ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07089472Updated Jul 28, 2025

Dry Needling Versus Cyriax Technique on Pain, Paraesthesia and Functional Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Dry Needling Therapy and Cyriax Technique in Meralgia Paresthetica and Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), sponsored by University of Lahore. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-28.

Sponsored by University of Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of two physiotherapy techniques-Dry Needling and the Cyriax Technique-in people suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) that radiates to the outer thigh, a condition commonly known as meralgia paresthetica.

Meralgia paresthetica occurs when a nerve called the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) gets compressed, leading to pain, numbness, tingling, or burning sensations in the front or side of the thigh. Many patients also experience difficulty in performing daily activities because of these symptoms.

Dry Needling is a modern treatment where fine, sterile needles are inserted into specific muscles to relieve tension and improve nerve function. It is believed to release natural pain-relieving chemicals and reduce inflammation.

On the other hand, the Cyriax Technique is a manual therapy approach involving deep friction massage and gentle mobilizations targeted at the affected nerve area to reduce pressure and pain.

In this study, 80 participants between the ages of 30 and 50 years, who have had low back pain for more than three months and symptoms of nerve entrapment in the thigh, will be randomly divided into two groups. One group will receive Dry Needling therapy, and the other will receive Cyriax treatment. Both groups will also receive standard physiotherapy, including heat therapy, muscle stimulation, and stretching exercises. Treatment will continue for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week).

The aim is to evaluate and compare changes in pain, tingling/numbness (paraesthesia), and daily life functioning using recognized clinical tools such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Data will be collected at the beginning, and then again after 2, 4, and 8 weeks.

This research will help determine which therapy-Dry Needling or Cyriax-is more effective in treating patients with this type of nerve-related back and thigh pain. The findings may guide physiotherapists and healthcare providers in choosing the most suitable treatment for managing meralgia paresthetica in chronic low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiating symptoms to the anterolateral thigh, often due to meralgia paresthetica (MP), represents a complex clinical presentation with both musculoskeletal and neuropathic components. MP results from entrapment or irritation of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), leading to symptoms such as numbness, tingling, burning sensations, and pain in the outer thigh. These symptoms can significantly impair quality of life and physical functioning.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare two physiotherapeutic interventions-Dry Needling (DN) and the Cyriax Technique-with respect to their impact on pain relief, reduction of paraesthesia, and improvement in functional disability among patients with MP secondary to CLBP.

Participants will be screened based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible participants will be adults aged 30-50 years, diagnosed with CLBP lasting more than three months and exhibiting characteristic symptoms of MP. Exclusion criteria include prior spinal surgery, coagulopathies, serious neurological disorders, or contraindications to dry needling.

After obtaining informed consent, participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group (DN) or control group (Cyriax) using computer-generated randomization. Both groups will receive 16 treatment sessions over 8 weeks (2 sessions per week), in addition to standard physiotherapy consisting of heat therapy, electrical muscle stimulation, and targeted exercises.

The dry needling group will receive intramuscular stimulation along the anatomical route of the LFCN, targeting muscles including piriformis, psoas major, iliacus, tensor fasciae latae, vastus lateralis, and sartorius. Aseptic technique using solid filiform needles will be followed, with each needle retained in situ for 15 minutes per session.

The Cyriax group will receive deep transverse friction massage along the LFCN pathway, focused around the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), with repeated mobilizations aimed at releasing nerve entrapment and relieving local tissue tension.

Blinding will be maintained at the assessor level to reduce bias. Outcomes will be evaluated using standardized tools:

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity,

Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) for paraesthesia,

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for functional disability.

These assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2nd, 4th, and 8th weeks of the intervention period. The study is powered at 80% with a 95% confidence interval to detect statistically significant between-group differences. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS, with ANOVA applied for both intra- and inter-group comparisons.

This trial is expected to provide clinically meaningful insights into which physiotherapy technique yields better therapeutic outcomes in MP associated with chronic low back pain. It will also contribute to evidence-based practice by addressing a gap in the comparative literature for these two commonly used interventions in musculoskeletal and peripheral nerve-related pain management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meralgia Paresthetica
  • Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)

Keywords

  • Chronic low back pain
  • Cyriax technique
  • Dry needling
  • Functional disability
  • Meralgia paresthetica
  • Neuropathic pain
  • Paraesthesia
  • Physiotherapy
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 52 across 831 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Lahore is the lead sponsor of 232 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with chronic low back pain (time to onset ≥ 3 months) (Erbay, 2002).
  • Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 4 (Lara-Palomo et al., 2022).
  • CLBP radiating to Anterolateral thigh with symptoms of numbness tingling (de Ruiter et al., 2023).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sensory and/or coagulation disorders (Lara-Palomo et al., 2022).
  • A history of spinal surgery, heart complications, concurrent severe central or peripheral nervous system disease (de Ruiter et al., 2023).
  • Epilepsy, needle phobia, serious pathologies that can be the main cause of chronic low back pain other than meralgia parasthetica (Lara-Palomo et al., 2022).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dry Needling Group

    Participants in this group will receive dry needling therapy targeting muscles along the route of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), including the piriformis, iliacus, tensor fascia latae, vastus lateralis, and sartorius. Each session will involve needle insertion (90 sec-2 mins) with retention for 15 minutes. Sessions will be conducted twice a week for 8 weeks (total 16 sessions). Standard physiotherapy (hot pack, EMS, stretching) will be provided alongside.

    Behavioral: Dry Needling Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Cyriax Technique Group

    Participants in this group will receive the Cyriax technique (deep transverse friction massage and nerve mobilization) applied along the LFCN pathway near the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Each session will involve 3-5 repetitions of mobilization, with 10-15 second holds. Sessions will be conducted twice a week for 8 weeks (total 16 sessions). Standard physiotherapy (hot pack, EMS, stretching) will be provided alongside.

    Behavioral: Cyriax Technique

Interventions

  • BehavioralDry Needling Therapy

    Dry needling will be applied along the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) pathway, targeting muscles such as piriformis, iliacus, tensor fascia latae, vastus lateralis, and sartorius. Sterile solid filiform needles (0.25x30mm and 0.30x50mm) will be inserted for 90 seconds to 2 minutes using a cone technique and retained in situ for 15 minutes. Sessions will occur twice weekly for 8 weeks, with standard physiotherapy (hot pack, EMS, and guided stretches) administered alongside.

  • BehavioralCyriax Technique

    The Cyriax technique involves deep friction massage and mobilization of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) near the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Using the "pinch and roll" and deep pressure technique, therapists will apply sustained pressure along the nerve path in 3-5 repetitions per session, holding each for 10-15 seconds. Sessions will occur twice weekly for 8 weeks, alongside standard physiotherapy modalities and exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, a 10-cm line ranging from "no pain" to "worst possible pain." Participants will mark their pain level at each assessment point.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2nd week, 4th week, and 8th week

  2. Change in Paraesthesia Measured by Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    Paraesthesia symptoms including tingling, burning, and numbness will be assessed using the NPSI, a self-report tool evaluating intensity and frequency of neuropathic pain symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2nd week, 4th week, and 8th week

  3. Change in Functional Disability Measured by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)

    Functional disability will be assessed using the RMDQ, a 24-item self-report questionnaire measuring the impact of low back pain on daily activities. Higher scores indicate greater disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2nd week, 4th week, and 8th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital
    Lahore, 54590, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • de Ruiter GCW, Oosterhuis JWA, Vissers TFH, Kloet A. Unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica: systematic review of the literature and single center experience. Neurosurg Rev. 2023 May 6;46(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02023-2. PubMed 37148363 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07089472
Responsible party
Faisal Javaid (Student, University of Lahore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2025
Start date
Nov 25, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 11, 2025
Completion
Jul 19, 2025
Last update
Jul 28, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion