ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07132489VaBiNoRUpdated Aug 29, 2025

Validation of New Biomarkers for Predicting No-Reflow in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI

An observational study in Myocardial Infarction and No Reflow Phenomenon, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-29.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the diagnostic value of the selected emerging biomarkers in predicting the no-reflow phenomenon among patients presenting with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. These biomarkers include:

HbA1c/C-peptide ratio

Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.

Neutrophil/HDL ratio

Read the detailed description

The no-reflow phenomenon is a well-recognized complication following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite successful opening of the occluded coronary artery, impaired myocardial perfusion may persist, significantly increasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Recent research has identified several novel biomarkers that may help predict the risk of no-reflow. These include metabolic, inflammatory, and hepatic-renal markers that reflect the systemic milieu of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Among these emerging biomarkers, the following are of particular interest:

  • HbA1c/C-peptide ratio: Reflects chronic glycemic burden and residual beta-cell function.
  • Neutrophil/HDL ratio: A combined marker of inflammation and lipid-associated atheroprotection.
  • Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score: A composite liver function marker potentially linked to systemic inflammation and perfusion status.

This study aims to validate the prognostic value of these biomarkers in predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

To validate the clinical utility of selected emerging biomarkers in predicting the no-reflow phenomenon among patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Thus , our objective is to investigate :

  1. To investigate whether the HbA1c to C-peptide ratio can serve as a predictive marker for no-reflow, reflecting the impact of chronic glycemic control and pancreatic beta-cell function.
  2. To evaluate the neutrophil-to-HDL ratio as a potential indicator of no-reflow, representing the balance between systemic inflammation and endogenous vascular protection.
  3. To examine the prognostic value of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score in identifying patients at higher risk for no-reflow, considering the systemic influence of hepatic function and inflammation.
02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • No Reflow Phenomenon
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,270 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 371 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is below the median of 568 across 814 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will include patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are admitted to the [specify hospital/center] and undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Suitable for and undergoing timely primary PCI based on symptoms and clinical judgment
  • Provision of

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous MI, PCI, or CABG
  • Known chronic inflammatory or diseases
  • Advanced renal or hepatic failure
  • Active infection or at presentation
  • Incomplete data or refusal to consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Month
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • No-Reflow Group

    STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI who develop angiographic no-reflow, defined as final TIMI flow ≤2 and/or Myocardial Blush Grade (MBG) 0-1 after stent deployment in the absence of mechanical obstruction (no dissection, spasm, residual thrombus, or significant residual stenosis). Planned enrollment: 56.

    Diagnostic Test: HbA1c/C-peptide ratio Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Neutrophil/HDL ratio

  • Reflow Group

    STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI who achieve successful epicardial and microvascular reperfusion, defined as final TIMI 3 flow and MBG 2-3 after PCI. Planned enrollment: 56.

    Diagnostic Test: HbA1c/C-peptide ratio Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Neutrophil/HDL ratio

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testHbA1c/C-peptide ratio Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Neutrophil/HDL ratio

    1. To investigate whether the HbA1c to C-peptide ratio can serve as a predictive marker for no-reflow, reflecting the impact of chronic glycemic control and pancreatic beta-cell function. 2. To evaluate the neutrophil-to-HDL ratio as a potential indicator of no-reflow, representing the balance between systemic inflammation and endogenous vascular protection. 3. To examine the prognostic value of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score in identifying patients at higher risk for no-reflow, considering the systemic influence of hepatic function and inflammation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c/C-peptide ratio predictive accuracy for no-reflow phenomenon

    Diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c/C-peptide ratio for predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to PCI)

  2. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score predictive accuracy for no-reflow phenomenon

    Diagnostic accuracy of ALBI score for predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to PCI)

  3. Neutrophil/HDL ratio predictive accuracy for no-reflow phenomenon

    Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil/HDL ratio for predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to PCI)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of HbA1c/C-peptide ratio, Neutrophil-to-HDL ratio, and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score with in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

    HbA1c/C-peptide ratio (unit: ratio, measured from immunoassay-derived HbA1c and C-peptide levels), Neutrophil-to-HDL ratio (unit: ratio, derived from complete blood count and serum HDL measurement), and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score (unit: score, calculated from serum albumin \[g/dL\] and total bilirubin \[mg/dL\]) will be correlated with the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) \[unit: % of patients experiencing MACE\].

    Time frame: Baseline to hospital discharge.

  2. Correlation of HbA1c/C-peptide ratio, Neutrophil-to-HDL ratio, and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score with 1-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

    HbA1c/C-peptide ratio (unit: ratio, measured from immunoassay-derived HbA1c and C-peptide levels), Neutrophil-to-HDL ratio (unit: ratio, derived from complete blood count and serum HDL measurement), and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score (unit: score, calculated from serum albumin \[g/dL\] and total bilirubin \[mg/dL\]) will be correlated with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-month follow-up \[unit: % of patients experiencing MACE\].

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-month follow-up.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Sep 2028, 36 months later.

Of 296 non-industry observational studies under Myocardial Infarction, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 140. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 333 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 114.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 11, 2025
First posted
Aug 20, 2025
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2028
Last update
Aug 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07132489
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Hossam Eldin Alaa Abdelhafiz mohamed (Principal investigator, cardiology Department, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 29, 2025

Study contacts

Hossam E. A. Abdelhafiz
Contact
Hossamalaa203040@gmail.com
00201143999651
Marwan S. Mahmoud
Contact
Hossam H. Ali
principal investigator
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion