CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07214714Updated Oct 9, 2025

Hemodynamic and Cardiac Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl by Intravenous Infusion as Adjuncts to General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgeries.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fentanyl (IV) and Dexmedetomidine in Abdominal Cancer Surgeries, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-09.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

________________________________________

Background :

Major abdominal cancer surgery is among the most invasive procedures, often associated with extensive tissue damage, severe postoperative pain, and delayed recovery. Inadequate pain management can result in adverse physiological responses such as tachycardia, hypertension, prolonged immobility, and extended hospital stay. Moreover, poorly controlled pain may impair immune function and contribute to neuroendocrine, metabolic, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary complications. Therefore, effective analgesia is essential to improve patient outcomes and recovery.

Multimodal analgesia has emerged as the gold standard for managing postoperative pain in major abdominal surgery. It integrates regional techniques (such as epidural or intrathecal analgesia), peripheral nerve blocks (e.g., transversus abdominis plane block), systemic opioids, and non-opioid agents including NSAIDs and acetaminophen. This approach minimizes surgical stress, maintains hemodynamic stability, and facilitates early ambulation and discharge.

Opioids, particularly fentanyl, are widely used as intrathecal adjuvants due to their rapid onset and favorable analgesic profile. However, selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine are gaining attention for their sedative, analgesic, sympatholytic, and hemodynamic-stabilizing effects. Administered intrathecally, epidurally, or intravenously, they can enhance analgesia while reducing anesthetic requirements without causing profound sedation.

Conventional monitoring with heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure may overlook subtle variations in cardiac output. Electrical cardiometry (ICON®) provides continuous, non-invasive, beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac parameters and has been validated across different patient groups. Accordingly, the present study aims to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to general anesthesia, focusing on their effects on hemodynamics and cardiac function in major abdominal cancer surgery using electrical cardiometry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Cancer Surgeries
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA physical status I- III, NYHA class I- II
  • Patients subjected to elective major abdominal cancer surgeries.
  • The enrolled age will be ≥ 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unfit for surgery
  • Patient refusal
  • Body mass index>40 kg/m2
  • ASA physical status IV-V, NYHA class III-IV.
  • Chronic opioid consumption
  • Contraindications to neuraxial block (coagulopathy, infection, or hematological disorders).
  • Pregnant women
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the used drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group D

    Patients will receive Dexmedetomidineloading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Active comparator
    Group F

    Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.

    Drug: Fentanyl (IV)

Interventions

  • DrugFentanyl (IV)

    Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.

  • DrugDexmedetomidine

    Patients will receive Dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. cardiac output (CO)

    cardiac output (CO) measured using the non-invasive ICON® monitor

    Time frame: 24 hour postoperative

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07214714
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Nariman Khaled Abd Elmontalb Hamed (residant doctor at Assiut university hospital, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion