CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07258940Updated Dec 2, 2025

NobelZygoma TiUltra Implant System Study

An interventional study of NobelZygoma™ 0° CC TiUltra™implant ; NobelZygoma™ 45° Ext Hex TiUltra™ implant and Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 17° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 45° Multi.Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP; 60° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP in Edentulous Maxilla, Maxillary Bone Loss and Atrophic Maxilla, sponsored by Nobel Biocare. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Sponsored by Nobel Biocare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective study is to assess short term (12-months) clinical outcomes of NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal in the rehabilitation of participants with severely atrophic maxilla treated with zygomatic dental implant procedure. The main goal is to assess the sinusitis occurrence at 12-months after implant insertion. Other objectives are to assess: soft tissue health; biological and technical complication; patient's experience, outcomes (sinonasal symptoms and oral health-related quality of life) and satisfaction; clinician's experience with handling of device and satisfaction; implant, abutment and prosthetic survival and adverse events.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires at pretreatment visit, postoperative visit, and after 6-months and 12-months of implant insertion. At 12-months a radiological exam (CBCT) will be asked for the participant for the evaluation of the radiological condition of the maxillary sinus.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, interventional, multicenter study that is planned to include 9 sites and 85 participants with severely atrophic maxilla (characterized by class V-VI according to the Cawood and Howell's classification). Participants will be consecutively enrolled upon providing informed consent and meeting all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria (details in eligibility section). Zygomatic implant procedure will be performed as per clinician standard of care and participant's anatomy. Both hybrid and quad zygoma techniques, as well as any implant trajectory can be used in the study (e.g. intra-sinus; extra-sinus; sinus slot). Enrolled participants will be treated with NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and respective abutments in accordance with the IFU. All zygomatic implants will be immediately loaded.

The study is designed to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis in participants treated with NobelZygoma TiUltra implants and Multi-unit Abutments Xeal Zygoma.

The working assumption is that the incidence of sinusitis can be reliably measured at 12 months using standardized clinical (SNOT-22) and radiological (Lund-Mackay) criteria in participants rehabilitated with this treatment approach The primary endpoint of this clinical investigation is the specificity of diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis at 12-months post-implant placement using a combination of clinical and radiological evaluation, using SNOT-22 questionnaire and LM (Lund-Mackay) scoring system for the clinical and CBCT analysis respectively. Other endpoint and parameters will be described in Outcome measures section.

All included participants will be followed for 12-months post-implant placement to assess the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of TiUltra-surfaced zygomatic implants and Mulit-unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma. Possible dropouts and withdrawals, as well as possible adverse events, will be monitored during the entire investigation period.

Each participant will be assigned a participant ID to maintain the confidentiality of the collected data, which will be recorded in the dedicated eCRF. The eCRF system meets EU GDPR requirements for safe data handling. The data will be processed by the eCRF provider for storage purposes and further processed and analyzed by the sponsor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Edentulous Maxilla
  • Maxillary Bone Loss
  • Atrophic Maxilla

Keywords

  • "zygomatic implants"; "zygoma implants"
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nobel Biocare is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant has signed the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Participant aged ≥ 18 years at the time of treatment.
  • Medical and anatomical conditions are in accordance with the applicable IFU.
  • Participant with a severely atrophic maxilla classified as Cawood and Howell class V or VI
  • Suitable for immediate loading.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute or chronic maxillary sinusitis.
  • Zygomatic bone pathologies including tumors, infections, or congenital abnormalities
  • History of recurrent sinusitis (≥ 4 occurrences/year)
  • Pre-operative LM score of ≥ 1
  • Uncontrolled systemic disorders including poorly controlled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease.
  • Active malignancy or currently undergoing oncological treatment.
  • History of severe maxillary jaw injury or maxillofacial trauma.
  • Moderate and heavy smokers (defined as > 5 cigarettes a day).
  • Severe bruxism or dysfunctional tendencies
  • Previous oro-maxillofacial radiotherapy.
  • Use of bisphosphonates.
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Implant loaded > 1 week of zygomatic implant placement
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
85 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    NobelZygoma TiUltra implant system in the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae

    Participant will receive zygomatic implant treatment for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla. The treatment will be performed as per standard-of-care and participant's anatomic conditions. The NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma will be used in all study participants.

    Device: NobelZygoma™ 0° CC TiUltra™implant ; NobelZygoma™ 45° Ext Hex TiUltra™ implant · Device: Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 17° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 45° Multi.Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP; 60° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP

Interventions

  • DeviceNobelZygoma™ 0° CC TiUltra™implant ; NobelZygoma™ 45° Ext Hex TiUltra™ implant

    All participants will receive NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal as part of the implant/prosthetic zygomatic rehabilitation procedure. Implants and abutments will be selected as per surgeon preference and participant's need. Radiological exam will be performed at pre-treatment and 12-months follow-up. Patients will be followed-up after placement of implant at 10-days, 6-months and 12-months follow-up. At 12-months a standardized clinical and radiological criteria (using the SNOT-22 and Lund-Mackay respectively) will be used to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis across all study centers for the sinusitis diagnose.

  • DeviceMulti-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 17° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma Ext Hex RP; 45° Multi.Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP; 60° Multi-Unit Abutment Xeal Zygoma CC RP

    All participants will receive NobelZygoma TiUltra implant and Multi-unit Abutment Xeal as part of the implant/prosthetic zygomatic rehabilitation procedure. Implants and abutments will be selected as per surgeon preference and participant's need. Radiological exam will be performed at pre-treatment and 12-months follow-up. Patients will be followed-up after placement of implant at 10-days, 6-months and 12-months follow-up. At 12-months a standardized clinical and radiological criteria (using the SNOT-22 and Lund-Mackay respectively) will be used to describe and quantify the occurrence of maxillary sinusitis across all study centers for the sinusitis diagnose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maxillary sinusitis at 12-months post-implant placement

    The diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis is based on the following criteria: A positive clinical diagnosis is made when all of the following criteria from SNOT-22 are met simultaneously: 1. The participant reports at least two clinical symptoms, one of which must be either: nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, or nasal discharge (anterior or posterior nasal drip). Additional symptoms may include: facial pain or pressure, reduction or loss of smell. 2. There is a clinically significant worsening in symptoms, demonstrated by a ≥12-point increase in the total SNOT-22 score from baseline (pre-treatment). 3. If the participant exhibits partial symptoms or if the diagnosis remains uncertain, the Principal Investigator (PI) will refer the participant to an ENT specialist for further evaluation.

    Time frame: At 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant insertion

Secondary outcomes

  1. PREMs

    Evaluate patient reported experience measures (PREMs) from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up using Likert scale

    Time frame: At pre-treatment; and after 10 days, 6- and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement

  2. Pain assessment

    Assess patient reported pain at postoperative visit using VAS scale (from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain possible)

    Time frame: 10 days after zygomatic implant placement

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Assess patient satisfaction with function and esthetics using VAS scale (from 0 - not satisfied to 100 fully satisfied

    Time frame: 10 days, 6-months and 12-months after zygomatic implant placement

  4. OHIP-21

    Evaluate oral health-related quality of life using OHIP-21 questionnaire from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up.

    Time frame: At pre-treatment and after 10 days, 6-months and 12-months of zygomatic implant placement

  5. Keratinized mucosa status

    Keratinized mucosa status will be evaluated per zygomatic implant, without the prosthesis in place, and using the following score: 0 =No keratinized mucosa around the implant 1. =Mucosa surrounding the implant is partially keratinized 2. = The entire mucosa surrounding the implant is keratinized

    Time frame: At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement

  6. Modified Bleeding Index (mBI)

    The mBI will be evaluated at zygomatic implant level, without the prosthesis in place, using the following score system: 0=No bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the gingival margin adjacent to the implant 1. Isolated bleeding spots visible. 2. Blood forms a confluent red line on the margin. 3. Heavy or profuse bleeding.

    Time frame: At 6- and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement

  7. Biological

    Biological complications will be recorded

    Time frame: From implant placement until12-months after implant placement

  8. Adverse Events

    All adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), device deficiencies (DDs), and unanticipated serious adverse device effects (USADEs) will be recorded from implant placement to the 12-month follow-up.

    Time frame: From implant placement until 12-months after implant placement

  9. Implant survival rate

    Evaluate implant survival rate from time of placement to 12-months follow-up

    Time frame: From time of placement to 12-months follow-up

  10. Abutment survival rate

    Evaluate abutment survival rate from implant placement to 12-months follow-up

    Time frame: From implant placement to 12-months follow-up

  11. Clinician satisfaction - handling of device

    To evaluate clinician's satisfaction with handling of the device using a VAS scale (from 0-not satisfied to 100-fully satisfied)

    Time frame: After 10-days of zygomatic implant placement

  12. Clinician satisfaction - function and esthetic

    To evaluate clinician's satisfaction with function and esthetics (using VAS scale 0-not satisfied and 100-fully satisfied)

    Time frame: At 6-months and 12-months follow-up of zygomatic implant placement

  13. Technical complications

    All technical complications will be recorded

    Time frame: From zygomatic implant placement until 12.months follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Prosthetic survival

    To evaluate prosthetic survival rate

    Time frame: From placement until 12-months follow-up

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Universitiy of Verona, Unit of Stomatology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery
    Verona, 37134, Italy
    • Antonio D Agostino, Prof · Contact · claudia.diasazevedof@envistaco.com · +41795407703
    • Antonio D Agostino, Prof · Principal investigator
    • Lorenzo Trevisiol, Prof · Principal investigator
  • Hirslanden Medical Center
    Aarau, 5000, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yalcin M, Can S, Akbas M, Dergin G, Garip H, Aydil BA, Varol A. Retrospective Analysis of Zygomatic Implants for Maxillary Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):750-756. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8196. PubMed 32724927 ↗
  • Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Henry PJ, Andreasson L, Branemark PI, Chiapasco M, Gynther G, Finne K, Higuchi KW, Isaksson S, Kahnberg KE, Malevez C, Neukam FW, Sevetz E, Urgell JP, Widmark G, Bolind P. A clinical evaluation of the Zygoma fixture: one year of follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9 Suppl 2):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.030. PubMed 15332178 ↗
  • Davo R, Bankauskas S, Laurincikas R, Kocyigit ID, Mate Sanchez de Val JE. Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants-Retrospective Multicenter Study. J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 9;9(2):480. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020480. PubMed 32050501 ↗
  • Borgonovo A, Grandi T, Vassallo S, Signorini L. Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results From a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 13. PubMed 33160924 ↗
  • Aparicio C, Polido WD, Chow J, Davo R, Al-Nawas B. Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study. Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Apr 1;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00412-8. PubMed 35359196 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared. As per data protection regulation in EU participant's identity should be kept confidential. As per informed consent and GDPR consent, participant is informed that their data will be securely stored in EDC system in EU and analyzed in Switzerland by the sponsor. As per EU and Switzerland data protection regulations, access to participant's data should only be given for the sponsor, regulatory authorities and ethic committee members. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and/or conference presentations. Summary results will be shared (e.g. via publication or posting results in ClinicalTrials.gov)

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07258940
Lead sponsor
Nobel Biocare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Claudia D Fagundes
Contact
claudia.diasazevedof@envistaco.com
+41795407703
Ewa Bednarek
study director · Nobel Biocare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion