CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07257341NORVIBASUpdated Jan 9, 2026

Pilot Study of Normative Range of Field of Binocular Single Vision in Adults in Singapore

An observational study in Binocular Visual Function, sponsored by Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-09.

Sponsored by Tan Tock Seng Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Ages
21 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The assessment and monitoring of the field of binocular single vision remains a crucial aspect of ophthalmological care, yet current clinical practice relies on normative standards established by Feibel \& Roper-Hall in 1974 that present significant limitations for contemporary application. The original study, conducted with a demographically homogeneous Caucasian population in St Louis using only "several" normal individuals, raises concerns regarding its applicability to Asian populations, particularly in Singapore, where ethnic and genetic factors may influence ocular characteristics. The limited sample size significantly increases the likelihood of Type II errors, whilst the temporal gap of over five decades introduces additional concerns regarding population changes, environmental factors, and advances in measurement techniques that have not been incorporated into current normative data. Given these substantial limitations in demographic representation, statistical power, and temporal relevance, there exists a pressing need to establish population-specific normative data for the field of binocular single vision in Singapore's adult population, which would provide more clinically relevant reference values and potentially improve diagnostic accuracy for ocular conditions in the local context.

Read the detailed description

The assessment and monitoring of the field of binocular single vision is a crucial aspect of ophthalmological care, particularly in the management of oculoplastics and strabismus. Currently, clinicians worldwide, including those in Singapore, rely on the normal boundary of the field of binocular single vision established by Doctor Robert M. Feibel \& Gill Roper-Hall in 1974 as the gold-standard parameter for clinical assessment. However, this long-standing standard raises several significant concerns regarding its applicability to our current population.

The original study by Feibel \& Roper-Hall was conducted in St Louis, Missouri, United States of America, with participants who were likely of Caucasian descent. This demographic composition presents a potential limitation when applying these standards to Asian populations, particularly in Singapore, where ethnic and genetic factors may influence ocular characteristics. Furthermore, the study's methodology involved only "several" normal individuals, suggesting a sample size of more than two but fewer than ten participants. A sample size of this limited scope significantly increases the likelihood of Type II errors, potentially compromising the statistical power and reliability of the established normative values.

The temporal gap of over five decades since the original study adds another layer of concern. Population characteristics, environmental factors, and lifestyle patterns have undergone substantial changes during this period, potentially affecting ocular health parameters. Additionally, advances in measurement techniques and an understanding of ocular physiology suggest the need for updated normative data that reflect current population characteristics and incorporate modern assessment methodologies.

Given these limitations, there is a pressing need to establish population-specific normative data for the field of binocular single vision in Singapore's adult population. This would not only provide more relevant reference values for clinical assessment but also potentially improve the accuracy of diagnosis and monitoring of various ocular conditions in our local context.

02

Conditions studied

  • Binocular Visual Function

Keywords

  • Binocular field of vision
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tan Tock Seng Hospital is the lead sponsor of 103 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy Individuals

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 21 to 59 years old
  • Gender: Males or females
  • Ethnicity: Asian descent.
  • Language comprehension: Able to understand verbal spoken instructions in:

    • British/American English
    • Mandarin Chinese
    • Bahasa Melayu
  • Protocol compliance: Ability to comply with the study protocol, as determined by the investigator's judgment
  • Consent capacity: Must be able to understand and provide informed consent, with signed informed consent form required before any study assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Communication barrier: Unable to understand verbal spoken instructions

  • Medical history:

    • Any facial trauma
    • Any ocular trauma
    • Any head trauma
    • Any history of ocular disease
    • Any history of ocular surgery
    • Systemic condition(s)
  • Near visual acuity:

    o Right eye \& Left eye monocularly, binocularly unaided near vision: worse than N6 at 40cm from participant's nose

  • Ocular alignment:

    o Prism cover test at near (30cm) of equal or greater than 10 prism diopters at these positions of gaze:

    • Primary gaze
    • Right gaze
    • Left gaze
    • Up gaze
    • Down gaze
  • Extraocular movement:

    o Extraocular movement of over-action or under-action of equal or greater than 0.5 in any of the nine cardinal positions of gaze

  • Confrontational Visual field:

    o Abnormal monocular visual field on confrontational visual field test

  • Hess chart test o Abnormal or asymmetry in pattern of extraocular muscle action in Hess chart test
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testField of Binocular Single Vision

    The intervention involves a single field of binocular single vision assessment using the Takagi MT-325UD Projection Perimeter. Participants undergo binocular testing where they fixate and follow a single round light stimulus as it moves throughout the perimeter bowl. When participants perceive two distinct light stimuli (indicating loss of binocular single vision), they press a buzzer. The orthoptist records these responses and plots the boundaries on a standardised recording sheet to map the participant's field of binocular single vision. This intervention addresses significant limitations of the current gold standard established by Feibel \& Roper-Hall (1974). The original study was conducted with "several" normal individuals (likely fewer than 10 participants) of Caucasian descent in St Louis, Missouri, creating potential issues with statistical power and population applicability. Our study uses a larger, more robust sample size of 32 participants specifically from Singapore's Asian

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Field of Binocular Single Vision in Asian population

    Establish comprehensive normative range of field of binocular single vision (BSV) specifically for healthy adults in Singapore's population aged 21-59, creating locally relevant reference standards that reflect ethnic, genetic, and contemporary population. BSV is the ability to use both eyes simultaneously and coordinate the slightly different images from each eye into a single, unified, three-dimensional mental percept. The "field of binocular single vision" is the specific area within the overall visual field where this fusion and single vision can be maintained. To measure the field of BSV using Goldmann perimetry, a moving light stimulus is presented while the patient uses both eyes. The test maps the area where the patient can maintain fusion (single vision). The boundary where fusion breaks (and diplopia starts) is plotted across different directions to define the BSV field.

    Time frame: up to 20 minutes during 1 study visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of current field of binocular single vision gold standard between Caucasian population vs Asian population

    Conduct rigorous statistical comparison between newly established Singapore normative values and existing Feibel \& Roper-Hall (1974) standards to quantify differences and determine clinical significance. Current benchmarks are based on a 1974 U.S. study by Feibel \& Roper-Hall that involved fewer than ten Caucasian subjects and no Asian representation. Consequently, clinicians may over- or under-diagnose ocular deviation and fusion deficits in Asian patients. The study validates a modern methodology using the Takagi MT-325UD Projection Perimeter to map BSV fields under standardized conditions.

    Time frame: Up to 20 minutes during 1 study visit.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore 308433, Singapore
    • Zheng Kuang Noel Soh, BSc · Contact · zheng.kuang.soh@nhghealth.com.sg · +65 6357 3693
    • Daniel Chin, MBBS · Principal investigator
    • Yan Tong Koh, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Sebastian Yue, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Jackson Chng, BSc · Sub investigator
    • Azizah Binte Hajamohideen, BSc · Sub investigator
    • Zheng Kuang Noel Soh, BSc · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Feibel RM, Roper-Hall G. Evaluation of the field of binocular single vision in incomitant strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Nov;78(5):800-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90303-1. No abstract available. PubMed 4425006 ↗
  • Kakizaki H, Umezawa N, Takahashi Y, Selva D. Binocular single vision field. Ophthalmology. 2009 Feb;116(2):364. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.046. No abstract available. PubMed 19187829 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 15, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data cannot be shared due to local governing laws and institutional regulations.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07257341
Lead sponsor
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Responsible party
Daniel Chin Yuxiang (Associate Consultant, Tan Tock Seng Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2025
Start date
Oct 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 14, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2026

Study contacts

Zheng Kuang Noel Soh, BSc
Contact
zheng.kuang.soh@nhghealth.com.sg
+65 6357 3693
Daniel Chin, MBBS
principal investigator · Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Sebastian Yue, MSc
study director · Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion