ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07138924Updated Aug 24, 2025

Graston Technique vs Dynamic Oscillation Stretching Technique For High Heel Users And Its Impact On Body Posture

An interventional study of Graston Technique and Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique in Hyperlordosis, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-24.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Aug 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In high heel users, most of the previous work has focused on the lower limb. However, we did not find any study that specifically targeted the lumbar region. The novelty of this study lies in raising awareness that high heel users experience a full-body postural disturbance. While studies had involved the lower limb, but it is crucial to also include the lumbar region. This is because high heel users often feel more pain in the lower limb, which may be leading us to focus solely on lower limb and neglect the lumbar region. However, the mechanics of the lumbar region are also deteriorating along with the lower limb, which may lead to musculoskeletal related issues to high heel users in future. In Pakistan, no previous research is conducted, That compare the effect of Graston Technique Versus DOST in female wearing high heels and its impact on posture.

Read the detailed description

The consequences of wearing high heels included increased bending of the hips and knees, anterior pelvic tilting, and increased lumbar lordosis in the spine. Wearers of high heels reported reduced dorsiflexion. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Graston technique and Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch (DOST) technique in improving lumbar lordosis, anterior pelvic tilting and function status in high heel users. This study is randamized control trial. The sample size of this study is 30 participants which would be divided into two group, 15 each. Non-probability Convenience sampling will be used and participants are randomly assigned into Group A (Graston Technique) Group B (DOST) through envelope sealed method after baseline assessment . The participants of both group were evaluated on three occasions; (i) baseline, (ii) 5th session and (iii) 12th session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperlordosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hyperlordosis Anterior pelvic tilt Graston Technique Dynamic Oscillating Stretch
03

In context

Swayback

10 studies on the registry are indexed under Swayback; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Swayback studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,193 studies on the registry; 650 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Only female were included

      • Age group 20 to 40 years.
      • Duration of wearing HH: >1 yr.
      • Wearing HH for > 3 times a wk. and 5 hrs/ day.
      • Heel height: 2 inch and above
      • Decreased ankle Dorsiflexion (less than 17 degrees)
      • Lumber lordosis increased (> 40).
      • Muscle tightness (Paraspinal, hamstring, gastrocnemius and soleus).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • DVT, , infection.

      • Eczema or other skin diseases.
      • MSK injury or surgery of LL.
      • Sciatica or other Neuropathy/ Neurological disorder
      • Acute Cardio-Respiratory disorder
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Graston Technique

    Experimental Group A: Graston technique on calf and Paraspinal (erector spinae) muscles with conservative physiotherapy treatment plan i.e. hot pack for 10-15 min (calf muscles) calf stretches (10 reps x 2 sets) and post session cold pack for 5 min.

    Other: Graston Technique

  • Active comparator
    Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique (DOST)

    Experimental Group B: Dynamic oscillation stretching technique on gastrocnemius, soleus, and hamstring with conservative physiotherapy treatment plan i.e. hot pack for 10-15 min (calf muscles) calf stretches (10 reps x 2 sets) and post session cold pack for 5 min.

    Other: Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique

Interventions

  • OtherGraston Technique

    Firstly, apply a moisturizer or gel to affected part. Then gentle strokes are applied from proximal to distal direction to assess trigger point or taut band. After knowing the exact area, apply strokes gently with minimum force in all directions by keeping tool in 30- 60-degree angle. Total Application time will be between 40-120 seconds. conservative physiotherapy treatment plan is hot pack for 10-15 min, calf stetches 10 reps x 2 sets and post session cold pack for 5 min. Home exercise plan is william training i.e. single knee to chest, double knee to chest, pelvic tilts, iliospoas stretch, hamstring stretch and squat (10reps x1 set)

  • OtherDynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique

    Passively stretch that is at the first point of stretch sensation. The next component to DOS, 2-sec, passive stretch with slow oscillation. Total 10 reps x 2 sec hold oscillations x 3 sets.conservative physiotherapy treatment plan is hot pack for 10-15 min, calf stetches 10 reps x 2 sets and post session cold pack for 5 min. Home exercise plan is william training i.e. single knee to chest, double knee to chest, pelvic tilts, iliospoas stretch, hamstring stretch and squat (10reps x1 set)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Flexicurve Ruler

    The Flexicurve ruler allows us to measure the curves of your spine. The Flexicurve is a strip of flexible metal covered in plastic. It will place at the top of the back then gently bend it so it reflects the shape of the backbone.

    Time frame: 3 week

  2. Inclinometer

    Inclinometer is a specialized tool used to measure angles and range of motion of joints. It is used to measure pelvic tilt.

    Time frame: 3 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gonimeter

    A device that measures an angle or allows an object to be rotated to a certain position. In orthopedics, the former description is more accurate. Goniometry is the art and science of measuring joint ranges in each plane of the joint

    Time frame: 3 week

  2. Lower Extremity Functional Scale

    The LEFS can be used to evaluate the functional impairment of a patient with a disorder of one or both lower extremities. It can be used to monitor the patient over time and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention.

    Time frame: 3 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gulberg Green Campus of Riphah International University, Islamabad
    Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chien HL, Lu TW, Liu MW. Effects of long-term wearing of high-heeled shoes on the control of the body's center of mass motion in relation to the center of pressure during walking. Gait Posture. 2014 Apr;39(4):1045-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 19. PubMed 24508016 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2024 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 4 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2025
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
StartActual
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07138924
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2025
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 24, 2025

Study contacts

Ramsha Tariq
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion