CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07260240IUR-RCTUpdated Aug 17, 2026

Recovery Rate From Category II to Category I EFM Tracings in Pregnant Women Receiving Bolus vs Continuous Intravenous Fluid Administration

An interventional study of Normal saline bolus infusion and Continuous normal saline infusion in Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracing, sponsored by Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized trial compared a normal saline bolus regimen with continuous normal saline infusion. The participants were low-risk pregnant women at term with Category II fetal heart rate tracings. Both groups were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through the same volumetric infusion pump. The bolus group received 500 mL at 1,000 mL/h during the first 30 minutes, followed by 150 mL/h. The continuous group received 150 mL/h throughout. The primary outcome was first recovery from Category II to Category I within 30 minutes. Both groups also received standard intrauterine resuscitation. Fetal heart rate tracings were assessed at 30, 60, and 120 minutes.

Read the detailed description

Intravenous fluid is a component of intrauterine resuscitation for Category II fetal heart rate tracings. No randomized trial had directly compared bolus and continuous intravenous fluid administration.

Both arms were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through a 21-gauge cannula and the same volumetric infusion pump. The bolus group received 500 mL at 1,000 mL/h during the first 30 minutes. The remaining 500 mL was then administered at 150 mL/h. The continuous group received 150 mL/h throughout. Programmed delivery by 30 minutes was approximately 500 mL in the bolus group and 75 mL in the continuous group. Resuscitation continued until the attending declared Category I recovery or until 120 minutes.

Both groups received standard intrauterine resuscitation. This included left lateral positioning, oxytocin discontinuation where applicable, and oxygen at 10 L/min through a face mask.

The primary outcome was first recovery from Category II to Category I within 30 minutes. First Category I recovery was an absorbing endpoint. A later observed Category II classification did not reverse recovered endpoint status. The participant and attending outcome assessor were masked to allocation. Two masked reviewers independently re-adjudicated the fetal heart rate classifications.

A trained operator measured the inferior vena cava collapsibility index and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index at baseline and 30 minutes. The primary analysis used Fisher's exact test, risk difference, relative risk, and number needed to treat.

02

Conditions studied

  • Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracing

Keywords

  • bolus intravenous fluid administration
  • continuous intravenous fluid administration
  • Category II fetal heart rate tracing
  • electronic fetal monitoring
  • intrauterine resuscitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Thai nationality
  • Gestational age of 37 weeks or more
  • Maternal age from 20 to 35 years
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Category II electronic fetal monitoring tracing during labor

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing cardiac, pulmonary, thyroid, or overt diabetic disease
  • Pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes
  • Suspected fetal structural anomaly, growth restriction, arrhythmia, or chromosomal abnormality
  • Recent magnesium sulfate or opioid analgesia
  • Oligohydramnios
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Bolus group

    Participants were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through a 21-gauge cannula and the same volumetric infusion pump. The first 500 mL was administered at 1,000 mL/h during the first 30 minutes. The remaining 500 mL was then administered at 150 mL/h. Resuscitation continued until the attending declared Category I recovery or until 120 minutes.

    Drug: Normal saline bolus infusion

  • Experimental
    Group B: Continuous group

    Participants were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through a 21-gauge cannula and the same volumetric infusion pump. Normal saline was administered at 150 mL/h throughout. Resuscitation continued until the attending declared Category I recovery or until 120 minutes.

    Drug: Continuous normal saline infusion

Interventions

  • DrugNormal saline bolus infusion

    Participants were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through a 21-gauge cannula and the same volumetric infusion pump. The first 500 mL was administered at 1,000 mL/h during the first 30 minutes. The remaining 500 mL was then administered at 150 mL/h. The intervention continued until the attending declared Category I recovery or until 120 minutes.

  • DrugContinuous normal saline infusion

    Participants were prescribed 1,000 mL of normal saline through a 21-gauge cannula and the same volumetric infusion pump. Normal saline was administered continuously at 150 mL/h throughout. The intervention continued until the attending declared Category I recovery or until 120 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. First recovery from Category II to Category I EFM tracing within 30 minutes

    Proportion of participants with first recovery from Category II to Category I electronic fetal monitoring tracing within 30 minutes of intervention initiation, classified using the NICHD three-tier system. First Category I recovery was an absorbing endpoint. A later observed Category II classification did not reverse recovered endpoint status. Non-recovery was persistent Category II or progression to Category III. Classification was performed in real time by the masked attending outcome assessor.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. First recovery from Category II to Category I EFM tracing within 60 minutes

    Cumulative proportion of participants with first recovery from Category II to Category I electronic fetal monitoring tracing within 60 minutes of intervention initiation, classified using the NICHD three-tier system. First Category I recovery was an absorbing endpoint. A later observed Category II classification did not reverse recovered endpoint status. Non-recovery by 60 minutes was persistent Category II or progression to Category III.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  2. First recovery from Category II to Category I EFM tracing within 120 minutes

    Cumulative proportion of participants with first recovery from Category II to Category I electronic fetal monitoring tracing within 120 minutes of intervention initiation, classified using the NICHD three-tier system. First Category I recovery was an absorbing endpoint. A later observed Category II classification did not reverse recovered endpoint status. Non-recovery by 120 minutes was persistent Category II or progression to Category III.

    Time frame: 120 minutes

  3. Mode of delivery

    Route of delivery classified as vaginal delivery or caesarean section.

    Time frame: At delivery

  4. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission

    Proportion of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit following delivery.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of delivery

  5. Apgar score at 1 minute

    Proportion of neonates with 1-minute Apgar score below 7

    Time frame: 1 minute after delivery

  6. Apgar score at 5 minutes

    Proportion of neonates with 5-minute Apgar score below 7

    Time frame: 5 minutes after delivery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
    Si Racha, Changwat Chon Buri 20110, Thailand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data that underlie the reported results may be available from the corresponding author. Direct identifiers will not be shared. Participant confidentiality and the Thailand Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) will apply.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07260240
Lead sponsor
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2025
Start date
Dec 10, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 27, 2026
Completion
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion