CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07196137Updated May 7, 2026

Comparing the Effect of LTS and Air-Q sp3G LMA Use on Gastric Insufflation Using Ultrasound

An observational study in Laryngeal Masks Comparison, Elective Surgeries and Gastric Ultrasonography, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 1 Year to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
101
Ages
1 Year to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate gastric insufflation during the use of two different airway devices (Laringeal Tube Suction and Air Q sp3G Laryngeal Mask.

The secondary objectives of the study are to assess these two airway devices in terms of perioperative complications.

Read the detailed description

During general anesthesia, various devices are used to secure the airway. Supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) are among these and are used safely for short surgical procedures. Although SGAs are used to provide an easy and safe airway, none of them seal the trachea and ventilate only the lungs in the way that endotracheal intubation (ETT) does. Positive pressure ventilation provided at the supraglottic level cannot prevent air from escaping into the esophagus and, consequently, the stomach. Gastric distension is associated with perioperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and aspiration, and is considered an undesirable condition by anesthesiologists.

The study aims to compare the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Air Q sp3G Laryngeal Mask in terms of gastric insufflation. By measuring the diameters of the gastric antrum and recording their changes throughout the case, this study intend to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of the two airway devices.

ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) I-III class pediatric patients between the ages of 1-12 who will undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia will be included in the study. Randomisation will be done with a sealed envelope. The blinded researcher will collect and record data without knowing which airway device was chosen. Blind researcher will do gastric ultrasound measurements with Butterfly IQ+ ultrasound. Another researcher will insert the airway device and after insertion patients head will be covered, this researcher will not involve during data collection. After the data is collected, the airway device releated data will be recorded by non-blind researcher seperately.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laryngeal Masks Comparison
  • Elective Surgeries
  • Gastric Ultrasonography
  • Gastric Insufflation

Keywords

  • Laryngeal Mask
  • Airway Management
  • Ultrasonography
  • Child
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

ASA I-III class, ages between 1-12, patients who will undergo elective surgery under standard general anesthesia

Inclusion criteria

Patients with an ASA score of I-III for whom a supraglottic airway (SGA) is planned.

Operation time less than 2 hours. Patients who have read and accepted the informed consent form. Patients between the ages of 1 and 12, or their guardians, will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Patients who do not meet perioperative fasting criteria. Patients whose stomachs are not considered empty during the initial gastric ultrasound.

Patients with a known difficult airway. Patients with oropharyngeal or laryngeal anomalies. Patients who require the use of neuromuscular blockers. Patients with a history of a previously failed SGA placement. Patients with known reflux. Patients who do not give consent will not be included in the study.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • AIRQ

    After obtaining consent, patients will be asked to choose their airway device using a sealed envelope method. The patients' demographic data and ASA scores will be recorded. Gastric antrum diameters will be recorded at the beginning of the case, before induction. After the airway device is placed, the antrum diameters will be recorded. The antrum diameters will be recorded again after the surgery is complete, before the airway device is removed. Mechanical ventilator settings will be recorded. To ensure standardization, the tidal volume will be set to 7 ml per kg. No PEEP will be applied. Volume-controlled ventilation will be used. The lowest intraoperative saturation and the highest peak pressure that occurred will be recorded.The cuff pressure will be recorded after being inflated with the recommended volume. The time taken for airway device placement (the time from when it is picked up until Endtidal CO2 is observed) and any failed placements will be recorded.

  • LTS

    After obtaining consent, patients will be asked to choose their airway device using a sealed envelope method. The patients' demographic data and ASA scores will be recorded. Gastric antrum diameters will be recorded at the beginning of the case, before induction. After the airway device is placed, the antrum diameters will be recorded. The antrum diameters will be recorded again after the surgery is complete, before the airway device is removed. Mechanical ventilator settings will be recorded. To ensure standardization, the tidal volume will be set to 7 ml per kg. No PEEP will be applied. Volume-controlled ventilation will be used. The lowest intraoperative saturation and the highest peak pressure that occurred will be recorded.The cuff pressure will be recorded after being inflated with the recommended volume. The time taken for airway device placement (the time from when it is picked up until Endtidal CO2 is observed) and any failed placements will be recorded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gastric Antral Cross Sectional Area (T0)

    First gastric measurement: Before anesthesia induction gastric ultrasound will be done and gastric antrum cross sectional area will be recorded by blinded researcher

    Time frame: Just before anesthesia induction

  2. Gastric Antral Cross Sectional Area (T1)

    Second gastric measurement: after anesthesia induction and before the start of surgery gastric ultrasound will be done and gastric antrum cross sectional area will be recorded by blinded researcher

    Time frame: Right after the SGA is placed following anesthesia induction.

  3. Gastric Antral Cross Sectional Area (T2)

    Third measurement: Just before the end of anesthesia, after the surgery is completed gastric ultrasound will be done and gastric antrum cross sectional area will be recorded by blinded researcher.

    Time frame: Just before the end of anesthesia, after the surgery is completed

Secondary outcomes

  1. LTS Cuff Pressure Measurement

    If the choosen airway device is an LTS, after inserting LTS a cuff pressure measurement will be done by nonblind researcher. For masking the device that used even if a measurement is not taken, it will be treated as if it were.

    Time frame: Just after inserting a Laryngeal Tube Suction

  2. Maximum Airway Pressure (PPeak)

    The highest pressure measured by the mechanical ventilator will be recorded.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  3. Minimum Saturation

    The lowest measured saturation value.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  4. Spasm

    Incidence of spasm

    Time frame: Intraoperative and/or postoperative 2 hours

  5. The time taken for airway device placement and failed placement

    The time from the moment the airway device is touched until end-tidal CO2 is detected (Second)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  6. Postoperative Sore Throat

    Incidence of sore throat assessed by direct questioning

    Time frame: Postoperative 2 hours

  7. Postoperative Nausea and Vomitting

    Incidence of post operative nausea and vomitting assessed by direct questioning

    Time frame: Postoperative 2 hours

  8. Presence of blood on the supraglottic airway

    Nonblinded researcher will check if there is blood contamination on the SGA after removing it.

    Time frame: Just after removing the SGA

  9. Postoperative Cough

    Incidence of Cough assessed by direct questioning or physical examination

    Time frame: Postoperative 2 hours

  10. Need for nebulized medications or cool mist.

    Need for nebulized medications or cool mist for spasm or cough

    Time frame: Postoperative 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
    Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chandrakar S, Sreevastava DK, Bhasin S, Dhar M. Comparison of laryngeal tube suction II and proseal LMA in pediatric patients, undergoing elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):432-436. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_418_17. PubMed 29033724 ↗
  • Gasteiger L, Ofner S, Stogermuller B, Ziegler B, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children. Anaesthesist. 2016 Aug;65(8):585-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0192-1. PubMed 27380049 ↗
  • Genzwuerker HV, Finteis T, Slabschi D, Groeschel J, Ellinger K. Assessment of the use of the laryngeal tube for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a manikin. Resuscitation. 2001 Dec;51(3):291-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00410-5. PubMed 11738781 ↗
  • Scheller B, Schalk R, Byhahn C, Peter N, L'Allemand N, Kessler P, Meininger D. Laryngeal tube suction II for difficult airway management in neonates and small infants. Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):805-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.029. Epub 2009 May 2. PubMed 19410354 ↗
  • Katzenschlager S, Mohr S, Kaltschmidt N, Peterstorfer F, Weilbacher F, Gunther P, Ries M, Weigand MA, Popp E. Laryngeal mask vs. laryngeal tube trial in paediatric patients (LaMaTuPe): a single-blinded, open-label, randomised-controlled trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 1;32(2):123-130. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001178. Epub 2024 Sep 12. PubMed 39264430 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07196137
Lead sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2025
Start date
Sep 29, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 2, 2026
Completion
Jan 29, 2026
Last update
May 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion