CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07161713RESETUpdated Jul 20, 2026

SBU-RESET: RElaxation, Stress Reduction and Epigenetics Trial in Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Oncology-informed yoga and SMART in Cancer Survivors and Cancer Survivorship, sponsored by Barbara Nemesure. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-20.

Sponsored by Barbara Nemesure · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cancer survivors can experience health issues that cause chronic illness and lower quality of life. Yoga is a well-known holistic approach to health and overall well-being. Mindfulness has many benefits, including improved focus and less stress. This study aims to evaluate if yoga and/or mindfulness has a positive effect on cancer survivors social, emotional and physical well-being as well as their epigenetics. Epigenetics is how the environment can effect your genes; not by changing our DNA, but by turning genes on or off.

Read the detailed description

Randomized interventional pilot study to evaluate whether a mind-body intervention (Stress Management and Resiliency Training (SMART) or (oncology-informed yoga) influences patient-reported Quality of life (QoL) outcomes (physical/social/emotional/ functional well-being and symptom burden) in cancer survivors. A secondary (exploratory) aim is to evaluate whether these mind-body interventions impact epigenetics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer Survivors
  • Cancer Survivorship

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stony brook
  • survivor
  • yoga
  • mindfulness-based stress reduction
  • holistic
  • stress management
  • cancer survivor
  • long island
  • mindfulness
  • cancer
  • EORTC
  • questionnaires
  • surveys
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,492 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 50 across 7,258 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Barbara Nemesure as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults over 18 years old
  • Primary diagnosis: Lung Cancer, Colon Cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
  • Six months post cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy, targeted and immunotherapy). Patients with active disease (e.g. metastatic colorectal cancer) who are not receiving any cancer-directed treatment are eligible.
  • Able to provide a saliva sample
  • Gives informed consent and agrees to be randomly assigned
  • Able to complete the questionnaire(s) in English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with primary anal and/or primary rectal cancer.
  • Adult cancer survivors who are currently on an active treatment regimen.
  • Oral or any pathological conditions that can limit the ability to produce saliva.
  • Unable to participate in full length study period and follow up thereafter.
  • Is pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Currently practicing yoga or SMART
  • Those on corticosteroid therapy.
  • Documented fall or syncope within the last 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Yoga

    Oncology-informed yoga

    Behavioral: Oncology-informed yoga

  • Experimental
    SMART

    Stress Management and Resiliency Training

    Behavioral: SMART

Interventions

  • BehavioralOncology-informed yoga

    8 weekly sessions of cancer informed-yoga incorporating light movement, breathing techniques, and some meditation practices

  • BehavioralSMART

    SMART, developed by the Impact Foundation, is an adaptation of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) approach that incorporates other elements like mindful self-compassion, emotional literacy, and positive psychology principles to address the unique stressors faced by teachers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by EORTC QLQ-C30

    Patient reported quality of life measured using the validated quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30), developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. This scale includes 5 functional and 3 symptom scales, each scored as a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate a better outcome on functional scales and global health status, and a worse outcome on symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by EORTC QLQ-SURV100

    Patient-reported quality of life, measured using the EORTC QLQ-SURV100 a validated quality-of-life questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, evaluates survivorship-specific domains for QOL among disease-free survivors at least 1 year post-treatment, along with the validated EORTC disease-specific modules for the appropriate cancer type, and when applicable, 3 provisional site-specific survivorship modules. The SURV100 comprises 12 functional and 9 symptom scales, a symptom checklist, 4 single items, and 10 conditional items. Essentials survivorship scales consist of 73 items to evaluate short and long-term physical, psychological, and social domains unique to disease-free cancer survivors. Scores range from 0 to 100. A high score on a functional scale indicates a high/healthy level of functioning; a high score on the global health status/QL indicates a high QL, and a high score on a symptom item indicates a high level of symptomatology.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-ANL27

    Patient (anal carcinoma only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-ANL27, a validated 27-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with anal carcinoma. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-BIL21

    Patient (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-BIL21, a validated 21-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-BN20

    Patient (brain tumor only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-BN20, a validated 20-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with brain tumors. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-BR42

    Patient (breast cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-BR42, a validated 42-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with breast cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  7. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-CLL17

    Patient (chronic lymphocytic leukemia only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-CLL17, a validated 17-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  8. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-CR29

    Patient (colorectal cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-CR29, a validated 29-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer for patients with colorectal cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  9. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-CX24

    Patient (cervical cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-CX24, a validated 24-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with cervical cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  10. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-EN24

    Patient (endometrial cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-EN24, a validated 24-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with endometrial cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  11. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-GINET21

    Patient (neuroendocrine carcinoind only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-GINET21, a validated 21-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with neuroendocrine carcinoid. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  12. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-HCC18

    Patient (hepatocellular carcinoma only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-HCC18, a validated 18-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  13. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by EORTC QLQ-HL27

    Patient (Hodgkin Lymphoma only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-HL27, a validated 27-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  14. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by EORTC QLQ-HN43

    Patient (head \& neck cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-HN43, a validated 43-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with head \& neck cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  15. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-LC29

    Patient (lung cancer only) reported quality of life measured using the questionnaire QLQ-LC29, a validated 29-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with lung cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  16. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by EORTC QLQ-LMC21

    Patient (colorectal liver metastasis only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-LMC21, a validated 21-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with colorectal liver metastasis. It is used in conjunction with the core EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  17. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-MY20

    Patient (multiple myeloma only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-MY20, a validated 20-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with multiple myeloma. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  18. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-NHL-HG29

    Patient (high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma cancer only) reported quality of life measured using the questionnaire QLQ-NHL-HG29, a validated 29-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HG-NHL). It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  19. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-NHL-LG20

    Patient (low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-NHL-LG20, a validated 20-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL). It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  20. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-OES18

    Patient (esophageal cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-OES18 a validated 18-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with esophageal cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  21. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-OG25

    Patient (esophago-gastric cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-OG25, a validated 25-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with esophago-gastric cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  22. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-OV28

    Patient (ovarian cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-OV28, a validated 28-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with ovarian cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  23. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-PR25

    Patient (prostate cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-PR25, a validated 25-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with prostate cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  24. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-STO22

    Patient (gastric cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-STO22, a validated 22-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with gastric cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  25. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-TC26

    Patient (testicular cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-TC26, a validated 26-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with testicular cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  26. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-THY34

    Patient (thyroid cancer only) reported quality of life measured using questionnaire QLQ-THY34, a validated 34-item health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for patients with thyroid cancer. It is used in conjunction with either the core EORTC QLQ-C30 or the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire, depending on disease status, to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) QLQ-BR-SURV40

    Patient (breast cancer only) reported quality of life measured using the QLQ-BR-SURV40, a provisional 40-item survivorship-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in phase IV development by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for disease-free breast cancer patients 1 year post-treatment. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-BR42, a validated 42-item health-related quality of life questionnaire for breast cancer patients, and the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-PR-SURV19

    Patient (prostate cancer only) reported quality of life measured using the QLQ-PR-SURV19, a provisional 19-item survivorship-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in phase IV development by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for disease-free prostate cancer patients 1 year post-treatment. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-PR25, a validated 25-item health-related quality of life questionnaire for prostate cancer patients, and the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Patient Reported Quality of Life (QOL) by QLQ-CR-SURV33

    Patient (colorectal cancer only) reported quality of life measured using the QLQ-QLQ-CR-SURV33, a provisional 33-item survivorship-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in phase IV development by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for disease-free colorectal cancer patients 1 year post-treatment. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-CR29, a validated 29-item health-related quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer patients, and the core EORTC QLQ-SURV100 questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life, including aspects of symptom burden, physical condition, fatigue, emotional impact, and worries about health, which allows for better evaluation of treatments. An estimate of the average of the items in the scale is the raw score. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100-point range with higher scores indicating a higher ("better") level of functioning or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07161713
Lead sponsor
Barbara Nemesure
Responsible party
Barbara Nemesure (Professor, Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2025
Start date
Sep 17, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 17, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2026

Study contacts

Stony Brook Cancer Center Clinical Trials
Contact
CancerClinicalTrials@stonybrookmedicine.edu
631-728-7425
Chitra Thakur, PhD
Contact
Chitra.Thakur@stonybrookmedicine.edu
(631)-216-9086
Barbara Nemesure, PhD
principal investigator · Stony Brook University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion