An observational study in Mrkh Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome affects 1 in 4,500 women and consists of utero-vaginal aplasia in 46 chromosom XX women, most often diagnosed in the presence of primary amenorrhea. This diagnosis, occurring in adolescence during the period of identity formation, can have significant psychological repercussions. This malformation can alter the body image and personal relationships of affected patients, beyond the impact on their sexual lives. Management around the disclosure is a crucial moment for these patients. Individual or group psychological support is systematically offered.
Several international studies show that these patients experience a decline in their quality of life, and they are more anxious and depressed. Participation in support groups improves this state.
The objective of this study is therefore to better understand Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome and the issues patients may face. For this reason, it seems essential to us to evaluate the overall quality of life, the quality of sexual life, the psychological state and the gynecological follow-up of women before or after treatment for vaginal aplasia.
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome affects 1 in 4,500 women. In its classic form, it consists of uterovaginal aplasia in 46XX chromosom women, most often diagnosed in the presence of primary amenorrhea. This diagnosis, occurring in adolescence during the period of identity formation, can have significant psychological repercussions. Indeed, this uterovaginal aplasia is responsible for the inability to achieve vaginal penetration during sexual intercourse, the absence of menstruation, and the inability to conceive.
It is therefore easy to understand that this malformation can alter the body image and personal relationships of affected patients, beyond the impact on their sexual lives. Management around the time of disclosure is a crucial moment for these patients. Individual or group psychological support is systematically offered.
Before the 2010s, surgical techniques for vaginal creation were widely proposed, which was rejected in uterine transplant research protocols. Since 2014 (the first uterine transplant), expert physicians working with the Rare Gynecological Pathology Reference Centers have offered patients who wish to undergo vaginal self-dilation (the Frank technique). This neovagina allows for sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration. It is also an essential prerequisite in uterine transplant protocols, the criterion for which is a vaginal depth greater than 7 cm.
This condition requires a multidisciplinary approach. The discovery of this malformation raises many questions, due to the significant social, legal, and ethical implications: What do these patients think of their overall quality of life and their sexual quality? Do they have more psychological disorders than the general population? Are they well-monitored gynecologically? Does the treatment of utero-vaginal aplasia improve patients' quality of life? Several international studies show that these patients experience a decline in their quality of life; they are more anxious and more depressed. Participation in support groups improves this condition. These are older studies with cohorts of patients who most often benefited from surgical treatment, which is no longer the standard method today. These studies therefore do not allow an assessment of the current population.
The objective of this study is therefore to better understand Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome and the issues patients may face. To this end, we believe it is essential to assess the overall quality of life, sexual quality, psychological state, and gynecological follow-up of women before or after treatment for vaginal aplasia. Indeed, women must be able to fully experience their sexuality and achieve fulfillment through it. The impact of proposed medical treatments on sexuality must therefore be a concern for practitioners.
The evaluation of functional outcomes and the potential impact of our treatments must therefore be an integral part of follow-up.
Currently, there is little data regarding long-term outcomes after medical or surgical treatment.
The objective is to identify areas for improvement which could bring to the management and follow-up of this syndrome, in order to subsequently offer a personalized care pathway and better meet the needs of patients.
20 studies on the registry are indexed under Mullerian aplasia; 11 are open to participants now.
Browse Mullerian aplasia studies →University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 807 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and patients followed in gynecological consultation without the presence of this syndrome
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
For Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser patients:
For the control population:
Exclusion Criteria:
For Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser patients:
Other causes of uterine or vaginal aplasia, surgical or congenital
For the control population:
Women patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome
Other: Questionnaires · Other: Semi-directed interview
patients followed in the gynecology department but not suffering from Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome
Other: Questionnaires
questionnaires: WHOQOL-BREF (Quality of Life Study Questionnaire), FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), FSDS-R (The Femala sexual distress scale-revised), Rosenberg scale (self-esteem assessment)
Semi-directed interview on the treatment pathway and the impact of utero-vaginal aplasia on intimate and personal life
Evaluation of the overall quality of life of patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.
Comparison of the score obtained on the WHOQOL BREF questionnaire between women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and the control population (score from 0 to 100, 0 corresponding to the worst quality of life and 100 to the best possible quality of life)
Time frame: One hour after the inclusion
Evaluation of the quality of sexual life
FSFI questionnaire response score (Female sexual function Index). A total score of 26.55 has been proposed as a cut-off value for the diagnosis of sexual dysfunction, with the maximum score being 36
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Assessment of distress regarding sexuality
Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) questionnaire response score. A score \> 15 indicates distress related to dysfunctional symptoms and therefore sexual dysfunction. The response to the first question is the best reflection of sexual distress.
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Self-esteem assessment
Response score to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale questionnaire. Score obtained between 10 and 40, a score \<25 indicates very low self-esteem, and a score \>39 corresponds to high self-esteem
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Evaluation of gynecological monitoring of patients
existence or not of regular gynecological monitoring
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Qualitative evaluation of the impact of utero-vaginal aplasia on intimate life
questions asked during the semi-directed interview in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Evaluation of the functional impact of the treatment
The patient will be asked to participate in a semi-structured interview consisting of questions designed to analyze the impact of the condition and its treatment on the life experiences of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.
Time frame: 1 hour after the inclusion
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 12 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Toulouse →