CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07201870Pilot Be-ReadyUpdated Oct 1, 2025

Digital Preparation for Bariatric Surgery: Feasability Pilot Trial

An interventional study of Acces to Precare online platform in Obesity, Bariatric Surgery Patients and Online Education, sponsored by Laval University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by Laval University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,050
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is in increasing demand due to the growing prevalence of severe obesity and the cumulating evidence of long-term benefits on weight loss, cardiometabolic and functional health outcomes, and quality of life for individuals living with severe obesity. The time spent on the waiting list for an MBS follow the same trend with an estimated waiting time of more than 18 months and rising. The lack of resources and multidisciplinary capabilities among MBS centers impacts the quality of care and outcomes, which greatly contributes to delayed surgery. In 2023, 31% of patients who had an initial appointment with the MBS nurse at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University(IUCPQ) did not proceed with the surgery due to fear, uncertainty, or timing issues. Additionally, 49% reported that their concerns (e.g., financial, home support) were not addressed before MBS. These data highlight the urgent need to implement strategies to optimize wait time and ensure that MBS preparation is tailored to patients' expectations. Telehealth has significantly impacted surgical preparation, including for MBS, by enhancing accessibility, reducing dropout rates, and maintaining clinical outcomes that are comparable to traditional in-person visits but it requires real-time multidisciplinary execution, limiting the applicability for MBS waiting list patients. An interesting complement to telehealth intervention is online education platforms which offer digital flexibility, a significant advantage over in-person session.

To date, most MBS online resources are fee-based or driven by commercial interests and lack of clinical evidence, which raises concerns about their efficacy and safety for users who are seeking reliable support during their MBS journey.

A free online education platform could optimize the time spent on the MBS waiting list by increasing patients' readiness for MBS, furnishing invaluable insights into the patient journey to MBS, and empowering individuals undergoing MBS. The IUCPQ is in the process of working on the care trajectory of patients with obesity. The Healthcare Direction and the Bariatric Surgery Clinic decided to use a platform called Precare. This platform offers personalized educational content as well as a calendar and appointment management system. It has been accredited by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services. The present research focuses on the pilot testing the implementation and effectiveness of the PreCare solution for patients awaiting bariatric surgery at the IUCPQ.

The objectives of the research proposal are: 1) To assess the usability and acceptability of the Precare platform using a mixed design methodology; 2) To evaluate the logistical feasibility of using the platform in a clinical setting; 3) To determine whether extensive self-questionnaire assessments may impact the use of the Precare platform; 4) To explore barriers and facilitators to enhance patient engagement and knowledge retention; and 5) To derive estimates variables related to gender, ethnicity, cultural background, learners and psychological profiles for future phases.

Our hypotheses are:

  1. The Precare platform will exhibit high usability and acceptability.
  2. Testing the Precare platform in real clinical settings is viable and will yield promising results for improving patient readiness for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.
02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Bariatric Surgery Patients
  • Online Education
  • eHealth Literacy
  • Online-Intervention
  • Usability Satisfaction
  • Implementation Strategies
  • Shared Decision Making

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • bariatric surgery
  • preparation
  • education platform
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,050 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 371 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be on the waiting list for metabolic and bariatric surgery at IUCPQ
  • not yet assessed by the local team and with an expected wait time of more than 6 months
  • understand French
  • Have an active email address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Be part of the same household as someone already involved in this research project
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,050 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Arm 1: Control arm

    Participants will follow the standard protocols of preparation for a bariatric surgery and remain on the waiting list without access to the educational platform (Precare). Participants will have to fulfill the participant's description module and the readiness assessment. After the 6-month assessment, the patient will be providing a full access to Precare and will follow the same assessment process as arm 3 (i.e., Precare usability module, and the secondary clinical assessment module).

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: active arm with a short assessment

    Participants randomized to the active arm with a short assessment (arm 2) will be provided with 6-month of full access to the educational platform Precare and will have to fulfill the participant's description module and the readiness assessment (same as arm 1), as well as the Precare usability module.

    Other: Acces to Precare online platform

  • Experimental
    Arm 3: active arm with a full assessment

    Participants randomized to the active arm with a full assessment (arm 3) will be provided with 6-month of full access to the educational platform Precare after having fulfilled a REDCap module, including the participant's description module, the readiness assessment, the Precare usability module, and the secondary clinical assessment module.

    Other: Acces to Precare online platform

Interventions

  • OtherAcces to Precare online platform

    Precare is an online educational platform for patients on the waiting list for bariatric surgery. Precare offers personalized educational content as well as a calendar and appointment management system. It has been accredited by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-perceived barriers to metabolic and bariatric surgery

    Short questionnaire to assess the barriers to the decision for bariatric surgery perceived by patients based on Luck-Sikorski C, Jung F, Dietrich A, Stroh C, Riedel-Heller SG. Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany. Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):3928-3936. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04082-1. PMID: 31301032.

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. eHeals Literacy Scale

    Survey to measure Participants' feelings about their use of the Internet as a tool for obtaining health-related information. We will use the validated french version of the eHeals scale, a 10-item questionnaire. Question's response is measured with a 5 point likert scale with response options either going from 'strongle disagree' to 'strogly agree', 'not at all; usefull' to 'very usefull' or ' Not at all important' to 'Very important'. Higher scores represent higher sefl-perceive eHeals literacy.

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. Index of Learning Styles

    To assess of the learner profile of the patient (44 items) Adapted from the Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire by Barbara A. Solomon \& Richard M. Felder University of North Carolina Raleigh, NC 27695

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA)

    32-item scale based on Prochaska and DiClemente's transtheoretical behaviour change model to assess the readiness of the patient to bariatric surgery. Each question is measured on a 5-point Likert scale with response options ranging from "strongly disagree"(1 point) to "strongly agree"(5 points). Questions are divided into four subscales of 8 items each: precontemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance. Each subscale score from 1 to 40. The readiness to bariatric surgery score is calculated by adding the scores from the Contemplation, Action and Maintenance subscales and subtracting from that sum the Precontemplation subscale score. The total score ranges from 1 to 160, with higher scores indicating better readiness.

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  5. Home-made survey

    To assess readiness of the patient to bariatric surgery. Questionnaire based on the current questionnaire sent to participants when they attempt psychiatric assessment for metabolic and bariatric surgery at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute - Laval University(IUCPQ)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  6. System Usability Scale score(SUS)

    To asses the usability of the platform Precare based. SUS is a 10-item validated questionnaire for assessing system usability, including software, websites, and applications. Each item is rated on a 5 points Likert scale ranging from 'Strongly disagree'(1) to 'strongly agree'(5). A higher score represent a higher usability of the platform. (only for arm 2 and arm 3)

    Time frame: at 3 and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mental Health Continuum Short Form

    14-item questionnaire to assess overall psychopathology. Each question is measured on a 6-point Likert scale with response options ranging from "Never"(0 point) to "Everyday"(5 points). Total score ranges from 0 to 70, with a higher score representing better mental well-being. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  2. Motivation to attempt metabolic and bariatric surgery

    Survey on factors influencing patients' mottivation to undergo bariatric surgery

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. Physical and psychological comorbidities

    Number of current associated comorbidities to patient

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. Body Mass Index in kg.m-2

    Anthropometric markers: weight and height will be combined to report the body mass index (BMI) in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: At baseline

  5. Age of first weight gain

    Age of participants when they first gained weight

    Time frame: At baseline

  6. Weight Loss Attempts

    Description of past weight loss attempts as reported by participant

    Time frame: At Baseline

  7. Adherence to weight loss attempts

    Duration of adherence to the various approaches of weight loss tried by participants

    Time frame: At baseline

  8. Minimal weight

    Minimum weight reached by the participant since adulthood

    Time frame: At baseline

  9. Maximum weight

    Maximum weight reached by the participant since adulthood

    Time frame: At baseline

  10. Binge Eating Scale score

    To assess the presence of certain binge eating behaviors that may be indicative of an eating disorder. The higher the score, the more binge eating behaviors is observed. The minimum score is 0 while the maximum score is 46. The final result allows to say if the person has an absent (less than 17), moderate (between 18 and 26) or severe (more than 27) binging level. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  11. modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0)

    The mYFAS 2.0 was designed to assess food addiction using a shorter version than the YFAS 2.0.It assesses the symptoms of food addiction and the resulting distress and impaired functioning. The higher the level of symptoms, the more severe the food addiction. Impaired functioning and distress are scored from 0 to 2. Symptoms are scored from 0 to 11. If the functioning and distress score is 1 and above, the food addiction may be mild (2-3 symptoms), moderate (4-5 symptoms), or severe (6+ symptoms). (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  12. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    This self-administered questionnaire assesses depressive symptoms using seven items (ÉHAD-D) and anxiety symptoms using another seven items (ÉHAD-A), for a total of 14 items. Each question is scored from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate higher level of anxiety and depression. A total score between 0 and 7 reflects a normal level of anxiety and depression, a score of 8 to 10 indicates a borderline level and a score of 11 and above indicates a high level of anxiety and depression. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  13. Canadian Food Intake Screener

    To assess the participant's degree of adherence to the Canada's food guide (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  14. Canadian Eating Practices Screener

    To assess the participant's degree of adherence to the Canada's food guide (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  15. Malnutrition Screening Tool

    To assess participant's risk of malnutrition scored from 0 to 7. A score of 2 or more means the participant is at risk for malnutrition. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  16. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Questionnaire from the World Health Organization to assess physical activity participation of the patient (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  17. Multidimensional Body Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales

    34-item questionnaire to assess aspects of body image. Questions are divided into five subscales: Appearance Evaluation, Appearance Orientation, Body Area Satisfaction, Overweight Preoccupation and Self-classified Weight. Each question is measured with 5-point Likert scales. The mean of each subscale is calculated. Higher scores generally indicate more positive body image and appearance satisfaction (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  18. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

    12-Item questionnaire to assess the social support of patients. Each question is measured on a 7-point Likert scale with response options ranging from " very strongly disagree"(1 point) to "very strongly agree"(7 points). Questions are divided into three subscales of four items each: Significant others, Friends and Family. Each subscale score ranges from 4 to 28. A higher score indicates a higher perceived support. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  19. World Health Organization Quality of Life- BREF

    26-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life of the patient. Each question is measured on 5-point Likert scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score associated to better quality of life. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: Art baseline, 3 mopnths and 6 months

  20. Patient Empowerment Strategies Questionnaire

    15-item questionnaire to assess the patient empowerment. Each question is measured on a 4-point Likert scale with response options ranging from "totally agree"(4 point) to "totally disagree"(1 points). Score ranges from 15 to 54. Higher scores indicate greater patient empowerment. (Only for arm 3)

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  21. Recruitment rate

    Assessed by calculating the ratio of participants recruited for the current study / number of participants invited to participate in the present study.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  22. Recrutement time

    Assessment of the time needed to recruit the current study population

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  23. Time before first connection

    Assessment of the time between logging sent and the first connection

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  24. Retention rate

    Assessement of the pourcentage of participants who finish every steps of the study

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  25. missing and incongruent data

    Percentage of missing and incongruent data

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  26. Time to complete the initial assessment

    Assessment of the mean time to complete the initial assessment (overall and per questionnaires)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  27. Response time per questionnaire

    The participant's time to answer each questionnaire

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  28. Questionnaires reliability index

    the congruence of questionnaires reliability index with the literature

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  29. website performance indicators

    Assessment of the time to request and compute website performance indicators

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  30. Participant's learner profile.

    The percentage of users classified in a learner profile.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  31. Active User Rate

    Percentage of registered users who are actively using the platform

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  32. Session duration

    Average amount of time users spend on the platform per session

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  33. Views per session

    Number of pages views per session

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  34. Login frequency

    Participant's login frequency

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  35. Completion rates

    Completion rate for each module of the platform PreCare

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  36. Bounce rate

    Percentage of visitors who navigate away from the site after viewing only one page

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  37. Participants' Pathways

    Assessment of the pathways followed by users (individual and cluster analysis), viewing and download rates

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  38. Content revisit rate

    Number of time users come back to a page

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  39. Platform uptime

    Tracking of the PreCare platform's uptime; time the platform has been operationnal during the study

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  40. Platform load times

    Tracking the PreCare platform's load time ; time it take the platform to display the requested page

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

  41. Platform's error rates

    Tracking the PreCare platform's error rates; number of error occuring

    Time frame: At 3 and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07201870
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Responsible party
Sylvain Iceta (Principal Investigator, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Oct 15, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Sylvain Iceta, MD, PhD
Contact
equipe.iceta@criucpq.ulaval.ca
+1 (418) 656-8711 ext. 4565

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion