CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07221097Updated Aug 27, 2026

Prospective Clinical Evaluation of the BioFire Emerging Coronavirus Panel for the Detection of COVID-19 and Other Coronaviruses

An observational study in Coronavirus, Respiratory Infection and COVID, sponsored by BioFire Defense LLC. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by BioFire Defense LLC · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,091
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) has contracted BioFire Defense (BFDf) to develop the BioFire Emerging Coronavirus (ECoV) Panel, a nucleic acid test capable of detecting coronaviruses from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) in transport medium.

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the assays comprising the BioFire ECoV Panel. It is hypothesized that the BioFire ECoV Panel assays will be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of the coronaviruses included on the panel.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this observational, non-interventional study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the assays comprising the BioFire ECoV Panel when used to test NPS obtained from individuals with signs and/or symptoms of respiratory infection. Multiple geographically distinct clinical sites in the U.S. will participate in testing. Enrollment will consist of residual, coded NPS specimens leftover from standard of care testing for a suspected respiratory infection as determined by a health care provider. Concordance between the BioFire ECoV Panel assays and comparator methods will be measured using positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronavirus
  • Respiratory Infection
  • COVID

Keywords

  • in vitro diagnostic
  • pandemic preparedness
  • medical device
  • molecular diagnostic
  • coronavirus
03

In context

Coronavirus Infections

929 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronavirus Infections; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,091 is above the median of 300 across 334 observational studies indexed under Coronavirus Infections.

Browse Coronavirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

BioFire Defense LLC is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

patients suspected of a respiratory infection by their healthcare provider

Inclusion criteria

  • Specimen is residual NPS in transport medium (VTM or UTM) left over from standard of care testing under clinician order for respiratory pathogen analysis.
  • Specimen has been held at room temperature for less than or equal to 4 hours or 4°C for less than or equal to 72 hours before enrollment.
  • At least 1.7 mL of specimen is remaining after standard of care testing and available for use in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specimen is unable to be tested within the defined storage parameters
  • Insufficient specimen volume for testing
  • Transport medium type is unknown
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,091 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Suspected respiratory infection

    NPS specimens leftover from SOC testing for a suspected respiratory infection as determined by a health care provider

    Device: Investigational IVD for coronaviruses

Interventions

  • DeviceInvestigational IVD for coronaviruses

    Device testing on prospectively collected specimens leftover from standard of care for IVD validation only; results will not influence patient care/management.

    Also known as: BIOFIRE ECoV Panel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Device Performance

    Positive Percent Agreement and Negative Percent Agreement for Panel Targets

    Time frame: Through study completion; September 2025-August 2026

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • George Washington University
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30032, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1042, United States
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    Galveston, Texas 77550, United States
08

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 7, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07221097
Lead sponsor
BioFire Defense LLC
Collaborators
Children's Hospital Los Angeles, George Washington University, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Tampa General Hospital, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Emory University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2025
Start date
Sep 29, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026
Completion
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Study contacts

Brittany C Collins, PhD
principal investigator · BioFire Defense LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion