CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07201766Updated Nov 25, 2025

The Efficacy of Intralesional Bleomycin as Compared to 5-Flourouracil (5-FU) and Triamcinolone Acetonide (TAC) for the Treatment of Keloids: A Randomized Control Trial.

An interventional study of intralesional bleomycin and 5-flourouracil and triamcinolone acetonide in Keloids Scars, sponsored by King Edward Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-25.

Sponsored by King Edward Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug bleomycin intralesionally is beneficial than intralesional 5FU and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treating Keloids. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does drug Bleomycin injected intrasleisonally lower the time duration to effectively treat the keloids in participants as compared to intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Flourouracil? Researchers will compare drug Bleomycin and 5FU plus Triamcinolone Acetonide and determine if bleomycin is better.

Participants will:

Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables. Effectiveness will be indicated by 50% reduction in POSAS score from the baseline.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug bleomycin intralesionally is beneficial than intralesional 5FU and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treating Keloids. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does drug Bleomycin injected intrasleisonally lower the time duration to effectively treat the keloids in participants as compared to intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Flourouracil? Researchers will compare drug Bleomycin and 5FU plus Triamcinolone Acetonide and determine if bleomycin is better.

An informed, written consent will be taken from the patients. Clinical data including demographic data will be recorded. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups by using random allocation software 2.0. Group A will be given 1ml if 0.9ml/22.5mg (25mg/ml) of 5-FU with 0.1 ml/4mg (40mg/ml) of Triamcinolone Acetonide, intralesionally 1cm apart, as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after every 2 weeks. Group B will be given injection Bleomycin 1.5 IU /ml (15 units vial dilution in 10ml Normal saline) 1 ml of this 1cm apart intralesionally as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after 2 weeks. Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables. Effectiveness will be indicated by 50% reduction in POSAS score from the baseline. All the data will be noted on a specially designed pro forma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keloids Scars

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intralesional injection
  • bleomycin
  • keloid scars
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All, patients aged 13-60 years of age, either gender enrolled for Keloid treatment under local anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to bleomycin, 5-FU DIABETICS VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY AT THE AFFECTED SITE
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The Efficacy of Intralesional Bleomycinin treatment of keloids

    Group B will be given injection Bleomycin 1.5 IU /ml (15 units vial dilution in 10ml Normal saline) 1 ml of this 1cm apart intralesionally as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after 2 weeks. Treatment will be given in two groups by a researcher blinded of the treatment being given in each group. POSAS patient and observer scar scale will be used to assess the keloids at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks and during follow ups afterwards, assessments will be carried out by another researcher who will assess the improvement on the scale of 0-no improvement, to excellent-75-100% improvement in terms of POSAS variables.

    Drug: intralesional bleomycin

  • Experimental
    The Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Triamcinolone Acetonide in treatment of keloids

    Group A will be given 1ml if 0.9ml/22.5mg (25mg/ml) of 5-FU with 0.1 ml/4mg (40mg/ml) of Triamcinolone Acetonide, intralesionally 1cm apart, as 0.1- 0.2ml/cm2 with max dose of 5ml per session and repeat after every 2 weeks.

    Drug: 5-flourouracil and triamcinolone acetonide

Interventions

  • Drugintralesional bleomycin

    The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

  • Drug5-flourouracil and triamcinolone acetonide

    The role of intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of keloids needs further establishment in terms of effective concentration, number of sessions and post treatment ulceration or/and hypopigmentation. Additionally, its comparison to the commonly used and proven, more effective combination than intralesional steroid alone i-e 5-FU in combination with the intralesional steroid, need also be done so that if found affective will be able to deal with the pathological scar as a 1 st line therapeutic drug. With a strong study design and an adequate sample size, and particularly in a specialized tertiary care clinical setup, Our study, seeks to get over the aforementioned limitations, and will delineates the appropriate guidelines for the management of these pathological scars, and suggest option with the best outcomes, as well as lesser side effects and recurrence rates.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Efficacy in terms of POSAS SCAR SCALE of Intralesional Bleomycin as compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Triamcinolone Acetonide(TAC) for the treatment of Keloids: A Randomized Control Trial

    The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, Pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable').The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. efficacy of intralesional bleomycin and combination of triamcinolone acetonide and 5-flourouracil in treating keloids, comparing the scar reduction in accordance with the patient and observer scar (POSAS) scale in two groups.

    Efficacy will be assessed by comparing the scar reduction on in accordance with the patient and observer scar (POSAS) scale in two groups. 50% reduction in score from baseline indicates that treatment is affective . It will be assessed at twice weekly interval till 12 weeks.

    Time frame: 4 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • King Edward Medical University
    Lahore, 54000, Pakistan
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Moravej H, Forghanian A, Dadkhahfar S, Mozafari N. Intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15730. doi: 10.1111/dth.15730. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PubMed 35871490 ↗
  • Khan HA, Sahibzada MN, Paracha MM. Comparison of the efficacy of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids. Dermatol Ther. 2019 Sep;32(5):e13036. doi: 10.1111/dth.13036. Epub 2019 Aug 8. PubMed 31361934 ↗
  • Bijlard E, Kouwenberg CA, Timman R, Hovius SE, Busschbach JJ, Mureau MA. Burden of Keloid Disease: A Cross-sectional Health-related Quality of Life Assessment. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017 Feb 8;97(2):225-229. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2498. PubMed 27378582 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07201766
Lead sponsor
King Edward Medical University
Responsible party
Shumaila Dogar (Consultant, King Edward Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Dec 2, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 25, 2025

Study contacts

Sayyeda Ifrah Ali, MBBS
Contact
dr.shumailadogar@gmail.com
+923078696383

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion