ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07155954Updated Sep 4, 2025

Value of Super-resolution Ultrasonography in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes

An observational study in Lymphadenopathy, Lymphnode Metastasis and Lymphoma, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
779
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lymph nodes are one of the most important components of the human immune system, and superficial lymph node enlargement lacks specificity.

Ultrasound examination has been widely used in the diagnosis of lymph node lesions and is of great significance in distinguishing between benign and malignant. However, the two-dimensional and Doppler ultrasound features of different types of lymph node lesions overlap and intersect, and the blood flow perfusion information of lymph nodes can provide more information for differentiation.

At present, the widely used contrast-enhanced ultrasound is easier to evaluate blood flow perfusion and can display small blood vessels smaller than 100 microns. The diagnostic accuracy of cervical lymph nodes using contrast-enhanced ultrasound is 80-90%.

However, current contrast-enhanced ultrasound is limited by physical diffraction, with a resolution ranging from sub-millimeter to millimeter. This limitation hinders the visualization of small blood vessels or microcirculation by ultrasound, and parameters such as vascular size, spatial vascular pattern, and velocity of microcirculation are crucial for disease diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. Super resolution ultrasound (SRUS) is a new blood flow imaging technique. By tracking the movement trajectory of micro-bubbles instead of imaging the micro-bubbles themselves, the ultrasound diffraction limit can be exceeded to improve the sensitivity and image resolution of blood flow.

Thus the study aim to evaluate the feasibility of SRUS technology in distinguishing between benign and malignant lymph nodes, and compare the differences in blood flow distribution and perfusion index between benign and malignant lymph nodes under SRUS imaging.

Read the detailed description

The study aim to evaluate the feasibility of SRUS technology in distinguishing between benign and malignant lymph nodes, and compare the differences in blood flow distribution, perfusion index, CEUS parameters, blood supply mode between benign and malignant lymph nodes under SRUS imaging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Lymphnode Metastasis
  • Lymphoma
  • Lymphatic Tuberculosis
03

In context

Lymphadenopathy

77 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphadenopathy; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 779 is above the median of 139 across 22 observational studies indexed under Lymphadenopathy.

Browse Lymphadenopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with abnormal lymph nodes and who are scheduled for lymph nodes puncture or fine needle aspiration or surgery

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • (1)suggested abnormal lymph nodes indicated by ultrasonography; (2) Patients scheduled for lymph nodes puncture or fine needle aspiration or surgery; (3) Age greater than or equal to 18 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Pregnant and lactating women; (2)pathological results not indicating benign or malignant lymph nodes; (3) history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy ; (4) History of allergies to eggs, milk, and ultrasound contrast agents; (5) Patients with acute coronary syndrome, severe pulmonary hypertension, or acute respiratory distress syndrome.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
779 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • benign lymph nodes

    the lymph nodes are benign disease proved by pathology

    Diagnostic Test: SRUS imaging of the lymph nodes before surgery or biopsy

  • malignant lymph nodes

    lymph nodes are metastatic lymph nodes or lymphoma proved by pathology

    Diagnostic Test: SRUS imaging of the lymph nodes before surgery or biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSRUS imaging of the lymph nodes before surgery or biopsy

    Ultrasound contrast agent (Sonovue/Sonazoid) is administered to the patients through a peripheral vein. When the micro-bubbles enter the lymph nodes, super-resolution ultrasonography imaging will initiate immediately, to capture the trajectory of the micro-bubbles, thus construct a map of the microvascular distribution.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. benign or malignant pathology results from biopsy or surgery

    Time frame: within 1 month after SRUS imaging

Secondary outcomes

  1. The expression level of various immuno-histochemical indicators of lymph nodes

    Time frame: within 2 months after SRUS imaging

  2. Microvascular Quantitative Indices between benign and malignant lymph nodes by SRUS

    Time frame: within 2 months after the SRUS

  3. Microvascular Quantitative Indices between lymph node metastasis and lymphoma

    Time frame: within 2 months after the SRUS imaging

  4. Blood supply mode of CEUS between benign and malignant lymph nodes

    Time frame: within 2 months after the SRUS imaging

  5. Quantitative analysis parameters of CEUS between benign and malignant lymph nodes

    Quantitative analysis parameters of CEUS including AT, TTP, PKI, MTT, and AUC between benign and malignant lymph nodes

    Time frame: within 2 months after SRUS imaging

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 35 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2025
First posted
Sep 4, 2025
StartActual
Oct 23, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 22, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 22, 2027
Last update
Sep 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07155954
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2025
Start date
Oct 23, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 22, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 22, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Study contacts

li g cui
Contact
cuijuegang@126.com
+86 13910627163
li g cui, Chief Physician
study chair · Peking University Third Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion