CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07199595Updated Sep 30, 2025

Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulfate Infusion in Craniotomy

An interventional study of Dexamedomedine and MgSO4 in Craniotomy Surgery, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-30.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the intraoperative effects of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate infusion on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in adult patients undergoing craniotomy

Read the detailed description

Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) are critical parameters in craniotomy patients . Effective modulation of these pressures during surgery can improve intraoperative stability and postoperative recovery . Dexmedetomidine (Dexamed) is a selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative and neuroprotective properties, known to reduce ICP without respiratory depression . Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO₄) acts as an NMDA receptor antagonist and vasodilator, promoting neuronal protection and improved cerebral blood flow . By using a lumbar drain catheter intraoperatively, direct and continuous measurement of ICP is feasible, offering real-time insight into the pharmacological effects of these agents on cerebral dynamics .

The underlying research question is as follows: Can intraoperative Dexmedetomidine as opposed to Magnesium sulfate result in better ICP and CPP management of adult craniotomy patients? Nonetheless, the individual basis of usage of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate in neurosurgeries has been supported by existing literature , but lack of direct comparative studies to determine the effects of the two drugs on real-time intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure in the craniotomy . This study aims to fill the existing gap in the literature by stating the continuity of ICP monitoring with a lumbar drain, thus offering a robust and standard control environment of comparison.

Intervention Protocol

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Group A - Dexmedetomidine Infusion

  • Loading Dose: 1 µg/kg IV over 10 minutes
  • Maintenance Infusion: 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h, titrated based on sedation level and hemodynamic response
  • Infusion will carry on till skin closure.
  • Monitoring: MAP, HR, ICP, CPP Group B - Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
  • Loading Dose: 20 mg/kg IV over 15 minutes
  • Maintenance Infusion: 10 mg/kg/h throughout the procedure
  • Infusion will carry on till skin closure.
  • Monitoring: MAP, HR, ICP, CPP
02

Conditions studied

  • Craniotomy Surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Elective craniotomy for supratentorial pathology
  • No contraindication to lumbar drain insertion
  • Baseline mental status is stable, allowing for a reliable postoperative neurological evaluation can be done
  • ASA physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy or current anticoagulation
  • Severe renal or hepatic dysfunction
  • Known allergy to study medications
  • traumatic brain injury
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dexmedetomidine

    Dexmedetomidine: loading dose 1 µg/kg IV over 10 min after induction and then maintenance dose 0.2- 0.7 µg/kg/hr based on hemodynamic response

    Drug: Dexamedomedine

  • Active comparator
    Mgso4

    Magnesium Sulfate: Used as an IV loading dose at 20 mg/kg IV over 17 minutes as an induction agent, followed by maintenance of 10 mg/kg/h to skin closure.

    Drug: MgSO4

Interventions

  • DrugDexamedomedine

    Group A (the Dexmedetomidine group): Dexmedetomidine: loading dose 1 µg/kg IV over 10 min after induction and then maintenance dose 0.2- 0.7 µg/kg/hr based on hemodynamic response.

  • DrugMgSO4

    Magnesium Sulfate: Used as an IV loading dose at 20 mg/kg IV over 17 minutes as an induction agent, followed by maintenance of 10 mg/kg/h

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ICP and CPP in craniotomy

    compare the intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) effects of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate infusion in a comparative study to determine the efficacy in adult patients undergoing craniotomy, continuous measurement was achieved with the help of a lumbar drain catheter.

    Time frame: o Pre-loading o After loading o Once the patient is in position (other than baseline) o After 30 min of incision (or every 30-60 min till skin closure)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07199595
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Hassan mostafa abdelbaky ahmed (Assistant lecturer, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2025
Start date
Oct 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2025

Study contacts

Hassan mostafa, Assistant lecturer
Contact
hassan.mostafa9444@gmail.com
01060264751
Ghada Aboalfadl, Professor
Contact
ghadafadl77@gmail.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion