CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07084077Updated Aug 7, 2025

Investigating the Effects of a Short Narratology Education Module on Empathy and Patient-centred Communication in Early-stage Medical Students.

An observational study in Empathy, Patient-centredness and Narrative Medicine, sponsored by Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-07.

Sponsored by Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Effective communication is a fundamental skill in clinical medicine; however, traditional approaches often fail to equip learners with an ability to authentically and empathically engage with the complexities of real patients' experiences. Narratology education has been proposed as a pedagogical framework for augmenting empathy and patient-centred communication in medical students.

In April 2025, we undertook a mixed-methods pilot study to evaluate the impact of a one-week narratology education module on second-year undergraduate medical students at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin. The module involved close reading, group viewings, facilitated small-group workshops, and whole-group discussions in response to narrative works by Irish writers and storytellers, followed by written personal reflections. At the outset and conclusion of the module, each student undertook a clinical history with a simulated patient (SP) portraying early-stage dementia. SPs assessed each student's empathy and communication using the CARE Measure.

Read the detailed description

Effective communication is a fundamental skill in clinical medicine; however, traditional approaches often fail to equip learners with an ability to authentically and empathically engage with the complexities of real patients' experiences. Narratology education has been proposed as a pedagogical framework for augmenting empathy and patient-centred communication in medical students.

In April 2025, we undertook a mixed-methods pilot study to evaluate the impact of a one-week narratology education module on second-year undergraduate medical students at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin. The module involved close reading, group viewings, facilitated small-group workshops, and whole-group discussions in response to narrative works by Irish writers and storytellers, followed by written personal reflections. At the outset and conclusion of the module, each student undertook a clinical history with a simulated patient (SP) portraying early-stage dementia. SPs assessed each student's empathy and communication using the CARE Measure.

Included students undertook two encounters with a simulated patient (SP): one immediately before and one immediately after the one-week narratology education module. In each encounter, students carried out a 7-minute history-taking exercise with an SP portraying cognitive decline/early-stage dementia. Immediately following each encounter, each SP completed the CARE Measure (11) - a validated tool to assess empathy and communication skills in healthcare workers. In the CARE Measure, ten items are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), with the total score being the sum of those ten items; in the event of missing or not applicable (N/A) ratings, the mean rating of available items was calculated and then multiplied by ten to estimate the total score. The CARE Measure items cover key aspects of empathy and clinical communication, including "Really listening," "Letting you tell your story," "Showing care and compassion," and "Being interested in you as a whole person." Ten SPs, with experience in medical education, were employed to perform a scripted-narrative of cognitive decline/early-stage dementia that had been iteratively developed by the investigating team and agreed by consensus prior to the start of the module. Each SP received the approved scripted-narrative one-week prior to the start of the module; in addition, they undertook a one-hour group pre-briefing session immediately prior to each simulation to ensure consistency of performance. Both pre-briefing sessions were facilitated by the investigating team including the narratology-expert.

At the end of the module, students submitted a reflective essay, i.e., 500-words using the Gibbs cycle as a framework, articulating how they had interrogated the narrative works of Irish writers and storytellers during the week and how narratology education had affected their appreciation for point-of-view and perspective in personal stories, their evolving narrative competence, and their empathy, communication, and performance in healthcare encounters.

Statistical analyses were undertaken using Stata/SE 17.0 (StataCorp [2021] Stata: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.), GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts USA), and NVivo 15 (Lumivero [2023] NVivo (Version 15). Lumivero.).

Central tendencies for ordinal data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Pre- and post-intervention CARE Measure total scores and their individual item ratings were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, with a two-tailed P \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Reflection essays were uploaded to NVivo 15 for thematic analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Empathy
  • Patient-centredness
  • Narrative Medicine

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • Patient-centred communication
  • narrative medicine
  • medical education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Second-year medical students at RCSI Dublin

Inclusion criteria

Second-year medical students at RCSI Dublin Over 18 years of age Electing to take the student-choice module in Narrative Medicine

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

English not as a first language

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherNarratology education module

    At RCSI Dublin, mentioned by James Joyce in Dubliners, a one-week student-choice module Narrative Medicine: lessons from Irish writers and storytellers was offered to those in the second of our five-year undergraduate medical degree program, i.e., students were 18-months into the curriculum, had limited communication skills training, and no real-world clinical exposure. The module used close reading, group viewing, small-group workshops, and whole-group discussions to foster narrative competence. A medically-trained narratology-expert facilitated students' interrogation of classic and award-winning non-healthcare themed works by Irish writers and storytellers, i.e., directors and/or producers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in total Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure score as assessed by Simulated Patients

    In the CARE Measure, ten items are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), with the total score being the sum of those ten items (maximum score 50, minimum score zero); in the event of missing or not applicable (N/A) ratings, the mean rating of available items was calculated and then multiplied by ten to estimate the total score.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Change in individual Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure score items' scores as assessed by Simulated Patients

    In the CARE Measure, ten items are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), with the total score being the sum of those ten items (maximum score 50, minimum score zero); in the event of missing or not applicable (N/A) ratings, the mean rating of available items was calculated and then multiplied by ten to estimate the total score.

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • RCSI School of Medicine
    Dublin, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alhaidari B, Mulhall C, Condron C, Shpigelman J, Jain D, Daly MJ. Investigating the effects of a short narratology module on empathy and patient-centred communication in early-stage medical students: an empirical mixed-methods pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 2;26(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-08264-7. PubMed 41331818 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07084077
Lead sponsor
Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown
Responsible party
Michael J Daly, MA MD PhD (Consultant Cardiologist, Senior Lecturer, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Jul 10, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion