CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07238023Updated Sep 11, 2026

Promoting Active Living Among People With Advanced Cancer

An interventional study of Acceptance- and mindfulness-based physical activity promotion in Metastatic Invasive Breast Cancer and Metastatic Invasive Gynecologic Cancer, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Individuals with metastatic cancer are living longer but often face persistent fatigue, functional decline, and psychological distress. Physical activity is generally safe for this population and may alleviate symptom burden. Yet, limited interventions are tailored to the unique and needs and preferences of this population. This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a mindfulness- and acceptance-based physical activity program designed to support mental, social, and spiritual well-being among people with metastatic breast or gynecologic cancer. A single group, pretest-posttest trial (N=36) will be conducted to inform scalable strategies to promote active living and enhance quality of life among people with advanced cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Invasive Breast Cancer
  • Metastatic Invasive Gynecologic Cancer

Keywords

  • aerobic physical activity
  • muscle strengthening physical activity
  • mindfulness
  • acceptance
  • telehealth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Having ever received a histologically confirmed diagnosis of stage 4 invasive breast or gynecologic carcinoma (eligible cancer types include epithelial ovarian carcinoma, endometrial/uterine carcinoma, and invasive cervical carcinoma; other rare gynecologic malignancies [e.g., vaginal, vulvar] may also be included if approved by the study team)

medical clearance from healthcare provider to participate in this study (which encourages unsupervised, low-intensity physical activity such as walking, stretching, and gentle muscle-strengthening exercises)

life expectancy of at least 6 months as per the participant's healthcare provider

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of or 0, 1, or 2

being willing and able to use a smartphone and web interface with or without assistance; if assistance is needed, it must be readily available

adequate visual and hearing acuity to use a smartphone and web interface as indicated by self-report

adequate motor capacity to use a smartphone and web interface as indicated by self-report

willingness to download and use study-specific app(s), the Fitbit mobile application (this requires use of a Google Gmail account), and other mobile applications for study purposes as needed

completed baseline survey

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

contraindications to physical activity (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac disease noted by the patient's treating healthcare provider)

presence of bone metastases deemed unstable and/or high risk by the treating healthcare provider

untreated brain metastases

history of dementia or other major neurocognitive disorder

received a diagnosis of a major psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, or alcoholism that could affect the ability to understand and/or complete the study

currently hospitalized

enrolled in hospice

inability to speak, read, and write in English at the 7th grade level

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Intervention

    Provision of standard self-regulatory behavior change techniques, plus acceptance and mindfulness-based physical activity promotion

    Behavioral: Acceptance- and mindfulness-based physical activity promotion

Interventions

  • BehavioralAcceptance- and mindfulness-based physical activity promotion

    This intervention will be delivered over the course of up to 8-12 weeks. It will include: 1. the provision of a wearable physical activity tracker 2. empirically supported behavior change techniques for promoting physical activity 3. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-informed didactic content centered on promoting physical activity 4. a social component with game design elements reflecting acceptance and mindfulness practices (i.e., the ability to share responses to "Weekly Challenges" and view and comment on others' entries).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Semi-structured Interviews

    Semi-structured interviews will be used to assess participants' overall experience and their perceptions of the usability, usefulness, and enjoyability of the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 9

  2. Perceived ease of use

    Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions easy to use. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Easy" (scored as 1) to "Very Easy" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater ease of use.

    Time frame: Week 9

  3. Perceived Usefulness

    Face valid questions will be used to determine whether participants found the interventions useful. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Useful" (scored as 1) to "Very Useful" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater perceived usefulness.

    Time frame: Week 9

  4. Enjoyability - Face Valid Questions

    Face valid questions will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The face valid questions consists of five 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All Enjoyable" (scored as 1) to "Very Enjoyable" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.

    Time frame: Week 9

  5. Enjoyability - Interest/Enjoyment Subscale

    The interest/enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMIe) will be used to assess the enjoyability of the interventions in this study. The IMIe sub-scale consists of seven 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All True" (scored as 1) to "Very True" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.

    Time frame: Week 9

  6. Feasibility of the Program - Study Retention

    We will assess program feasibility via measurements of study retention. We will compute what percentage of enrolled participant complete post-intervention data collection procedures.

    Time frame: Week 9

  7. Feasibility of the Program - Adherence

    We will assess program feasibility via measurements of intervention adherence. We will compute what percentage of participants engage with at least 75% of the intervention modules.

    Time frame: Week 9

  8. Feasibility of Collecting Biological Samples

    We will assess the feasibility of assessing gene expression in the present context by assessing what percentage of enrolled participants provide analyzable data in optional post-intervention blood draws.

    Time frame: Week 9

Other outcomes

  1. Physical Activity

    A modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire will be used to assess participants' physical activity patterns. This self-report measure assesses the number of minutes of strenuous-, moderate-, and light-intensity exercise in a typical week. An additional item will be included that assesses the number of bouts of muscle-strengthening exercise in a typical week. We will also gather data provided by consumer-grade, wearable physical activity trackers (Fitbit Charge series or similar).

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  2. Feelings of Vitality

    The Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) will be used to will be used to assess participants' feelings of vitality. The SVS consists of seven 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not At All True" (scored as 1) to "Very True" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater enjoyability.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  3. Meaning Salience

    The Meaning Awareness Scale (MAS) will be used to assess meaning salience. The MAS consists of six 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Very Rarely" (scored as 1) to "Very Often" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater meaning salience.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  4. Psychological Flexibility

    The Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI) will be used to assess psychological flexibility. The PPFI consists of sixteen 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Strongly Disagree" (scored as 1) to "Strongly Agree" (scored as 7). Higher scores reflect greater psychological flexibility.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  5. Physical Activity Motivation

    The Behavioral Regulation for Exercise Questionnaire-4 (BREQ-4) will be used to assess physical activity motivation. The BREQ-4 consists of twenty-eight 5-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Not True For Me" (scored as 0) to "Very True For Me" (scored as 4). It is best practice to score each of the seven subscales separately (i.e., obtain separate scores for amotivation, external regulation, introjected avoidance regulation, introjected approach regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic regulation). For each subscale, higher scores reflect greater usage of that type of regulation.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  6. Physical Activity Acceptance

    The Physical Activity Acceptance Questionnaire (PAAQ) will be used to assess physical activity acceptance. The PAAQ consists of ten 7-point Likert-type items. Responses range from "Never True" (scored as 1) to "Always True" (scored as 7). It is best practice to score each of the two subscales separately (i.e., obtain separate scores for cognitive acceptance and behavioral commitment). For each subscale, higher scores reflect greater acceptance/commitment.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  7. Health-Related Quality of Life - Physical Function

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The physical function subscale has 4 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Unable To Do" (scored as 1) to "Without Any Difficulty" (scored as 5). Higher scores for physical function are favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  8. Health-Related Quality of Life - Anxiety

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The anxiety subscale has 4 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Never" (scored as 1) to "Always" (scored as 5). Higher scores for anxiety are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  9. Health-Related Quality of Life - Depressive Symptoms

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The depressive symptoms subscale has 4 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Never" (scored as 1) to "Always" (scored as 5). Higher scores for depressive symptoms are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  10. Health-Related Quality of Life - Fatigue

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The fatigue subscale has 4 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Not At All" (scored as 1) to "Very Much" (scored as 5). Higher scores for fatigue are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  11. Health-Related Quality of Life - Sleep Disturbance

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The sleep disturbance subscale has 4 items with 5 point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Not At All" (scored as 1) to "Very Much" (scored as 5). Higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  12. Health-Related Quality of Life - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The ability to participate in social roles and activities subscale has 4 items with 5 point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Not At All" (scored as 1) to "Very Much" (scored as 5). Higher scores for ability to participate in social roles and activities are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  13. Health-Related Quality of Life - Pain Interference

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The pain interference subscale has 4 items with 5 point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Not At All" (scored as 1) to "Very Much" (scored as 5). Higher scores for pain interference are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  14. Health-Related Quality of Life - Cognition

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The cognition subscale has 2 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (e.g., ranging from "Not At All" (scored as 1) to "Very Much" (scored as 5). Higher scores for cognition are favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

  15. Health-Related Quality of Life - Pain Intensity

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 consists of thirty-one items spanning nine subscales (i.e., physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity). The pain intensity subscale has 1 item with responses ranging from "No Pain" (scored as 0) to "Worst Pain Imaginable" (scored as 10). Higher scores for pain intensity are not favorable.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 9

07

Study locations

1 site
  • TSET Health Promotion Research Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — We are undecided about sharing individual participant data at this time. This study involves a sensitive population and may result in a relatively small sample size, which increases the risk of participant re-identification even after de-identification procedures. We will evaluate data sharing feasibility after study completion, taking into account participant privacy protections, ethical considerations, and institutional policies.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07238023
Lead sponsor
University of Oklahoma
Collaborators
TSET Health Promotion Research Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2025
Start date
Feb 27, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Michael C Robertson, MPH, PhD
principal investigator · University of Oklahoma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion