CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07107165Updated Apr 1, 2026

Psychosocial and Behavioral Intervention for Stem Cell Transplant Patients and Their Family Caregivers

An interventional study of Dyadic Problem Solving Training and Supportive Care in Stem Cell Transplant, Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplant and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-01.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adherence to the medical regimen after stem cell transplant is challenging for both patients and their family caregivers. The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial testing two brief psychosocial interventions to determine if either improves patient and family caregiver psychosocial and health-related outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial testing two brief, 4 session psychosocial interventions to help patients and family caregivers better manage the time period after hospital discharge from stem cell transplant. Patients and family caregivers will be randomized to either the skill learning intervention (n=52 patient-family caregiver dyads) or to the supportive care intervention (n=52 patient-family caregiver dyads). The intervention will be conducted via live video conferencing. Patients and family caregivers will complete questionnaires before the intervention and at 1-, 5-, 12-, 24 weeks afterwards. The investigators will determine whether the skills learning group has improved outcomes, including adherence to the medical regimen and perceived task efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stem Cell Transplant
  • Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplant
  • Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

Keywords

  • stem cell transplant
  • hematopoietic stem cell transplant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient undergoing a stem cell transplant at the University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center
  • 18 years or older
  • having a family caregiver age 18 years or older also willing to participate in the study
  • willing to accept randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of stem cell transplant
  • Non-English speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
208 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dyadic Problem Solving Training (DPST)

    DPST will teach problem solving skills to both the patient and family caregiver as they manage the medical regimen.

    Behavioral: Dyadic Problem Solving Training

  • Active comparator
    Supportive Care

    Supportive Care will provide support to both the patient and family caregiver as they manage the medical regimen.

    Behavioral: Supportive Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralDyadic Problem Solving Training

    DPST consists of teaching the patient and family caregiver problem-solving skills that they can apply to help them manage the medical regimen after stem cell transplant.

    Also known as: DPST

  • BehavioralSupportive Care

    Supportive Care consists of providing support to the patient and family caregiver as they manage the medical regimen after stem cell transplant

    Also known as: SC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Health Habits Assessment - modified for stem cell transplant

    Assess levels of adherence to the post-transplant multi-component medical regimen of 20 main tasks; each task marked as yes = 1/no=0 adherent. Tasks will be grouped and summed into categories including medication taking (3 items, range 0=low to 3 high), infection precautions (6 items; range 0=low to 6 high), catheter/port care (4 items, range 0=low to 4 = high), and lifestyle behaviors (7 items, range 0=low to 7=high). Higher scores indicate greater adherence.

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12- and 24-weeks post-intervention

  2. Perceived task efficacy

    Assesses perceptions of efficacy to complete tasks of the post-transplant multi-component medical regimen, 20 items rated on 1=low to 10=high scale, mean score will be used.

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12- and 24-weeks post intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immunosuppressant blood levels

    levels of immunosuppressant medication in patient's blood

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12- and 24-weeks post-intervention

  2. Patient health care utilization

    Counts of number of hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and unplanned medical visits

    Time frame: continuous over 24 weeks post-intervention

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire- 9

    Assesses symptoms of depression, 9 items rated on 4-point scale from 0=not at all to 3=nearly every day. Sum and categorical classification will be used (score 10-14=moderate; score 15 and higher =severe.

    Time frame: baseline and 1-,5-,12-, and 24-weeks post-intervention

  4. Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7

    Assesses symptoms of anxiety, 7 items rated from 0=not at all to 3=nearly every day. Sum and category will be used (score 10-14 = moderate; score 15 or higher = severe)

    Time frame: baseline and 1-, 5-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-intervention

  5. Dyadic Adjustment Scale - modified

    Assess relationship quality, 9 items rated from 1=not at all to 5 = often; range 9-45; sum will be used. Higher scores indicate greater relationship quality.

    Time frame: baseline and 1-, 5-, 12-, 24-weeks post-intervention

  6. Task Responsibility

    Rating of whether the patient was mostly responsible, the caregiver was mostly responsible, or the patient and caregiver had equal responsibility in making sure each task of the post-transplant multi-component medical regimen is completed. Levels of each of the three choices will be tabulated. The highest level will dictate the categorical score (patient mostly responsible; caregiver mostly responsible; patient and caregiver equally responsible).

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-intervention

  7. Caregiver Reaction Assessment

    Assesses burden in caregivers, 24 items rated on a 1=low to 5=high; range = 24-120; sum will be used.

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12-, 24- weeks

  8. Cancer and Treatment Distress Scale

    Assess distress specific to cancer, 35 items are rated from 0=none to 3=severe; range = 0-105; sum score will be used.

    Time frame: baseline and 1-, 5-, 12-, 24-weeks post-intervention

  9. PROMIS - 16 v2.1

    Assesses overall health-related quality of life and functioning, 16 items rated from 1=low to 5 = high; higher scores indicate greater health-related quality of life; sum will be used.

    Time frame: baseline and 1-, 5-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Client Satisfaction Assessment - 8

    Ratings of satisfaction with the intervention, 8 items, rating scale from 1 (low) to 4 (high). Sum of ratings on each item will be used with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 1-week post intervention

  2. Satisfaction with Telehealth Technology

    assess satisfaction with telehealth services, 2 items rated on 1=low to 7=high scale range = 2-14; sum will be used.

    Time frame: 1-week post intervention

  3. clinical outcomes

    presence of graft failure, graft versus host disease, and survival

    Time frame: continuous over 24-weeks post-intervention

  4. Lack of Attention from Health Care Professionals

    A four-item subscale of the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences of Needs scale. Items have five possible responses: always/most days = 4; mostly=3; only sometimes=2; rarely/never=1, and don't know/not relevant=0. Items are summed to make a total score; higher score indicates more attention from health care professionals.

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12- and 24-weeks post-intervention

  5. Worry about mistakes

    1 item specifying how worried are you about making a mistake or unintentionally hurting the patient while caring for him/her. Responses include 1=very worried; 2=somewhat worried; 3=only a little; 4=not at all. Lower responses indicate greater worry.

    Time frame: 1-, 5-, 12- and 24-weeks post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
    • Donna Posluszny, PhD · Contact · poslusznydm@upmc.edu · 412-623-5966
    • Donna Posluszny, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Posluszny DM, Bovbjerg DH, Syrjala KL, Agha M, Dew MA. Correlates of anxiety and depression symptoms among patients and their family caregivers prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for hematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Feb;27(2):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4346-3. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PubMed 30022348 ↗
  • Posluszny DM, Bovbjerg DH, Syrjala KL, Agha M, Farah R, Hou JZ, Raptis A, Im AP, Dorritie KA, Boyiadzis MM, Dew MA. Rates and Predictors of Nonadherence to the Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Medical Regimen in Patients and Caregivers. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Mar;28(3):165.e1-165.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.11.020. Epub 2021 Dec 4. PubMed 34875403 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study database will be reviewed to ensure that no identifying information of any type is contained therein. A downloadable, de-identified data set and data dictionary will be made available electronically from the PI after the request is reviewed by the research team for scientific merit and requestors provide evidence to the PI that (a) their plan for the use of such data has been approved by their institution's Institutional Review Board or its equivalent, and (b) they have completed NIH requirements for training in research integrity and human subjects protection.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07107165
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Donna Posluszny (Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 6, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 1, 2026

Study contacts

Donna Posluszny, PhD
Contact
poslusznydm@upmc.edu
412-623-5966

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion