is essential for informing clinical practice and expanding evidence-based therapeutic options. The efficacy of pelvic floor physiotherapy is commonly evaluated using the Oxford Scale, which provides an objective measure of pelvic floor muscle contraction strength. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes are assessed using validated instruments, including the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF UI) and the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (Deutscher Beckenbodenfragebogen), capturing symptom severity and quality of life. Together, these endpoints-objective assessments and patient-reported outcomes-offer a comprehensive evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 66 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.
Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Device: Tesla-Chair
Procedure: Physiotherapy
Magnetic stimulation using the Tesla-Chair
Pelvicfloor physiotherapy
Change in ICIQ-SF UI Score
Change in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form for Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-SF UI) score from baseline to 3 months after treatment; 1-5= slight incontinence, 19-21= very severe incontinence
Time frame: 3 months post-treatment (6 months from baseline)
Change in ICIQ-SF UI Score
Change in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form for Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-SF UI) score from baseline to 6 months after treatment
Time frame: 6-months post-treatment (9 months from baseline)
Change in pelvic floor muscle strength, measured by the Oxford Scale
Change in pelvic floor muscle strength, measured by the Oxford Scale, 0= no contraction, 5= movement against gravity with full resistance.
Time frame: 3 months post-treatment (6 months from baseline)
Change in pelvic floor muscle strength, measured by the Oxford Scale
Change in pelvic floor muscle strength, measured by the Oxford Scale, 0= no contraction, 5= movement against gravity with full resistance.
Time frame: 6 months post-treatment (9 months from baseline)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW