CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07073235NIMBLEUpdated Nov 25, 2025

Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) on Motor Recovery of Lower Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Stroke, Hemiparesis After Stroke and Chronic Stroke Patients, sponsored by Danderyd Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-25.

Sponsored by Danderyd Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects and clinical feasibility of non-invasive brain stimulation protocols, specifically intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, as part of rehabilitation interventions for motor recovery of lower extremity in the chronic phase after stroke.

It also seeks to explore the underlying mechanisms by investigating changes of functional and structural brain networks.

Read the detailed description

In this randomized control trial (RCT) group A will receive iTBS while group B will receive sham iTBS. Both groups will directly after the intervention receive 45 minutes of conventional physical therapy 3 times per week for 5 weeks, a total of 15 interventions by a blinded physiotherapist. For the iTBS intervention a Magstim Rapid² stimulator will be used also equipped with a Cadwell Sierra Summit EMG system [for motor evoked potential (MEP) measurements] and an ANT Visor2™ neuronavigation system [for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions]. The iTBS parameters that will be used are: 600 pulses under 190 seconds at 80 % of Active Motor Threshold (AMT). The contralesional cerebellum will be targeted. The participants and clinical assessors will be blinded to the intervention.

All the patients will undergo advanced neuroimaging examinations before and after the intervention period. The exams will be then compared to identify neuroplastic changes in brain circuits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis After Stroke
  • Chronic Stroke Patients
  • Hemiplegia
  • Ambulatory Difficulty

Keywords

  • stroke
  • iTBS
  • TMS
  • Trancranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Cerebellum
  • Chronic stroke patients
  • Balance
  • Walking
  • Hemiparesis
  • intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
03

In context

Stroke

7,283 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,013 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 56 is above the median of 50 across 5,366 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Danderyd Hospital is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18
  • Chronic stroke (>6 months)
  • Residual hemiparesis FAC ≥3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metal implants
  • Epilepsy/seizures
  • Pregnancy
  • Claustrophobia (related to MRIs exams)
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Untreated or unstable depression/anxiety
  • Other disabilities prohibiting intensive physical training
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Contralesional cerebellum iTBS and conventional rehabilitation

    The experimental group will receive intermittent theta burst stimulation on the contralesional cerebellum followed by 45 minutes of conventional rehabilitation interventions involving the lower extremity led or instructed by a physiotherapist.

    Device: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Contralesional cerebellum sham-iTBS and conventional rehabilitation

    The placebo group will get sham intermittent theta burst stimulation on the contralesional cerebellum followed by 45 minutes of conventional rehabilitation interventions involving the lower extremity led or instructed by a physiotherapist.

    Device: Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceIntermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    iTBS protocol: 600 pulses at 80% of AMT for 190 sec on the contralesional cerebellum, targeted with the support of a neuronavigational system, 15 sessions over a period of 5 weeks

    Also known as: iTBS, TMS

  • DeviceSham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    It is identical to its active version, replicates operational sounds, and delivers a very shallow magnetic field to mimic the sensation of magnetic stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. miniBest test

    measures dynamic balance, functional mobility, and gait. It is a 14-item test scored on a 3-level ordinal scale. The score ranges from 0 to 28 points. A higher score indicates better balance.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity

    used to quantify sensorimotor function recovery after a stroke. It is a 43 item test scored on a 3-level ordinal scale. The score ranges from 0 to 86 points. A higher score indicates higher sensorimotor recovery.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    Assesses spasticity on a 6 point scale/muscle (0p no impairment, 5p max impairment/muscle).

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  3. Neuroflexor

    Medical technology device. Assesses spasticity by identifying the neural, viscous and elastic components during passive movement using a biomechanical algorithm (presented in Newton)

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  4. Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test (LEMOCOT)

    assesses motor coordination deficits after stroke. The LEMOCOT assesses how many times a participant can alternately touch a proximal and distal target with their big toe within 20 seconds. Higher scores indicate better motor coordination in the lower extremity.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  5. 6 minutes walk test

    assess submaximal aerobic/functional walking capacity, community walking prediction. Assesses walking endurance in meters walked. Longer distances indicate better walking capacity.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  6. Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)

    evaluates ambulation ability. It ranges from 0 to 5. Higher score indicates more independent ambulation.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  7. Falls Efficacy Scale Swedish version (FES-S)

    measure the level of concern about falling during social and physical activities inside and outside home. The total score ranges from 0 to 130. A higher total score on the FES-S indicates greater confidence in performing the activities without falling.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  8. Walking impact scale (MSWS-12 S)

    Assesses self-perceived limitations in walking. The score ranges from 12 to 60 (12p no impairments, 60p max impairment).

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  9. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    Captures the participant´s perception of performance in everyday living, over time and is used to set and evaluate goals of an intervention

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  10. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Assesses mental function (0p max impairment summed up to 30p no detected impairment)

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  11. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    is a self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke. It has 8 domains: strength, hand function, mobility, physical and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL and IADL), memory and thinking, communication, emotion, and social participation. It uses a 5-point Likert scale to assess the difficulty of performing various tasks within each domain. Higher scores indicate better outcome

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  12. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)

    electrical signals recorded from neural tissue or muscle following activation of central motor pathways. MEPs assess the integrity of descending motor pathways.

    Time frame: At baseline, after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess change as well at 12 weeks follow up.

  13. Resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI)

    a method aimed at examining intrinsic networks in the brain while no task is performed (rest); this is to estimate correlations between brain regions.

    Time frame: At baseline and after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess changes.

  14. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

    a method aimed at mapping structural correlations between brain regions.

    Time frame: At baseline and after completion of the 5 week intervention to assess changes

Other outcomes

  1. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    quantifies stroke severity based on weighted evaluation findings. The total NIHSS score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe strokes, categorized as follows: minor stroke (1-4), moderate stroke (5-15), moderate to severe stroke (16-20), and severe stroke (21-42).

    Time frame: At baseline.

  2. Barthel Index (BI)

    measures a person's ability to complete activities of daily living (ADL). Scores range from 0 to 100, categorized as follows: Total dependence (0-20), Severe dependence (21-60), Moderate dependence (61-90), Slight dependence (91-99), and Independence (100).

    Time frame: At baseline.

  3. Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire

    to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions, based on the developed Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). It uses a 5-point Likert scale to assess acceptability of the intervention. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability.

    Time frame: After completion of the 5 week intervention to assess acceptability.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Stockholm 18288
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramnani N. The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):511-22. doi: 10.1038/nrn1953. PubMed 16791141 ↗
  • Wang J, Wu Z, Hong S, Ye H, Zhang Y, Lin Q, Chen Z, Zheng L, Qin J. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving balance capacity and activity of daily living in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 15;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03720-1. PubMed 38879485 ↗
  • Wang C, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Zhao D, Xu Y, Liu Z, Wu C, Wu S, Yong M, Wu L. Comparative efficacy of different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols for lower extremity motor function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 15;18:1352212. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1352212. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38426021 ↗
  • Koch G, Bonni S, Casula EP, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Pellicciari MC, Cinnera AM, Ponzo V, Maiella M, Picazio S, Sallustio F, Caltagirone C. Effect of Cerebellar Stimulation on Gait and Balance Recovery in Patients With Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):170-178. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3639. PubMed 30476999 ↗
  • Jiang T, Wei X, Wang M, Xu J, Xia N, Lu M. Theta burst stimulation: what role does it play in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review of the existing evidence. BMC Neurol. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03492-0. PubMed 38297193 ↗
  • Fan H, Song Y, Cen X, Yu P, Biro I, Gu Y. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Lower-Limb Motor Ability in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;15:620573. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.620573. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34539362 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 25034472 ↗
  • Christiansen MG, Senko AW, Anikeeva P. Magnetic Strategies for Nervous System Control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2019 Jul 8;42:271-293. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050241. Epub 2019 Apr 2. PubMed 30939100 ↗
  • Qi S, Tian M, Rao Y, Sun C, Li X, Qiao J, Huang ZG. Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation to rehabilitation of poststroke lower extremity function and an improvement: Individual-target TMS. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Mar;14(2):e1636. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1636. Epub 2022 Nov 27. PubMed 36437474 ↗
  • Fan J, Fu H, Xie X, Zhong D, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Zhang J, Huang J, Li J, Jin R, Zheng Z. The effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neural Circuits. 2022 Nov 8;16:973561. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.973561. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36426136 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07073235
Lead sponsor
Danderyd Hospital
Collaborators
Karolinska Institutet
Responsible party
Susanne Palmcrantz (PhD, Associate Professor, Reg Physiotherapist, Danderyd Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
Start date
Nov 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 25, 2025

Study contacts

Susanne Palmcrantz, PhD, Associate Professor
Contact
susanne.palmcrantz@ki.se
004681235000
Susanne Palmcrantz, PhD, Associate Professor
principal investigator · Dep of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion