CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07115966TARGETUpdated Sep 2, 2025

Impact of a Simple Automated Best Practice Alert (BPA) on Quantity and Quality of In-hospital Antibiotic Use in a Tertiary and Three Secondary Hospitals

An interventional study of Computerized decision support by best practice alert (BPA) in Antibiotic Prescriptions and In-Patient Treatment, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-02.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial is to assess the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention: a simple, automated Best Practice Alert (BPA) that reminds prescribers to reevaluate antibiotic therapy after 72 hours (or 24 hours for prophylaxis), in accordance with guideline recommendations. The primary hypothesis is that this simple BPA reduces antibiotic use in terms of quantity (amount and duration) and quality (spectrum breadth), measured by days of antibiotic spectrum coverage at the patient level (primary outcome), as well as at both patient and cluster levels using various metrics of antibiotic use. The trial will introduce the BPA in a stepwise manner, with all wards implementing it by the end. It will compare the intervention period to the baseline (pre-intervention) and control periods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Antibiotic Prescriptions
  • In-Patient Treatment

Keywords

  • best practice alert
  • quanlity and quantity of antibiotic use
  • in-patients
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 724 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All inpatient wards with at least 50 PA/year, except those listed in the exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Ward level:

  • Emergency departments
  • Outpatient clinics
  • Haemato-oncologic stem cell transplant wards, where daily ID visits are performed
  • ICU wards, where daily ID visits are performed

Indvidual patient data for analysis

  • Refusal of institutional general consent for further use of patient data
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Best practice alert (BPA)

    Intervention: The BPA will appear to the prescribing physician for every patient on the respective ward. Activation of the BPA is ward-based. A total of 58 wards will be stratified according to their focus-surgical, medical, intermediate care, rehabilitation, or pediatric-and grouped based on their baseline antibiotic consumption, measured in days of antibiotic spectrum coverage per patient admission (DASC/PA). This stratification will result in 9 to 10 clusters across 6 groups. The clusters will then be randomized to the timing of BPA activation, and all wards will sequentially switch to the BPA arm every 2 months over a 12-month period. By the end of the trial, after 12 months, all wards will be using the automated BPA.

    Behavioral: Computerized decision support by best practice alert (BPA)

  • No intervention
    Controls - No BPA

    Control: standard patient care with no BPA activated. By the end of the trial, after 12 months, all wards will be using the automated BPA.

Interventions

  • BehavioralComputerized decision support by best practice alert (BPA)

    The antimicrobial stewardship intervention encourages prescribers by a simple alert to follow guidelines for reviewing antimicrobial prescriptions after a set timeframe for potential de-escalation to targeted therapy or discontinuation of the antibiotics, as recommended by national and international guidelines. An automated simple BPA will trigger after an antibiotic prescription with therapeutic indication (72 hours) or surgical prophylaxis (24 hours, reminding prescribers to reassess treatment for possible de-escalation, adaption to targeted therapy, or cessation. If ignored, the prescription remains unchanged, but the alert will continue until addressed. Prescribers must select reasons for not changing the prescription, such as pending microbiology results. The control group corresponds to the inpatient wards not yet receiving the BPA, where antibiotics are managed according to "standard-of-care".

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) per patient admission (PA)

    Overall score of days of antibiotic spectrum coverage per patient admission. The score is composed of the breadth of the bacterial spectrum covered by the administered antibiotic (according to Kakiuchi 2022 - the broader the antibiotic spectrum, the higher the score), summed over the number of days the antibiotic is given. Accordingly, there are no maximum or minimum values

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) per patient antibiotic day (PAD)

    Overall score of antibiotic spectrum coverage per patient antibiotic day. The score is composed of the breadth of the bacterial spectrum covered by the administered antibiotic (according to Kakiuchi 2022 - the broader the antibiotic spectrum, the higher the score), summed over the number of days the antibiotic is given. Accordingly, there are no maximum or minimum values.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Days of treatment (DOT) per 100 patient days (PD) and per patient admission on ward level

    Overall days of treatment (DOT) per 100 patient days (PD) and per patient admission (PA) on ward level

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient days (PD) and per patient admission (PA)

    Overall defined daily doses) per 100 patient days (PD) and per patient admission (PA) on ward level. Standard metrics recommended by WHO for international benchmarking.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Antibiotic (AB) days per patient admission (PA)

    No of days an AB per PA gives the proportion of days antibiotics have been applicated, irrespective of single, double, triple combinations, in relation to total PA

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. In hospital mortality

    All cause in hospital mortality

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Hospital length of stay (LOS)

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Unplanned readmission within first 30 days after discharge

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Patient admission to IMC/ICU from studied wards

    Number and proportion of patient admissions to IMC/ICU from studied wards

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Number of Infectious diseases (ID) consultation per patient admission (PA)

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. In hospital C. difficile infection incidence within hospital stay per patient admission (PA) and per 100 patient days (PD)

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Inhospital incidence of multi-drug-resistant-organisms (MDRO) detection per100 patient days (PD) or per patient admission (PA)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inselgruppe
    Bern, 3007, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07115966
Lead sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2025

Study contacts

Philipp Jent, PD
study chair · Inselgruppe Bern
Nasstasja Wassilew, Dr. med.
principal investigator · Inselgruppe Bern

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion