ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07086703IH-TTMUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C Versus Controlled Normothermia for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest

An interventional study of Induced hypothermia at 33°C and Control normothermia in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 31 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
788
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The IH-TTM trial is designed to determine whether survival with a favorable neurological outcome is improved by induced hypothermia at 33°C in comatose critically ill patients admitted after resuscitated in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Recent evidence suggests that targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33°C may provide no survival benefits compared to controlled normothermia in unselected patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this evidence is relevant only to OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, chiefly witnessed and immediately followed by resuscitation efforts. Only scant data are available for cardiac arrest (CA) of other origins and for IHCA.

In a randomized clinical trial of patients with CA in an initial non-shockable rhythm, the subgroup with IHCA had significantly better outcomes when treated with TTM at 33°C versus controlled normothermia; nevertheless, the sample size was limited. Another randomized controlled trial done specifically in patients with IHCA failed to show benefits of TTM at 33°C compared to controlled normothermia but was underpowered. Thus, whether therapeutic hypothermia is indicated after IHCA remains unclear. IH-TTM will be the largest trial assessing TTM after IHCA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Arrest

926 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 226 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 788 is above the median of 100 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IHCA (unwitnessed IHCA with initial asystole; these patients may still be eligible if visible or audible signs of life were witnessed within 10 minutes after IHCA (no-flow duration ≤10 minutes, in keeping with the non-inclusion criteria for HYPERION study).
  • Sustained ROSC (Return Of Spontaneous Circulation) defined as signs of circulation for 20 minutes without chest compressions
  • At least 1 mg of epinephrine
  • Coma defined as an inability to obey verbal commands (Glasgow Coma Scale motor response \<6 or Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score motor response \<4) after sustained ROSC
  • Eligible for intensive care without restrictions or limitations
  • Inclusion within 90 minutes of ROSC
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Next of kin informed about the trial and having consented to participation of the patient in the trial (patients with coma are unable to consent). If no next of kin can be contacted during screening for the study, trial inclusion will be completed as an emergency procedure by the ICU physician, in compliance with Country of inclusion law.
  • Healthcare costs covered by a healthcare insurance system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Temperature at admission \<30°C
  • Obvious or suspected pregnancy
  • Intracranial bleeding
  • Dependent on others for activities of daily living before hospitalization
  • Patient under curators, guardianship or under protection of justice
  • Correctional facility inmate
  • Patient who does no speak French
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
788 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Induced hypothermia at 33°C

    Other: Induced hypothermia at 33°C

  • Active comparator
    Control normothermia

    Other: Control normothermia

Interventions

  • OtherInduced hypothermia at 33°C

    Cooling and maintenance phase : The aim is to achieve the target temperature of 33±0.5°C within 60 minutes after randomization. The target temperature of 33±0.5°C and device setting of 33°C will be maintained until 28 hours after randomization. \- Rewarming: Normothermia will be restored by gradual rewarming at a rate of 0.2°C/h. \- After rewarming: After 40 hours, in those participants who are still comatose or sedated, normothermia (36.5-37.7°C) will be maintained until 72 hours after randomization, and active warming will be avoided.

  • OtherControl normothermia

    Participants whose initial temperature is below 33°C may be actively rewarmed to 36.5°-37.7°C, at which point active rewarming will be stopped and passive rewarming performed according to the latest guidelines. Participants whose initial temperature is above 33°C will not be actively rewarmed to normothermia. The goal will be to maintain temperature no higher than 37.8°C. After 40 hours, in those participants who are still comatose or sedated, normothermia (36.5-37.7°C) will be maintained until 72 hours after randomization, and active warming will be avoided.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess whether induced hypothermia (TTM at 33°C) is superior to targeted normothermia in providing a favorable neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3 at 6 months.

    The primary endpoint is a favorable neurological outcome at 6 months, defined as an mRS score between 0 and 3.

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality 2 months after randomization

    Causes of death (refractory hemodynamic shock, life-support withdrawal for neurological reasons, life-support withdrawal due to comorbidities, respiratory failure, sudden cardiac death, brain death)

    Time frame: 2 months after randomization

  2. All-cause mortality 3 months after randomization

    Causes of death (refractory hemodynamic shock, life-support withdrawal for neurological reasons, life-support withdrawal due to comorbidities, respiratory failure, sudden cardiac death, brain death)

    Time frame: 3 months after randomization

  3. All-cause mortality 4 months after randomization

    Causes of death (refractory hemodynamic shock, life-support withdrawal for neurological reasons, life-support withdrawal due to comorbidities, respiratory failure, sudden cardiac death, brain death)

    Time frame: 4 months after randomization

  4. All-cause mortality 6 months after randomization

    Causes of death (refractory hemodynamic shock, life-support withdrawal for neurological reasons, life-support withdrawal due to comorbidities, respiratory failure, sudden cardiac death, brain death)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

  5. ICU lengths of stay

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, an average of 20 days.

  6. Hospital lengths stay

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from hospital, an average of 20 days.

  7. Neurological outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, ranging from 0 to 6 at 2 months after randomization

    Time frame: 2 months after randomization

  8. Neurological outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, ranging from 0 to 6 at 3 months after randomization

    A score of 0 to 3 is considered a favorable neurological outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months after randomization

  9. Neurological outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ranging from 0 to 6 at 4 months after randomization

    A score of 0 to 3 is considered a favorable neurological outcome.

    Time frame: 4 months after randomization

  10. Mechanical ventilation duration

    A score of 0 to 3 is considered a favorable neurological outcome.

    Time frame: from time of randomization to final extubation or up to 28 days

  11. Biomarkers concentration : neuron-specific enolase (NSE) on day 0

    Time frame: at day 0

  12. Biomarkers concentration : neuron-specific enolase (NSE) on day 2

    Time frame: at day 2

  13. Biomarkers concentration : neuron-specific enolase (NSE) on day 3

    Time frame: at day 3

  14. Biomarkers concentration : neurofilament light chain (NFL) on day 2

    Time frame: at day 2

  15. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) 6 months after randomization

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

  16. Cognitive dysfunction assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 6 months after randomization

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

  17. Complications during ICU stay : nosocomial infections

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, or up to 28 days.

  18. Complications during ICU stay : severe arrhythmias

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, or up to 28 days.

  19. Complications during ICU stay : venous thromboembolism

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, or up to 28 days.

  20. Complications during ICU stay : ischemic complications

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, or up to 28 days.

  21. Complications during ICU stay : sedations complications

    Time frame: from day of randomization until the day of discharge from ICU, or up to 28 days.

07

Study locations

31 of 31 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Universitaire de Gand
    Ghent, Belgium, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Patrick DRUWE, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles
    Jette, Belgium, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Tim BALTHAZAR, PH · Contact
  • Clinique Saint-PIerre
    Ottignies, Belgium, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Nicolas SERCK, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Fabio Silvio TACCONE, PU-PH · Contact
  • CHU Charleroi
    Charleroi, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Michael PIAGNERELLI, PU-PH · Contact
  • CH d'Angoulême
    Angoulême, France 16000, France
    Recruiting
    • Laurent LAINE, PH · Contact
  • CH Dubois Brive
    Brive-la-Gaillarde, France 19312 cedex, France
    Recruiting
    • Nicolas PICHON, PH · Contact
  • CHU de Caen
    Caen, France 14033, France
    Recruiting
    • Cédric DAUBIN, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Simone Veil
    Cannes, France 06414 cedex, France
    Recruiting
    • Pierre-Marie BERTRAND, PH · Contact
  • CH Public du Cotentin
    Cherbourg, France 50102, France
    Recruiting
    • Julien CALUS, PH · Contact
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, France 63003 cedex 1, France
    Recruiting
    • Cécile Gosset, PH · Contact
  • CHU Bocage
    Dijon, France 77908, France
    Recruiting
    • Jean-Pierre QUENOT, PU-PH · Contact
  • CHD Vendée
    La Roche-sur-Yon, France 85025 Cedex, France
    Recruiting
    • Gwenael COLIN, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital André Mignot
    Le Chesnay, France 78150, France
    Recruiting
    • Marine PAUL, PH · Contact
  • CHRU- Hôpital Roger Salengro
    Lille, France 59307 cedex, France
    Recruiting
    • Patrick GIRARDIE, PU-PH · Contact
  • CHU Dupuytren
    Limoges, France 87042 Cedex 1, France
    Recruiting
    • Bruno EVRARD, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Lyon, France 69437, France
    Recruiting
    • Laurent ARGAUD, PU-PH · Contact
  • APHM - Hôpital Nord
    Marseille, France 13015, France
    Recruiting
    • Sami HRAIECH, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier
    Massy, France 91300, France
    Recruiting
    • Wulfran BOUGOUIN, PH · Contact
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, France, France
    Recruiting
    • Jean-Baptiste LASCARROU, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital de l'Archet
    Nice, France 06200, France
    Recruiting
    • Mattieu JOZWIAK, PH · Contact
  • CHR d'Orléans
    Orléans, France 45100, France
    Recruiting
    • Grégoire MULLER, PH · Contact
  • APHP-Hôpital Saint-Antoine
    Paris, France 75517, France
    Recruiting
    • Eric MAURY, PU-PH · Contact
  • APHP- Hôpital Cochin
    Paris, France 75679 cedex 14, France
    Recruiting
    • Alain CARIOU, PU-PH · Contact
  • APHP - Hôpital Ambroise Paré
    Paris, France 92200, France
    Recruiting
    • Guillaume GERI, PU-PH · Contact
  • CH de Roanne
    Roanne, France, France
    Recruiting
    • Jean-Charles CHAKARIAN, PH · Contact
  • CHRU de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France 67091 cedex, France
    Recruiting
    • Hamid MERDJI, PH · Contact
  • Hôpital Sainte-Musse
    Toulon, France 83100, France
    Recruiting
    • Jonathan CHELLY, PH · Contact
  • CHRU de Tours
    Tours, France 37044 Cedex 9, France
    Recruiting
    • Pierre-François DEQUIN, PH · Contact
  • CH Brocéliande Atlantique
    Vannes, France 56017 cedex 1, France
    Recruiting
    • Agathe DELBOVE, PH · Contact
  • CHU Les Abymes
    Pointe-à-Pitre, La Guadeloupe 97110, Guadeloupe
    Recruiting
    • Frédéric MARTINO, PU-PH · Contact
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07086703
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 25, 2025
Start date
Aug 13, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 13, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 13, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Jean-Baptiste LASCARROU, PH
Contact
jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr
+33(0)240087386

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion