CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07151599Updated Nov 26, 2025

Efficacy of Combined Fractional Er:Glass and Thulium Lasers Versus Microneedling for Atrophic Acne Scars

An interventional study of Microneedling and Fractionated Er:Glass Laser combined to Fractionated Thulium Laser in Acne Scars, sponsored by University of Nove de Julho. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by University of Nove de Julho · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments for acne scars on the face. The study will test whether fractional lasers (Erbium:Glass and Thulium) lead to better improvement in acne scars than microneedling.

Read the detailed description

Acne scars are common and can have a lasting impact on self-esteem, social relationships, and quality of life. Several treatment options exist, but many patients continue to seek better results. Microneedling is a minimally invasive technique that uses small needles to stimulate skin repair. Fractional lasers, such as Erbium:Glass (1540-1550 nm) and Thulium (1927 nm), deliver energy into the skin to promote remodeling of deeper and more superficial layers. The combination of these two fractional lasers may provide a more comprehensive treatment approach for acne scars.

This clinical trial will directly compare these two options: microneedling versus the combined use of fractional Erbium:Glass and Thulium lasers. A total of 84 adults between 18 and 30 years old with atrophic acne scars will take part. Participants will be randomly chosen by a draw (like a lottery) to receive one of the two groups. Both groups will receive three treatment sessions, with four weeks between each session.

The main goal is to determine which treatment leads to greater improvement in acne scars. Improvement will be measured by independent evaluators who will compare standardized before-and-after photographs using a grading scale. Participants will also report their own satisfaction with the results and how well they tolerated the treatments. Follow-up assessments will occur up to 90 days after the last session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne Scars

Keywords

  • Fractionated Erbium Glass Laser
  • Fractionated Thulium Laser
  • Microneedling
  • Percutaneous Induction of Collagen
  • Acne Scars
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Nove de Julho is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (13%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I to VI
  • Presence of atrophic acne scars on the face

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensated systemic diseases
  • Any active infection (e.g., viral such as herpes, bacterial, or fungal)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Presence of hypertrophic or keloid scars
  • Current use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications
  • History of hemophilia or coagulation disorders
  • Current use of anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids
  • Use of retinoids, including isotretinoin, within the past 6 months
  • Exposure to sunlight within the past 15 days
  • Undergoing any aesthetic facial treatment or having undergone scar treatments in the facial region within 180 days prior to study initiation
  • Presence of active acne (occasional isolated lesions will not be considered exclusion criteria)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Microneedling

    Microneedling performed with an electronic pen and sterile disposable cartridge of 12 needles at 2mm depth

    Device: Microneedling

  • Experimental
    Fractionated Er:Glass and Thulium Lasers

    Fractional Erbium:Glass laser is applied first, focused on scarred areas, followed immediately by fractional Thulium 1927 nm over the full face.

    Device: Fractionated Er:Glass Laser combined to Fractionated Thulium Laser

Interventions

  • DeviceMicroneedling

    Microneedling performed with an electronic pen and sterile disposable cartridge with 12 needles and 2mm depth, three treatment sessions at four-week intervals.

  • DeviceFractionated Er:Glass Laser combined to Fractionated Thulium Laser

    Fractional Erbium:Glass laser will be applied first, focused on scarred areas (50 mJ, 15 ms e 100 PPA) , followed immediately by fractional Thulium 1927 nm over the full face (10 mJ, 1 ms e 100 PPA), three treatment sessions at four-week intervals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ECCA grading scale (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné)

    The ECCA is a validated scale that quantifies acne scars through both qualitative and quantitative components. Scar type is weighted by a numerical factor (15-30 for atrophic scars and elastosis; 40-50 for hypertrophic/keloid scars) and multiplied by the number of lesions, graded on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = \<5 scars; 2 = 5-20 scars; 3 = \>20 scars. The global score ranges from 0 to 540, with higher scores indicating greater severity. In this study, participants with hypertrophic or keloid scars will be excluded; therefore, only atrophic scar subtypes will be scored (subcategory 1).

    Time frame: Assessments will be performed by blinded evaluators using standardized photographs at baseline.

  2. ECCA grading scale (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné)

    The ECCA is a validated scale that quantifies acne scars through both qualitative and quantitative components. Scar type is weighted by a numerical factor (15-30 for atrophic scars and elastosis; 40-50 for hypertrophic/keloid scars) and multiplied by the number of lesions, graded on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = \<5 scars; 2 = 5-20 scars; 3 = \>20 scars. The global score ranges from 0 to 540, with higher scores indicating greater severity. In this study, participants with hypertrophic or keloid scars will be excluded; therefore, only atrophic scar subtypes will be scored (subcategory 1).

    Time frame: Assessments will be performed by blinded evaluators using standardized photographs at 30 days after the last session.

  3. ECCA grading scale (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné)

    The ECCA is a validated scale that quantifies acne scars through both qualitative and quantitative components. Scar type is weighted by a numerical factor (15-30 for atrophic scars and elastosis; 40-50 for hypertrophic/keloid scars) and multiplied by the number of lesions, graded on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = \<5 scars; 2 = 5-20 scars; 3 = \>20 scars. The global score ranges from 0 to 540, with higher scores indicating greater severity. In this study, participants with hypertrophic or keloid scars will be excluded; therefore, only atrophic scar subtypes will be scored (subcategory 1).

    Time frame: Assessments will be performed by blinded evaluators using standardized photographs at 16 weeks after the last session.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

    Blinded evaluators will perform side-by-side comparisons of baseline vs. 30-day photographs. Improvement will be graded on a 5-point ordinal scale.

    Time frame: From baseline to 30 days after the end of the treatment

  2. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

    Blinded evaluators will perform side-by-side comparisons of baseline vs. 16 weeks photographs. Improvement will be graded on a 5-point ordinal scale.

    Time frame: From baseline to 16 weeks after the end of the treatment

  3. Goodman & Baron Acne Scar Scale

    Scars will be categorized according to morphology, recording the number of mild, moderate, severe, and hypertrophic lesions. An algorithm will generate a total score (range: 0-84), with higher scores indicating greater severity and number of scars. This scoring system reflects both the type and frequency of lesions, with higher values representing worse scar severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Goodman & Baron Acne Scar Scale

    Scars will be categorized according to morphology, recording the number of mild, moderate, severe, and hypertrophic lesions. An algorithm will generate a total score (range: 0-84), with higher scores indicating greater severity and number of scars. This scoring system reflects both the type and frequency of lesions, with higher values representing worse scar severity.

    Time frame: 30 days after the end of the treatment

  5. Goodman & Baron Acne Scar Scale

    Scars will be categorized according to morphology, recording the number of mild, moderate, severe, and hypertrophic lesions. An algorithm will generate a total score (range: 0-84), with higher scores indicating greater severity and number of scars. This scoring system reflects both the type and frequency of lesions, with higher values representing worse scar severity.

    Time frame: 16 weeks after the end of the treatment

  6. Improvement perceived by patients

    articipants will self-assess their improvement using a quartile grading scale. This measure captures the subjective satisfaction of the participant and complements the blinded clinical assessments.

    Time frame: 30 days after the end of the treatment

  7. Satisfaction reported by patient

    Satisfaction reported by Likert scale.

    Time frame: 30 days after the end of the treatment

  8. Downtime

    Recovery time will be recorded in days and defined as the period in which the participant experiences visible clinical signs (such as erythema or edema) and local discomfort (burning, pain, or itching), leading to physical or aesthetic limitations. Participants will complete a standardized daily questionnaire, administered via telephone contact by the study investigator, to report the presence of symptoms and whether they avoided public activities due to skin appearance. This outcome aims to quantify, in a subjective and functional way, the short-term impact of treatment on quality of life, social activities, and overall tolerability.

    Time frame: From the day after each treatment session until up to 9 days post-treatment.

  9. Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm straight line where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst possible pain." Immediately after each session, participants will be asked to mark the point on the line that best represents the pain experienced during the procedure.

    Time frame: Immediately after each treatment session.

  10. Adverse Events

    Participants will be contacted daily via WhatsApp message or phone call to report the presence or absence of adverse events, including pain, erythema, edema, infection, discharge, crusts, hyperpigmentation, or scarring.

    Time frame: Daily for 10 days after each treatment session.

  11. Adverse Events

    Participants will be contacted daily via WhatsApp message or phone call to report the presence or absence of adverse events, including pain, erythema, edema, infection, discharge, crusts, hyperpigmentation, or scarring.

    Time frame: Weekly until 30 days after the last treatment session.

  12. Adverse Events

    Participants will be contacted daily via WhatsApp message or phone call to report the presence or absence of adverse events, including pain, erythema, edema, infection, discharge, crusts, hyperpigmentation, or scarring.

    Time frame: 60 days after the last treatment session.

  13. Adverse Events

    Participants will be contacted daily via WhatsApp message or phone call to report the presence or absence of adverse events, including pain, erythema, edema, infection, discharge, crusts, hyperpigmentation, or scarring.

    Time frame: 90 days after the last treatment session.

  14. Facial Acne Scar Quality of Life - FASQoL

    A ten questions instrument, presenting 5 answers for each question, giving 0-4 points. A total of 0-40 points will be find, being higher the higest impact in quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Facial Acne Scar Quality of Life - FASQoL

    A ten questions instrument, presenting 5 answers for each question, giving 0-4 points. A total of 0-40 points will be find, being higher the higest impact in quality of life.

    Time frame: 30 days after the end of the treatment

  16. Dermatology Life Quality index DLQI

    The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a 10-question, self-administered questionnaire for adults (16+) to measure the impact of skin disease on their daily lives over the past week.

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Dermatology Life Quality index DLQI

    The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a 10-question, self-administered questionnaire for adults (16+) to measure the impact of skin disease on their daily lives over the past week.

    Time frame: 30 days after the end of the treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Espaço Conceito Medical San
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All colected IPD will be shared, except individual photographs.

Supporting information: Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07151599
Lead sponsor
University of Nove de Julho
Responsible party
Christiane Pavani (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Combined Fractional Erbium:Glass and Thulium Lasers Versus Microneedling for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars, University of Nove de Julho) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2025
Start date
Oct 16, 2025
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Luciana Khachikian, Master student
Contact
lucianacamargo@uni9.edu.br
+5511989969924
Christiane Pavani, PhD
study chair · University of Nove de Julho
Luciana Khachikian, Master Student
principal investigator · University of Nove de Julho

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion