CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07167251MIRA-HEPUpdated Sep 11, 2025

Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-related Hepatitis Using Low-dose Corticosteroids

An observational study in Immune Related Adverse Events, Immune-Mediated Hepatitis and Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of low-dose corticosteroids in managing grade 2-3 immune-related hepatitis in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. It aims to determine whether of 0.5-1miligram per kilogram bodyweight prednisolone is sufficient to manage immune-related hepatitis without the need for dose escalation or additional immunosuppressive therapy.

Read the detailed description

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including immune-related hepatitis, a potentially serious complication that affects up to 30% of patients undergoing ICI combination therapy. Current management guidelines recommend corticosteroids as the first-line treatment for moderate to severe irAEs. However, high doses of corticosteroids are associated with increased risks of infections, metabolic and psychiatric side effects, and potentially impaired anti-tumor efficacy. Retrospective data suggest that lower doses may be equally effective while reducing toxicity and preserving treatment efficacy.

This prospective, registry-based cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and outcomes of low-dose corticosteroid treatment for managing grade 2 or 3 IR-hepatitis. The hypothesis is that a corticosteroid "test dose" approach (0.5-1 mg/kg prednisolone) followed by early evaluation of clinical response can identify patients who benefit from reduced immunosuppression, thus minimizing side effects without compromising the effectiveness of ICI therapy.

Patients will be recruited from participating oncology centers where standardized management of IR-hepatitis has been implemented. Eligible participants are adult cancer patients who develop grade 2 or 3 IR-hepatitis during ICI therapy, excluding those with prior high-dose corticosteroid use, concurrent neurological or cardiac irAEs requiring high-dose corticosteroids, or underlying chronic liver diseases.

The primary endpoint is resolution of IR-hepatitis (defined as return to baseline or grade 1 liver function tests) within 8 weeks without corticosteroid dose escalation, additional immunosuppressive therapy, and with tapering to ≤10 mg/day prednisolone. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients requiring dose escalation, time to hepatitis resolution, cumulative corticosteroid exposure, relapse rates, occurrence of additional irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and identification of predictors of steroid-refractory hepatitis.

Patients will be followed for six months after the onset of IR-hepatitis. Follow-up assessments will align with standard clinical care, with no additional study-specific visits. Liver function tests, immunotherapy status, corticosteroid and immunosuppressive use, and occurrence of new irAEs will be recorded. A liver biopsy is recommended in refractory or ambiguous cases. Data will be collected via the REDCap system, ensuring standardized electronic data capture.

The study is powered to detect a successful resolution rate of at least 80% in patients with grade 3 IR-hepatitis treated with low-dose corticosteroids, assuming a null hypothesis threshold of 65%. Descriptive and exploratory statistical methods will be used to analyze the data, including Kaplan-Meier estimates for time-to-event outcomes and logistic regression for exploratory subgroup analyses.

This study addresses a critical gap in prospective evidence on the management of IR-hepatitis. By evaluating the efficacy and safety of a pragmatic, low-cost, low-toxicity intervention, it may inform future guidelines and serve as a foundation for a randomized non-inferiority trial. The study's design allows for real-world applicability while ensuring scientific rigor through harmonized protocols and data collection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Immune Related Adverse Events
  • Immune-Mediated Hepatitis
  • Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Immune-related adverse events
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • Immune-related hepatitis
  • immune-mediated hepatitis
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,486 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 63 is below the median of 205 across 1,680 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target patient population of this study are patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (either as monotherapy with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, or with an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody, or as combination therapy with an PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibody, or an PD-1 and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) antibody) who develop grade 2 or 3 Immune-related hepatitis independently of the treated cancer entity.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Cancer patients aged 18 years or older
  2. Treatment with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, or a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody, or a combination of a PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibody, or a PD-1 and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) antibody
  3. Occurrence of immune-related hepatitis grade 2 to 3 (as per judgment of the investigator)
  4. Ability of the patient to comply with the study procedures (management of immune-related hepatitis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous Immune-related hepatitis that required systemic therapy
  2. Treatment for Immune-related hepatitis has already been initiated with high-dose corticosteroids (>0.5 mg/kg body weight)
  3. Immune-related hepatitis with bilirubin > 1.5 ULN or clinical suspicion of cholangitis or elevated INR (beyond baseline)
  4. Immune-related hepatitis with grade 4 at first presentation
  5. Prior irAE treated with systemic immunosuppression
  6. Simultaneous immune-related neurological toxicity or immune-related myocarditis (since these usually have to be treated with high doses of corticosteroids)

    a. Patients with other immune-related adverse events may be included according to the investigator's judgment

