ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07082413Updated Jul 24, 2025

Biofrequency-Guided Nutrition in Spanish Adults

An interventional study of Nutritional Intervention in Biofrequency-Guided Nutrition, sponsored by Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a biofrequency-guided nutritional intervention in promoting a healthy diet, improving dietary behaviors, and enhancing user satisfaction among healthy Spanish adults. The present study aims to address four main objectives: (1) to analyze the utility of the biofrequency system for non-invasive functional estimates of nutritional status; (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of the associated algorithm in generating bi-omarker-informed dietary recommendations; (3) to assess user and healthcare profes-sional acceptance and satisfaction with the tool; and (4) to examine the effects of the intervention on eating habits.

Read the detailed description

Background: Biomarker-based nutrition has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to population-level approaches in improving health outcomes. Biofrequency analysis, a non-invasive technique based on the detection of electromagnetic vibrational patterns in hair follicles, offers a promising avenue for rapid functional assessment of nutritional status and epigenetic signals without reliance on blood or urine sampling. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a biofrequency-guided nutritional intervention in promoting a healthy diet, improving dietary behaviors, and enhancing user satisfaction among healthy Spanish adults. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 154 adults from the Grupo Alcaraz Sport Association (Region of Murcia, Spain) will be allocated to an experimental group receiving individualized lifestyle recommendations based on S-Drive biofrequency analysis and to a control group with no intervention. Participants in the experimental arm will apply tailored dietary guidance over 90 days. Conclusion: This study will generate foundational evidence on the utility of biofrequency technology for precision nutrition. If positive, the findings may inform scalable, low-risk strategies for personalized dietary interventions in preventive and community health settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biofrequency-Guided Nutrition

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biofrequency analysis
  • biomarker-based nutrition
  • dietary habits
  • mediterranean diet
  • nutritional biomarkers
  • nutritional intervention
  • young athletes
03

In context

Feeding Behavior

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding Behavior; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 154 is above the median of 77 across 700 interventional studies indexed under Feeding Behavior.

Browse Feeding Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • No diagnosed chronic illnesses.
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed chronic illnesses
  • No provision of written .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
154 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard diet

    The experimental group will undergo a standardized and comprehensive nutritional intervention designed to optimize health outcomes and improve the biomarkers under study. This intervention will incorporate both practical dietary guidelines and an educational component aimed at enhancing participants' understanding of underlying health principles. Participants will receive detailed documentation, including: (1) dietary guidelines outlining the nutritional protocol, (2) a sample monthly meal plan, (3), a structured shopping list, (4) selected recipes and (5) visual meal preparation guides. To facilitate self-monitoring, a food intake log will be provided for daily dietary tracking. The intervention will include an educational program covering key health concepts relevant to the study. Through informational materials and group sessions, participants will receive instruction on topics such as stress physiology, epigenetic mechanisms, chronic disease prevention, and mindful eating pr

    Other: Nutritional Intervention

  • No intervention
    Usual diet

    The control group will maintain their habitual dietary patterns without receiving intervention materials or support. This approach will ensure that all experimental group participants receive identical guidelines, benefiting from multiple modalities of education and support, thereby establishing a robust framework for dietary modification.

Interventions

  • OtherNutritional Intervention

    This study will follow a randomized controlled trial design aimed at evaluating the impact of nutritional intervention on personal satisfaction and perceived quality of life. The protocol includes two assessment points: a baseline measurement at the start of the intervention (Day 0) and a second measurement after a follow-up period (Day 90), allowing for the analysis of with-in-subject changes associated with the intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Epigenetic Optimization

    Functional status will be assessed with the S-Drive optimization report, which analyzes resonance frequency patterns from hair follicle samples using proprietary algorithms. The report classifies each participant's physiological functioning into 12 domains grouped into four categories: (1) Micronutrient indicators (vitamins, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, antioxidants); (2) Systemic physiological indicators (immune system, gut health, circulatory function); (3) Epigenetic and environmental stressors (EMF, ELF radiation, toxins, additives); and (4) Dietary guidance (food choices, hydration, supplementation). Each domain is rated on four qualitative levels: "not flagged" (0), "to be considered" (1), "advisable" (2), and "priority" (3). Two derived scores will be analyzed: the total number of "priority" domains and a cumulative optimization score (0-36). These will be used to assess within-subject changes and between-group differences from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anthropometric Data

    Anthropometric data, including current body weight (in kilograms) and height (in centimeters), will be self-reported by participants. These measurements will be used to compute body mass index (BMI), which is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters (kg/m²). BMI categories will be defined in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) standards: BMI \< 18.5 ("underweight"), 18.5 ≤ BMI \< 24.9 ("normal weight"), 25 ≤ BMI \< 29.9 ("overweight"), 30 ≤ BMI \< 34.9 ("obesity class I"), 35 ≤ BMI \< 39.9 ("obesity class II"), and BMI ≥ 40 ("obesity class III") (Weir \& Jan, 2023). Although self-reported measurements may be susceptible to bias, previous research indicates that self-reported BMI estimates are generally valid in adult populations (Stommel \& Schoenborn, 2009).

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  2. 24-Hour Movement Behaviors

    Physical activity across work/school, transport, and leisure will be assessed with the validated PAS-2.1S (Valles-Medina et al., 2021). The scale has nine items: six on daily activities (weekday/weekend sleep, sedentary behavior, active physical activity, leisure, commuting) and three on weekly activities. Sleep duration is self-reported; sedentary behavior covers commuting by car/public transport and screen/reading time. The weekly subscale records light (e.g., walking), moderate (e.g., gardening), and vigorous (e.g., running) activities. Activity intensity, based on METs (Ainsworth et al., 2000), includes values such as sleep (0.9), sitting work (1.5), light activity (3.0), and vigorous activity (6.0). Daily work/transport METs are multiplied by five; sleep/leisure by seven. Missing daily hours (\<24) are doubled. Total METs from daily and weekly activities yield total energy expenditure.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  3. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet)

    Adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) will be measured using the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea (PREDIMED) questionnaire (Martínez-González et al., 2012). Participants will report the frequency or quantity of consumption of 12 core dietary components (e.g., fruits, vegetables, olive oil, nuts) and two related dietary habits. The 14-item tool assigns binary scores (0 or 1) to each component, with total scores ≥9 indicative of high adherence to the MedDiet.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  4. Tobacco smoking

    Tobacco use will be assessed with two questions. First, participants will be asked: "Have you ever smoked tobacco in your lifetime?", with response options ranging from (a) never to (g) 30 times or more. Second, adolescents will be asked about current smoking frequency: (a) I do not smoke, (b) less than once a week, (c) more than once a week but not daily, and (d) every day.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  5. Alcohol consumption

    Alcohol consumption will be assessed with: "Have you ever consumed alcohol in your lifetime?", offering options: never, once or twice, 3-5, 6-9, 10-19, 20-29, and 30+ times. Additionally, participants will report the frequency of different alcoholic beverages, coded into days per week: never (0), almost never (0.10), monthly (0.25), weekly (1), daily (7). The mean weekly frequency will then be calculated. Based on these data, participants will be classified as non-drinkers (never consumed alcohol), regular drinkers (weekly or more), or irregular drinkers (monthly or less). Binge drinking will be measured by asking: "Have you ever consumed enough alcohol to become intoxicated?", with options: never, once, 2-3, 4-10, and more than 10 times. Excessive consumption will be defined as having become intoxicated on at least one occasion.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  6. Cannabis use

    Cannabis consumption will be assessed with the question: "Have you ever used cannabis in your lifetime?", using response options: (a) never, (b) once or twice, (c) 3 to 5 times, (d) 6 to 9 times, (e) 10 to 19 times, (f) 20 to 29 times, and (g) 30 times or more.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  7. Depressive Symptoms

    Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) (Sanz \& Navarro, 2003). This self-administered instrument consists of 21 items, each with four response options representing increasing severity over the preceding two weeks. Item scores range from 0 to 3, yielding a total score between 0 and 63.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  8. Anxiety Symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms will be evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire, validated for primary care (Löwe et al., 2008). This instrument contains seven items (Spitzer et al., 2006), assessing symptoms such as nervousness, worry, restlessness, and irritability over the previous 14 days. Items are rated on a four-point Likert scale: never (0 points), several days (1 point), half of the days (2 points), and almost every day (3 points). Total scores range from 0 to 21, with thresholds as follows: no anxiety (0-4 points), mild anxiety symptoms (5-9 points), moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14 points), and severe anxiety symptoms (15-21 points).

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  9. Perceived stress

    Perceived stress will be assessed using the Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14) (Remor, 2006; Remor \& Carrobles, 2001). This 14-item instrument utilizes a five-point response scale: never (0 points), almost never (1 point), once in a while (2 points), often (3 points), and very often (4 points). The total score is calculated by reversing the responses for items 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 using the conversion scale (0=4, 1=3, 2=2, 3=1, 4=0) and then summing the scores of all 14 items. Higher scores reflect greater perceived stress.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

  10. Disordered eating

    Disordered eating behaviors will be evaluated using the Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire, a concise and validated screening instrument designed to identify individuals at risk for eating disorders (Garcia-Campayo et al., 2005). The SCOFF consists of five items that capture core dimensions of disordered eating, including restrictive intake, preoccupation with weight and shape, and compensatory behaviors. Each item requires a binary (yes/no) response, and a score of ≥2 affirmative answers indicate an increased risk for an eating disorder.

    Time frame: On day 0 and day 90

Other outcomes

  1. Sociodemographic Data

    Participants will provide self-reported information regarding their sex and age. Data will also be gathered on their current engagement in educational pursuits, employment status, participation in remunerated activities, and their specific occupation. Additionally, participants will be asked to indicate the primary reason for their most recent visit to primary care services. Educational attainment will be categorized as follows: (a) incomplete primary education (\<6 years), (b) completed primary education (6 years), (c) incomplete secondary education (\<4 years), (d) completed secondary education (4 years), (e) incomplete higher education (\<2 years of baccalaureate studies), and (f) completed higher education (2 years of baccalaureate studies or a bachelor's degree).

    Time frame: On day 0

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD (Individual Participant Data) will not be shared because the study involves sensitive human data protected under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Additionally, the biological data are generated through a proprietary device and algorithm (S-Drive, Cell Wellbeing) that are subject to confidentiality agreements, which prevent the release of raw data. As this is an exploratory randomized controlled trial, there is also no current plan for public data sharing.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07082413
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo
Collaborators
Universidad de Almeria, Universidad de Granada, Universidad de Los Lagos, Universidad Loyola Andalucia
Responsible party
José Francisco López Gil (Investigador principal, Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 7, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion