An interventional study of Snow-plow restorative technique and Resin coating restorative technique in Postoperative Tooth Sensitivity Following Class II Composite Restorations, sponsored by University of Jordan. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Jordan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-08.
Sponsored by University of Jordan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is designed to compare two modern techniques used to restore decayed back teeth with tooth-colored filling materials. Some patients experience temporary discomfort or sensitivity after these types of dental treatments. The purpose of this study is to learn whether one technique may help reduce this short-term sensitivity compared to the other.
Adults who need fillings on both sides of their mouth are invited to participate. Each patient will receive one filling using each technique, placed in different teeth during the same appointment. The procedures will be performed using standard clinical methods and materials.
After treatment, participants will be contacted by telephone to report any discomfort at several time points during the first week. The interviewer will not know which technique was used for each tooth to ensure unbiased reporting. This information will help dentists better understand how these techniques affect patients' comfort in the days following treatment.
Postoperative tooth sensitivity is a common but often transient symptom following the placement of direct posterior resin composite restorations. Patients frequently report mild to moderate discomfort, particularly during the first few days after treatment, which can influence their perception of treatment success and overall satisfaction. While advances in adhesive dentistry and restorative materials have greatly improved clinical outcomes, postoperative sensitivity remains a relevant clinical concern.
This clinical trial is designed to compare two contemporary restorative techniques-the snow-plow technique and the resin coating technique following immediate dentin sealing-in terms of postoperative patient-reported pain during the first postoperative week. Both techniques aim to enhance marginal adaptation and reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses at the adhesive interface, thereby potentially minimizing pulpal irritation and postoperative discomfort.
Participants in this study are adult patients requiring Class II resin composite restorations on two comparable posterior teeth, typically located on opposite sides of the dental arch. Each participant will receive two restorations, one using the snow-plow technique and the other using the resin coating technique, in a split-mouth design. This approach allows each participant to serve as their own control, minimizing inter-patient variability and enabling a more reliable comparison between the two restorative strategies.
All procedures are performed under rubber dam isolation using standardized adhesive and restorative protocols to ensure clinical consistency. The snow-plow technique involves placing an uncured flowable bulk-fill resin on the cavity floor, immediately followed by the placement of a packable composite increment. Both materials are then light-cured simultaneously. This technique is intended to improve adaptation of the restorative material to cavity walls, displace voids, and reduce microleakage.
In the resin coating technique, immediate dentin sealing is performed following cavity preparation. A thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin is then applied over the sealed dentin and light-cured before the placement of the final packable composite increment. This layer acts as a stress-absorbing liner, providing a flexible interface that may protect the pulp and reduce the transmission of shrinkage stresses during polymerization.
Operator calibration and adherence to standardized protocols are emphasized to ensure uniformity. All restorations are carried out by a single experienced clinician using the same materials, instruments, and curing devices to reduce variability related to operator technique.
Postoperative discomfort is assessed using a standardized visual analog scale (VAS) during structured telephone interviews conducted at baseline (before treatment), 24 hours, 72 hours, and one week postoperatively. Interviews are performed by an assessor who is blinded to the restorative technique used for each tooth to minimize reporting bias. Participants are specifically instructed to evaluate each treated tooth independently without making side-by-side comparisons.
This study does not involve any experimental drugs or non-standard clinical procedures. Both restorative techniques are widely accepted in routine clinical practice and use materials that are commercially available and approved for dental use. The primary objective is to evaluate the early postoperative pain experience associated with each technique, rather than to introduce a novel material or intervention.
The findings of this study will contribute to a better understanding of how restorative technique selection influences postoperative sensitivity, potentially informing evidence-based clinical decision-making in restorative dentistry. By comparing two established but mechanistically distinct approaches, this trial aims to provide clinically relevant information that may help dentists optimize patient comfort following posterior resin composite placement.
University of Jordan is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Class II posterior cavities were restored using the snow-plow technique. After adhesive application, a thin layer of uncured flowable bulk-fill resin was placed on the gingival floor. A packable bulk-fill composite was then immediately inserted, displacing the flowable resin, and both were light-cured simultaneously. The occlusal anatomy was completed with packable composite, followed by finishing and polishing. Rubber-dam isolation and selective enamel etching with a universal adhesive were applied in all cases.
Procedure: Snow-plow restorative technique
Class II posterior cavities were restored using the resin coating technique following immediate dentin sealing. After adhesive application, a thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin was applied and light-cured to create a stress-absorbing layer on the dentin surface. Packable bulk-fill composite was then used to restore the remaining cavity, followed by occlusal sculpting, finishing, and polishing. All procedures were performed under rubber-dam isolation with selective enamel etching and universal self-etch adhesive on dentin.
Procedure: Resin coating restorative technique
The snow-plow technique involves placing a thin layer of uncured flowable bulk-fill resin on the gingival floor of a Class II cavity, immediately followed by placement of a packable bulk-fill composite. Both materials are light-cured simultaneously, allowing the flowable resin to fill voids and improve marginal adaptation.
Also known as: Snowplow technique
The resin coating technique involves applying and light-curing a thin layer of flowable bulk-fill resin after adhesive application to create a stress-absorbing layer on dentin (resin coating), followed by restoration with packable bulk-fill composite. This approach aims to protect the dentin, enhance bond stability, and reduce postoperative sensitivity
Also known as: Resin coating, Immediate dentin sealing with flowable liner
Postoperative pain intensity after Class II composite restorations
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline (before treatment), 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week following restorative procedures. Each treated tooth will be evaluated individually using structured telephone interviews conducted by a blinded examiner. VAS scores will be recorded and analyzed to compare pain trajectories between the snow-plow and resin coating restorative techniques.
Time frame: Baseline, 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week after restorative treatment
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results will be shared, including demographic data, intervention assignment, and all primary and secondary outcome measures. Data will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request following publication of the study results, in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines. Supporting materials, such as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will also be provided.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Jordan