CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07154043Updated Mar 4, 2026

Comparison of IPC Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to MLD Within CDT for BCRL

An interventional study of Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) and CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and BCRL, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT.

The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.

BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.

The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
  • BCRL

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
  • Manual Lymph Drainage
  • Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
  • Complete Decongestive Therapy
03

In context

Breast Cancer Lymphedema

148 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 119 interventional studies indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema.

Browse Breast Cancer Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female gender
  • Patients aged 18-65 years
  • Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
  • Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or >2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
  • Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
  • Completing breast cancer primary treatment at least 6 months ago (except hormone therapy/aromatase inhibitors)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Primary or bilateral lymphedema
  • Having active cancer
  • Presence of stage 3 lymphedema
  • Uncontrolled serious systemic disease (cardiopulmonary diseases, arterial or venous diseases, renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, scleroderma, Sudek's atrophy).
  • Current or recent (within the last 3 months) infection (cellulitis, lymphangitis) or deep venous thrombosis
  • Presence of open wounds
  • Using medications that may affect body fluid and electrolyte balance (diuretics, etc.).
  • Individuals with serious mental and sensory problems
  • Being pregnant
  • Body mass index >40 kg/m2
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Complete Decongestive Therapy plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Group

    Complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. In addition, patients will receive intermittent pneumatic compression with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

    Procedure: CDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)

  • Experimental
    Complete Decongestive Therapy without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

    This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. Manual lymph drainage will be replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression. Intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied with a device at 20-50 mmHg pressure for 40 minutes per session. The total treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

    Procedure: CDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

  • Active comparator
    Complete Decongestive Therapy Group

    This group will receive a complete decongestive therapy program consisting of manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. The treatment duration will be 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

    Procedure: Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)

Interventions

  • ProcedureComplete Decongestive Therapy (CDT)

    Manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise. 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

  • ProcedureCDT + Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)

    Complete decongestive therapy program including manual lymph drainage, multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, plus intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 115 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

  • ProcedureCDT without Manual Lymph Drainage plus Intermittent Pneumatic Compression

    Complete decongestive therapy consisting of multilayer bandaging, skin care, and exercise, with manual lymph drainage replaced by intermittent pneumatic compression at 20-50 mmHg for 40 minutes per session. Total duration: 75 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 3 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Arm volumetric measurements

    Arm volume will be calculated using circumferential measurements taken with a standard 7 mm measuring tape at 4 cm intervals along the arm. Segmental arm volumes (mL-cm³) will be calculated using the simplified frustum formula (Frustum Model). This formula, as described by Sitzia et al., has shown high correlation with water displacement measurements and is widely used in the literature as a valid and reliable indirect method for assessing lymphedema.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Range of Motion

    Goniometric measurements of the affected shoulder will be performed to assess flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation in patients with lymphedema.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  2. Quality of Life Measurement ULL-27

    ULL-27 quality of life questionnaire, developed specifically for upper extremity lymphedema patients. The scale has physical, psychological and social dimensions. It consists of 27 questions. A high score on the scale indicates that lymphedema negatively affects the quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  3. Arm Circumference Measurements

    To assess lymphedema severity, circumferential measurements of the affected and unaffected upper extremities will be performed. Patients' forearms will be in a supine position, elbows fully extended, and arms abducted at 90 degrees. Arm-hand circumference will be measured at four points: metacarpal region, wrist, 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, and 15 cm above the lateral epicondyle, using a non-stretchable 7 mm tape of 150 cm length. Measurements will be taken on both upper extremities, and the differences between sides will be recorded in centimeters.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  4. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) Questionnaire

    The Quick-DASH is an 11-item questionnaire used to assess activity limitations of the upper extremity in patients with lymphedema related to breast cancer. Each item is scored from 1 to 5, and total scores are summed. A total score of 0 indicates no disability, while a score of 100 indicates the highest level of disability. The Turkish version was validated in 2011 and has been found valid and reliable for assessing upper extremity activity limitations in breast cancer-related lymphedema.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  5. Upper Extremity Swelling (Visual Analog Scale)

    Swelling in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  6. Upper Extremity Heaviness (Visual Analog Scale)

    Heaviness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  7. Upper Extremity Tightness (Visual Analog Scale)

    Tightness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  8. Upper Extremity Pain (Visual Analog Scale)

    Pain in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

    Time frame: 1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  9. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with the exercise programs will be assessed using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not satisfied, 1 = slightly satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

  10. Perceived Improvement

    Patients' perceived improvement will be measured using the Patient Global Perceived Improvement Scale, asking participants to compare their current condition with baseline regarding lymphedema (1 = much better, 2 = better, 3 = slightly better, 4 = no change, 5 = slightly worse, 6 = worse, 7 = much worse). The Turkish version of this scale was validated and culturally adapted by Yalçın et al. in 2003, showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.75).

    Time frame: 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Pamukkale University
    Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Emre Bezmez, M.D. · Contact · +905319902220
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44. PubMed 16709254 ↗
  • LeBlanc M, Stineman M, DeMichele A, Stricker C, Mao JJ. Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2. PubMed 24095658 ↗
  • Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1470-y. Epub 2010 Apr 22. PubMed 20411289 ↗
  • Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1995 Mar;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x. PubMed 7620649 ↗
  • Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):134-45. PubMed 12564949 ↗
  • Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3-19. PubMed 32521126 ↗
  • De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WA, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S, De Groef A, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Belgrado JP, Vandermeeren L, Devoogdt N. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1221-1232. doi: 10.1177/0269215519835907. Epub 2019 Mar 18. PubMed 30880473 ↗
  • Keeley V, Riches K, Ward L, Franks PJ. A Prospective Preliminary Study Examining the Physiological Impact of Pneumatic Compression Dosing in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Oct;21(5):456-462. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0087. Epub 2023 May 4. PubMed 37140559 ↗
  • Kayali Vatansever A, Yavuzsen T, Karadibak D. The Reliability and Validity of Quality of Life Questionnaire Upper Limb Lymphedema (ULL-27) Turkish Patient With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema. Front Oncol. 2020 May 12;10:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00455. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32477925 ↗
  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. PubMed 12861145 ↗
  • Stanton AW, Badger C, Sitzia J. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology. 2000 Sep;33(3):122-35. PubMed 11019400 ↗
  • Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG. Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2260-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10976. PubMed 12436430 ↗
  • Szolnoky G, Lakatos B, Keskeny T, Varga E, Varga M, Dobozy A, Kemeny L. Intermittent pneumatic compression acts synergistically with manual lymphatic drainage in complex decongestive physiotherapy for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009 Dec;42(4):188-94. PubMed 20218087 ↗
  • Tastaban E, Soyder A, Aydin E, Sendur OF, Turan Y, Ture M, Bilgen M. Role of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):220-228. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888792. Epub 2019 Dec 4. PubMed 31795748 ↗
  • Uzkeser H, Karatay S, Erdemci B, Koc M, Senel K. Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3. Epub 2013 Aug 8. PubMed 23925581 ↗
  • Sanal-Toprak C, Ozsoy-Unubol T, Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Akyuz G. The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2019;52(2):82-91. PubMed 31525829 ↗
  • Ridner SH, Fu MR, Wanchai A, Stewart BR, Armer JM, Cormier JN. Self-management of lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011. Nurs Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;61(4):291-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824f82b2. PubMed 22565103 ↗
  • Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Lymphedema: 2023 Consensus Document of The International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2023;56(4):133-151. PubMed 39207406 ↗
  • Gursen C, Dylke ES, Moloney N, Meeus M, De Vrieze T, Devoogdt N, De Groef A. Self-reported signs and symptoms of secondary upper limb lymphoedema related to breast cancer treatment: Systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Sep;30(5):e13440. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13440. Epub 2021 Mar 18. PubMed 33733550 ↗
  • Orhan C, Uzelpasaci E, Baran E, Nakip G, Ozgul S, Aksoy S, Akbayrak T. The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Cancer Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;43(5):375-383. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000709. PubMed 30921030 ↗
  • Smoot B, Wong J, Cooper B, Wanek L, Topp K, Byl N, Dodd M. Upper extremity impairments in women with or without lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0118-x. Epub 2010 Apr 7. PubMed 20373044 ↗
  • Lee TS, Morris CM, Czerniec SA, Mangion AJ. Does Lymphedema Severity Affect Quality of Life? Simple Question. Challenging Answers. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Feb;16(1):85-91. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0049. Epub 2017 Apr 28. PubMed 28453410 ↗
  • Pinto M, Gimigliano F, Tatangelo F, Megna M, Izzo F, Gimigliano R, Iolascon G. Upper limb function and quality of life in breast cancer related lymphedema: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;49(5):665-73. Epub 2013 May 23. PubMed 23698473 ↗
  • Park JE, Jang HJ, Seo KS. Quality of life, upper extremity function and the effect of lymphedema treatment in breast cancer related lymphedema patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Apr;36(2):240-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.2.240. Epub 2012 Apr 30. PubMed 22639749 ↗
  • Dawes DJ, Meterissian S, Goldberg M, Mayo NE. Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Aug;40(8):651-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0232. PubMed 19020699 ↗
  • DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27. PubMed 23540561 ↗
  • Pappalardo M, Starnoni M, Franceschini G, Baccarani A, De Santis G. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recent Updates on Diagnosis, Severity and Available Treatments. J Pers Med. 2021 May 12;11(5):402. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050402. PubMed 34065795 ↗
  • McDuff SGR, Mina AI, Brunelle CL, Salama L, Warren LEG, Abouegylah M, Swaroop M, Skolny MN, Asdourian M, Gillespie T, Daniell K, Sayegh HE, Naoum GE, Zheng H, Taghian AG. Timing of Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At Risk? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Aug 28. PubMed 30165125 ↗
  • Mortimer P. Arm lymphoedema after breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):442-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70097-4. Epub 2013 Mar 27. No abstract available. PubMed 23540560 ↗
  • Burckhardt M, Belzner M, Berg A, Fleischer S. Living with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a synthesis of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul 1;41(4):E220-37. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.E220-E237. PubMed 24969257 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07154043
Lead sponsor
Pamukkale University
Responsible party
Oya Topuz (Professor Doctor, Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 4, 2025
Start date
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

Emre Bezmez, M.D.
Contact
emrebezmez@gmail.com
+905319902220
Oya Topuz, Professor
study director · Pamukkale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion