ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07180940Updated Nov 6, 2026

Comparison of Perineural Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of 0.9%NaCl and Dexamethasone 4mg in Spine Disease and Spinal Diseases, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study aims to determine which of two medications-dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine-works better and is safer when used together with a local anesthetic (ropivacaine) in a type of nerve block called the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). This block helps reduce pain after lumbar spine surgery.

Read the detailed description

All participants will receive general anesthesia for surgery and, in addition, a nerve block on both sides of the lower back. The nerve block will be done with ultrasound guidance and will include ropivacaine plus either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups, and neither the patient nor the doctors checking pain after surgery will know which medication was used.

The main goal is to see how much opioid pain medicine patients need during the first 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Other things we will look at include how strong the pain is, how soon pain relief is necessary, if there are any side effects like nausea or low blood pressure, and if there are any complications related to the block.

This study will help doctors choose the best option to manage pain after spine surgery while reducing the need for opioids and their side effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spine Disease
  • Spinal Diseases

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spinal Diseases

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Diseases; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Diseases.

Browse Spinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 151 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to N/A (no limit)
  • Scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery (e.g., decompression or fusion) via posterior approach
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body weight ≥ 50 kg
  • Ability to provide written
  • Expected postoperative hospitalization of at least 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or to ropivacaine, dexamethasone, or dexmedetomidine
  • Infection at or near the site of block placement
  • Coagulation disorders or current use of anticoagulant therapy (not discontinued per guidelines)
  • Chronic opioid use or opioid dependence
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders interfering with pain assessment
  • Diabetes mellitus with poorly controlled glycemia (e.g., > 8%)
  • Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction
  • (BMI) > 40 kg/m²
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Refusal or inability to cooperate with the study protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Bilateral ESPB (2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 1ml 0.9% NaCl)

    Drug: 0.9%NaCl

  • Experimental
    Dexamethasone group

    Bilateral ESPB (2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 2mg dexamethasone)

    Drug: Dexamethasone 4mg

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine group

    Bilateral ESPB (2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 25ug dexmedetomidine)

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • Drug0.9%NaCl

    2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 2ml of 0.9% NaCl

  • 2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 2mg of dexamethasone

  • 2 x 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine with 25ug Dexmedetomidine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total opioid Consuption

    Cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 and 48 hours after surgery, converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. NRS

    Numerical Rating Scale (0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  2. NRS

    Numerical Rating Scale (0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  3. NRS

    Numerical Rating Scale (0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  4. NRS

    Numerical Rating Scale (0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  5. NRS

    Numerical Rating Scale (0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  6. Nerve injury

    Nerve damage assesment will be performed using the nerve damage score (N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- major -complete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome)

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  7. Nerve injury

    Nerve damage assesment will be performed using the nerve damage score (N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- major -complete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome)

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  8. Nerve injury

    Nerve damage assesment will be performed using the nerve damage score (N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- major -complete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome)

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  9. adverce effects

    nausea, vomitting, bradycardia, hypotension

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  10. Time to first rescue analgesia

    Time after surgery when the patient needs rescue analgesia for the first time

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  11. blood glucose

    Blood glucose concentration measured postoperatively

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  12. blood glucose

    Blood glucose concentration measured postoperatively

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  13. blood glucose

    Blood glucose concentration measured postoperatively

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  14. NLR - Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    NLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  15. NLR - Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    NLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  16. NLR - Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    NLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  17. PLR - Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    PLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  18. PLR - Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    PLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  19. PLR - Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

    PLR will be calculated from complete blood count results

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Nov 6, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026→Dec 30, 2025 (actual)
Nov 6, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2026→Dec 31, 2025 (actual)
Nov 6, 2026
Title
Comparison of Perineural Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Sep 30, 2026→Dec 30, 2025 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 31, 2026→Dec 31, 2025 (now actual)
    Title Comparison of Perineural Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
    + 4 other changes: verification date, oversight details, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07180940
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Dexamethasone · Dexmedetomidine

Start the discussion