  7. Known liver disease (e.g., autoimmune hepatitis, active hepatitis B, C or E, hemochromatosis, liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh Score B or C, primary biliary cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, Morbus Wilson)

    a. Patients with liver metastasis are eligible

  8. Patients receiving cancer treatment other than immune checkpoint inhibitors in parallel (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy).

    a. Patients who have received other cancer treatments in previous cycles are eligible, provided the treating physician does not assume any toxicity from the other medication.

  9. Condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days prior to occurrence of IR hepatitis. Stable corticosteroid doses of \< 10mg prednisone equivalent are allowed.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Immune-related hepatitis grade 2

    Grade 2 hepatitis is defined as an elevation of Aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels to 3-5 times the upper limit of normal, in accordance with the guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

    Drug: Low-dose corticosteroids for immune-related hepatitis grade 2

  • Immune-related hepatitis grade 3

    Grade 3 hepatitis is defined as an elevation of Aspartate transaminase and/or Alanine aminotransferase levels to 5-20 times the upper limit of normal, in accordance with the guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

    Drug: Low-dose corticosteroids for immune-related hepatitis grade 3

Interventions

  • DrugLow-dose corticosteroids for immune-related hepatitis grade 3

    Prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg orally for grade 3 IR-hepatitis; adjusted based on liver function; treatment per local standard of care.

  • DrugLow-dose corticosteroids for immune-related hepatitis grade 2

    Hold immunotherapy and reassess liver function at the treating physician's discretion. If liver function tests persistently worsen or continue to rise, consider administering prednisolone at 0.5 mg/kg body weight

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with resolution of their IR hepatitis CTCAE grade 3 within 8 weeks of onset

    Resoultion is defined as back to baseline or grade 1 without escalation of the corticosteroid dose, without additional immunosuppression and with discontinuation of corticosteroids or reduction to a maximum of 10 mg of Prednisolone

    Time frame: 8 weeks of onset

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with resolution of their IR hepatitis CTCAE grade 2 or 3 within 8 weeks of onset

    Resoultion is defined as back to baseline or grade 1 without escalation of the corticosteroid dose, without additional immunosuppression and with discontinuation of corticosteroids or reduction to a maximum of 10 mg of Prednisolone

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Proportion of patients requiring dose escalation of corticosteroids

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  3. Time to resolution of IR hepatitis

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  4. Peak dose of corticosteroids

    Maximum dose of corticosteroids used for the treatment of IR hepatitis

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  5. Cumulative dose of corticosteroids

    Cumulative dose of corticosteroids used for the treatment of IR hepatitis

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  6. Proportion of patients with relapse of their IR hepatitis to grade 2 or higher

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  7. Proportion of patients with incidence of irAE other than IR hepatitis

    Time frame: Outcome assessed at each visit until end of follow-up (6 months).

  8. Progression-free survival

    Time from first registration until the first documented disease progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants without an event will be censored at the date of last disease assessment.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  9. Overall survival

    Time from first registration until death from any cause. Participants who are alive at last follow-up will be censored at the date of last contact.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  10. Association of patient, disease and treatment characteristics and occurrence of corticosteroid refractory IR hepatitis

    Time frame: Patient, disease and treatment characteristics at baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Number of registered patients per months

    Time frame: At recruitment completion (last patient enrolled, up to 18 months)

  2. Retention rate

    The number and proportion of patients with a complete follow-up

    Time frame: At study completion (final follow-up, 6 months after inclusion of the last patient])

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Canton of Basel-City 4031, Switzerland
    Recruiting
  • Royal Marsden Hospital
    London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual Participant Data (IPD) will be available on request from qualified researchers after publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07167251
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Collaborators
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Odense University Hospital, UMC Utrecht
Responsible party
Andreas Schmitt (Deputy Physician, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 25, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2025

Study contacts

Andreas M Schmitt, MD
Contact
andreasmichael.schmitt@usb.ch
+41 61 265 50 74
Andreas M Schmitt, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion