CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07103954Updated Jun 30, 2026

Mckenzie Exercises Versus Mulligan Mobilization in Text Neck Syndrome

An interventional study of McKenzie Exercises plus Conventional Physical Therapy and Mulligan Mobilization with Conventional Physical Therapy in Neck Pain, Text Neck Posture and Text Neck Syndrome, sponsored by University of Lahore. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by University of Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2024, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neck pain is an important public health issue that affects the whole population. Consequently, there is a significant decrease in the quality of work and life and can have a negative socioeconomic impact on both individuals and society. For the treatment of pain in the spine and extremities, especially the neck, the McKenzie method of mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MMDT) is a popular choice. Mulligan mobilization approach was found to be beneficial for both pain and functioning in individuals with mechanical neck discomfort.

Read the detailed description

Text Neck Syndrome, commonly referred to as turtle neck posture, is the fourth leading cause of disability globally. Different exercises and techniques have been implemented to manage it. Individually, there have been several studies conducted on McKenzie exercises and Mulligan mobilization. This study will provide valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of McKenzie exercises and Mulligan mobilization for text neck syndrome. This study's findings will contribute to the development of evidence-based guidelines for managing TNS, enhancing clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Text Neck Posture
  • Text Neck Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MCKENZIE EXERCISES
  • MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION
  • TEXT NECK SYNDROME
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Lahore is the lead sponsor of 223 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20 to 45 years
  • Both genders will be included.
  • A minimum of three hours must be spent using smartphones every day.
  • More than one year of using any electronic gadgets.
  • Craniovertebral Angle \< 53

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any known illness that may cause pain in the upper limbs or neck. (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Any cervical spine injuries.
  • Any neurological or cardiovascular issue (e.g., epilepsy, hypertension)
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    McKenzie Exercise plus CPT

    In this group, McKenzie exercises with conventional physical therapy.

    Other: McKenzie Exercises plus Conventional Physical Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Mulligan Exercise plus CPT

    In this group, Mulligan mobilization with conventional physical therapy. The

    Other: Mulligan Mobilization with Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherMcKenzie Exercises plus Conventional Physical Therapy

    First of all conventional physical therapy is applied. For this we will use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and hot pack, positioned over the neck region, for 15-20 minutes. This will help in improving blood flow and increasing muscle activation. For McKenzie exercises, the participant will be in a comfortable sitting posture with proper back support. He will be asked to perform the following exercises: 1. Retraction in supine and sitting positions 2. Retraction with patient and therapist overpressure 3. Retraction with extension and rotation 4. Rotation with patient and therapist overpressure 5. Lateral flexion 6. Lateral flexion with patient and therapist overpressure • All these exercises will be done with a hold of one or two seconds and the movement is then repeated for five to six times.

  • OtherMulligan Mobilization with Conventional Physical Therapy

    First of all conventional physical therapy is applied. For this we will use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and hot pack, positioned over the neck region, for 15-20 minutes. This will help in improving blood flow and increasing muscle activation. The Mulligan mobilization, the patient will be seated in a comfortable position on a chair and the therapist stood behind to perform the mulligan mobilization. A gliding force will be applied by the therapist on the patient's spinous process or on the facet joint of the superior vertebra of the target segment for treatment. This gliding force will be maintained by the therapist. Then the patient will move his head towards the painful side (flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion), and more pressure will be applied by the patient at the end of active movement. The Mulligan mobilization will be repeated 10 times for 3 sets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    The pain intensity will be measured using a visual analogue scale. The VAS is a self-reported scale that consists of anchor points for "no pain" and "worst possible pain" on a horizontal line (10 cm long). The patient is asked to mark at a single point along a 10-cm line that most accurately represent his level of pain. This line represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale, with "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) and "worst pain" on the right (10 cm).

    Time frame: The pain intensity will be measured using a visual analogue scale at baseline, and change in pain intensity will be measured at 2nd week and 4th week.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional disability

    It will be measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), which was the first instrument created to evaluate neck pain patients' self-rated disabilities. It consists of ten questions in the following domains: Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Reading, Headaches, Concentration, Work, Driving, Sleeping, and Recreation. Each question contains six answer choices, scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). The scores for each section are then added. Scoring is reported on a 0-50 scale, 0 being the best possible score and 50 being the worst.

    Time frame: The functional disability will be measured at baseline, and change in function level will be measured at 2nd week and 4th week.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — In order to keep the privacy of participants and confidentiality.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07103954
Lead sponsor
University of Lahore
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025
Completion
Aug 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

Ashfaq Prof. Ahmad, PhD
study chair · University of Lahore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion