ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07239791NOISYXETINEUpdated Nov 20, 2025

Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics: Evaluation of the Effect of a Low-dose Selective Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor (NOISYXETINE)

An interventional study of Atomoxetine and Placebo in Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics and No Disease or Condition is Being Studied, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier St Anne. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 39 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-20.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier St Anne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 39 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Administration of low-dose selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (sNRI) (e.g. atomoxetine) to healthy subjects is a validated model of increasing cortical noradrenaline levels which, combined with computational modelling of behaviour, allows fine-grained analysis of the impact on learning processes of noradrenaline's fluctuations in the human cortex.

The study goal is to characterize the modifications of certain cognitive processes and associated brain circuits under low-dose sNRI using validated computational learning models. The study will be interested in how subjects will modify their learning under the effect of the drug across two separate investigations; one utilizing in a stable evidence accumulation task and one utilising a changing evidence accumulation task. This approach will help to better understand the link between noradrenaline and accumulation of evidence in healthy subjects, and indirectly in some neuropsychiatric pathologies.

The study is a single centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving evaluable healthy adults separated in 2 cohorts: A for participants having the stable task and B for those having the changing one. Participants will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment sequences:

  • Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo (Subgroups A1 or B1);
  • Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg (Subgroups A2 or B2).
Read the detailed description

Hundred and sixty healthy volunteers will be enrolled (80 / task) in 24 months. The maximum duration of participation for each subject is 51 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics
  • No Disease or Condition is Being Studied

Keywords

  • noradrenaline
  • learning dynamics
  • atomoxetine
  • healthy subject
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier St Anne is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Right-handed, assessed by the Edinburgh scale;
  • Written signed ;
  • Subject covered by a social security regimen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman;
  • First-degree family history of axis I disorder (), excepted unipolar mood and anxiety disorders with OCD;
  • Personal history of axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR) in the 6 months preceding the study entry;
  • Dependence on a psychoactive substance in the 12 months preceding the study entry, excluding nicotine, any behavioural disorder incompatible with a 2-hour electroencephalographic recording;
  • Neuro/psychotropic treatment ongoing or stopped less than 1 month ago;
  • Personal history of neurological pathology (e.g.: congenital malformation, benign or malignant tumour, degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), epilepsy, inflammatory or infectious disease of the CNS, etc.);
  • Personal history of chronic disease of infectious, neoplastic, vascular, dysimmune or inflammatory, metabolic or endocrine, degenerative or genetic aetiology. In particular, angle-closure glaucoma, pheochromocytoma, known high blood pressure or measured blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg at baseline, congenital heart disease, known ischemic heart disease, known heart failure, supraventricular or ventricular heart rhythm disorder, nephropathy, known liver disease and any pathology likely to be aggravated by an increase in blood pressure;
  • Any medical treatment in the month preceding the study entry, apart from effective treatment;
  • Subject deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision;
  • Person subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express consent;
  • Known intolerance to atomoxetine;
  • Need to wear glasses and/or lenses to obtain normal vision;
  • Subject in an exclusion period or enrolled in an interventional study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Sequence 1: Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo

    The participants will receive one cap of atomoxetine 40 mg at V1 and placebo at V2

    Drug: Atomoxetine · Drug: Placebo

  • Other
    Sequence 2: Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg

    The participants will receive one cap of placebo at V1 and atomoxetine 40 mg at V2

    Drug: Atomoxetine · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • One single capsule of atomoxetine 40 mg given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated. Placebo of atomoxetine will be administered at the other visit for the participant (according to the sequence randomly allocated)

  • DrugPlacebo

    One single capsule of placebo given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Apparent Learning rate

    Paired difference in the apparent learning rates (in both environmental contexts: stable task and changing task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions. Apparent learning rate will be calculate with the following formula: αt=(vt- vt-(1) )/(xt- vt-1) according to Foucault and Meyniel (Foucault C, Meyniel F (2024) Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities. Open Mind : Discov Cogn Sci 8:615-638) The learning rate measures the amount of update of the learned value (from vt-(1 to vt) induced by the observation xt in proportion to its deviation from the previously learned value.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of adverse events

    Side effects (treatment related adverse events) in all groups between study drug administration at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7) including vital signs worsening and ECG findings

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  2. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 2 (Day 7)

    Computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 1 and 2: paired difference in latent behavioral parameters of the computational models that characterize the learning process (in a stable accumulation task and in a dynamic accumulation task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  3. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire at Visit 2

    The scores of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire (Spielberger et al., 1983) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression and anxiety. The STAI comprises 2 questionnaires of 20 items with the following ranges: * STAI-YA (state anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety * STAI-YB (Trait anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  4. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire at Visit 2

    The scores of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire (Beck et al., 1961) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression. The BDI comprises 21 items with the following ranges: 0-63 with 0 equivalent to no depression and 63 the worst possible depression.

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  5. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on anxiety at Visit 2

    The scores of the VAS-anxiety will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of anxiety. The VAS ranges from 0 (no anxiety) to 100 mm (worst possible anxiety).

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  6. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on sadness at Visit 2

    The scores of the VAS-sadness will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of sadness. The VAS ranges from 0 (no sadness) to 100 mm (worst possible sadness).

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

  7. Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on fatigue at Visit 2

    The scores of the VAS-fatigue will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of fatigue. The VAS ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 100 mm (maximum imaginable fatigue).

    Time frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institut de Neuromodulation
    Paris, 75014, France
    Recruiting
    • Cécile BULTEZ, MSc · Contactcecile.bultez@ghu-paris.fr · +33 1 45 80 52 70 19
    • Philippe Domenech, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Analytic code

Data sharing details ↗ · www.osf.io

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 29, 2025
First posted
Nov 20, 2025
StartActual
Nov 18, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Nov 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07239791
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2025
Start date
Nov 18, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 20, 2025

Study contacts

Florent Meyniel, MD, PhD
Contact
florent.meyniel@ghu-paris.fr
+33 1 45 65 63 90

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Atomoxetine

Start the discussion